Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

--[BE][WIP] - Sensor Wrappers and Wrapper Manager #2518

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jturner65
Copy link
Contributor

Motivation and Context

This PR is Part 2 of the ongoing effort of Sensor refactoring, taking up where Part 1 left off.

Specifically, this PR will provide managed pointer access to sensors similar to how physics object access is provided, via wrappers and a wrapper manager.

How Has This Been Tested

Types of changes

  • Docs change / refactoring / dependency upgrade
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have completed my CLA (see CONTRIBUTING)
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed Do not delete this pull request or issue due to inactivity. label Dec 11, 2024
@jturner65 jturner65 force-pushed the BE_SensorWrapperRefactor branch 3 times, most recently from 9c22d62 to 7f08e44 Compare December 16, 2024 15:11
@jturner65 jturner65 force-pushed the BE_SensorWrapperRefactor branch from 7f08e44 to de8a096 Compare December 19, 2024 13:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed Do not delete this pull request or issue due to inactivity.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants