v1.4.0-rc.2 #415
Replies: 7 comments 9 replies
-
|
I have deleted all my rules and uninstalled the previous version (RC1) and then installed this version. And it's not starting by default ! LE: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
That's really weird. You don't need to uninstall previous version unless we post a note to do so, packages are expected to be upgradable. But anyway, first verify that the daemon is not running:
If it doesn't output the pid, launch the daemon as root:
and see if it exits with error or runs as expected. If it exits with an error post it here. Verify anyway that the files |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
It says: Then I killed it and ran the daemon as root: The "/etc/opensnitchd/rules/" exists and it's empty ! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Tried to run the same command again thinking that I stopped it before looking at the GUI if it has started this time or not and since I stopped it with CTRL + C is should've been stopped, but the output might say otherwise, I'm not sure: /usr/bin/opensnitchd -rules-path /etc/opensnitchd/rules/ -debug |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Do |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
No. In the "/etc/opensnitchd/" only "rules" directory exits, neither of those files are there. I though I will just recreate the rules. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
uh, that's really weird, I've tried to replicate the problem but in my case it has kept the files after uninstalling and installing again. But in any case, re-installing the package should install the config files. You can extract the files of the deb and copy the files, just in case dpkg doesn't install them: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I closed the program form the systray. The problems with not opening or coming to front when clicking on the systray icon or taskbar icon on KDE are still there, but that's a really minor thing which doesn't bother me much. Thank you very much! I'm sorry for wasting your time with this. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
no problem @Danny3 ! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
wow kudos for the eBPF port 👏🏻 @themighty1 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Is eBPF monitoring method better than the default one, should we switch to it or alt least test it ? I tried to look online at what is it, but I don't understand how it fits in this specific case with the firewall. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
yes @Danny3 , it's more accurate (in the sense that it's way harder to hide a process from the system), faster (because we receive the PID of a process directly from the kernel) and we need to test it. I've already seen that there're a few race condition bugs, I'll commit a fix soon.
No AFAIK.
It works from kernel >= 4.4. It was introduced some years ago: https://ebpf.io/ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Wow, that's really great ! BTW, I switched to it for testing and I thought I should start clean with the rules, so I tried to delete them all like before, but I noticed a little bug. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Yeah, that's a little bit annoying. You don't have to close the GUI, just clicking on another tab or if a new event arrives the list will refreshed. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Oh, ok, that's even better, thanks ! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Regarding eBPF: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
New features
Improvements
UI
Misc
some translations updated, 2 new added.
Packages:
Install them from a terminal, see how
daemon
GUI
(If the above packages complain about dependencies, use these ones)
This discussion was created from the release v1.4.0-rc.2.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions