-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix webcomponent example issue #7056 #7057
Conversation
Thank you for your pull request and welcome to our community. We require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't seem to have you on file. In order for us to review and merge your code, please sign up at https://code.facebook.com/cla - and if you have received this in error or have any questions, please drop us a line at cla@fb.com. Thanks! |
Thank you for signing our Contributor License Agreement. We can now accept your code for this (and any) Facebook open source project. Thanks! |
value: function() { | ||
} | ||
} | ||
,attributeChangedCallback: { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Afaik, we don't need to define createdCallback
, detachedCallback
, nor attributeChangedCallback
. It just makes the example more complicated and detracts from what we're demonstrating. Can you remove these additional functions?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You are correct, they are not required for the purposes of the demonstration, though it is quite nice to have all four callbacks available should someone want to know which ones exist or want to expand upon the example. Also, I didn't see it as complicating the example since they are empty functions but to your point, less code to read is less. I will remove them.
Looks good, thanks! |
fixes issue #7056