-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Re-land] Make prerendering always non-blocking #31268
Merged
jackpope
merged 1 commit into
facebook:main
from
jackpope:reland-nonblocking-sync-prerenders-2
Oct 15, 2024
Merged
[Re-land] Make prerendering always non-blocking #31268
jackpope
merged 1 commit into
facebook:main
from
jackpope:reland-nonblocking-sync-prerenders-2
Oct 15, 2024
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
When a synchronous update suspends, and we prerender the siblings, the prerendering should be non-blocking so that we can immediately restart once the data arrives. This happens automatically when there's a Suspense boundary, because we immediately commit the boundary and then proceed to a Retry render, which are always concurrent. When there's not a Suspense boundary, there is no Retry, so we need to take care to switch from the synchronous work loop to the concurrent one, to enable time slicing.
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
facebook-github-bot
added
the
React Core Team
Opened by a member of the React Core Team
label
Oct 15, 2024
Comparing: 8382581...e7719f5 Critical size changesIncludes critical production bundles, as well as any change greater than 2%:
Significant size changesIncludes any change greater than 0.2%: (No significant changes) |
rickhanlonii
approved these changes
Oct 15, 2024
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 15, 2024
Follows #31238 ___ This is a partial re-land of #31056. We saw breakages surface after the original land and had to revert. Now that they've been fixed, let's try this again. This time we'll split up the commits to give us more control of testing and rollout internally. Original PR: #31056 Original Commit: 4c71025 Revert PR: #31080 Commit description: > When a synchronous update suspends, and we prerender the siblings, the prerendering should be non-blocking so that we can immediately restart once the data arrives. > > This happens automatically when there's a Suspense boundary, because we immediately commit the boundary and then proceed to a Retry render, which are always concurrent. When there's not a Suspense boundary, there is no Retry, so we need to take care to switch from the synchronous work loop to the concurrent one, to enable time slicing. Co-authored-by: Andrew Clark <git@andrewclark.io> DiffTrain build for [6c4bbc7](6c4bbc7)
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 15, 2024
Follows #31238 ___ This is a partial re-land of #31056. We saw breakages surface after the original land and had to revert. Now that they've been fixed, let's try this again. This time we'll split up the commits to give us more control of testing and rollout internally. Original PR: #31056 Original Commit: 4c71025 Revert PR: #31080 Commit description: > When a synchronous update suspends, and we prerender the siblings, the prerendering should be non-blocking so that we can immediately restart once the data arrives. > > This happens automatically when there's a Suspense boundary, because we immediately commit the boundary and then proceed to a Retry render, which are always concurrent. When there's not a Suspense boundary, there is no Retry, so we need to take care to switch from the synchronous work loop to the concurrent one, to enable time slicing. Co-authored-by: Andrew Clark <git@andrewclark.io> DiffTrain build for [6c4bbc7](6c4bbc7)
jackpope
pushed a commit
to jackpope/react
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 25, 2024
…)" This reverts commit 6c4bbc7.
jackpope
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 25, 2024
…1355) This reverts commit 6c4bbc7. It looked like the bug we found on the original land was related to broken product code. But through landing #31268 we found additional bugs internally. Since disabling the feature flag does not fix the bugs, we have to revert again to unblock the sync. We can continue to debug with our internal build.
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 25, 2024
…1355) This reverts commit 6c4bbc7. It looked like the bug we found on the original land was related to broken product code. But through landing #31268 we found additional bugs internally. Since disabling the feature flag does not fix the bugs, we have to revert again to unblock the sync. We can continue to debug with our internal build. DiffTrain build for [cae764c](cae764c)
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 25, 2024
…1355) This reverts commit 6c4bbc7. It looked like the bug we found on the original land was related to broken product code. But through landing #31268 we found additional bugs internally. Since disabling the feature flag does not fix the bugs, we have to revert again to unblock the sync. We can continue to debug with our internal build. DiffTrain build for [cae764c](cae764c)
acdlite
pushed a commit
to acdlite/react
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 7, 2024
…book#31268)" (facebook#31355)" This reverts commit cae764c. This reverts commit 6c4bbc7. It looked like the bug we found on the original land was related to broken product code. But through landing facebook#31268 we found additional bugs internally. Since disabling the feature flag does not fix the bugs, we have to revert again to unblock the sync. We can continue to debug with our internal build.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Follows #31238
This is a partial re-land of #31056. We saw breakages surface after the original land and had to revert. Now that they've been fixed, let's try this again. This time we'll split up the commits to give us more control of testing and rollout internally.
Original PR: #31056
Original Commit: 4c71025
Revert PR: #31080
Commit description: