Pre compute the timestamp range for feature views

[judahrand]

What this PR does / why we need it:
This allows BigQuery to take advantage of Partitions when querying
historical features.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #2083 (doesn't necessarily completely fix but does fix in at least one case)

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

None

[feast-ci-bot]

Hi @judahrand. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a feast-dev member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #2103 (11a695f) into master (5560caf) will decrease coverage by 0.15%.
The diff coverage is 33.33%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2103      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   57.88%   57.73%   -0.16%     
==========================================
  Files         101      101              
  Lines        8176     8205      +29     
==========================================
+ Hits         4733     4737       +4     
- Misses       3443     3468      +25     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	57.73% <33.33%> (-0.16%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
sdk/python/feast/infra/local.py	92.85% <ø> (+5.62%)	⬆️
sdk/python/feast/infra/offline_stores/bigquery.py	31.35% <13.33%> (-1.79%)	⬇️
sdk/python/feast/infra/offline_stores/redshift.py	38.57% <20.00%> (-2.70%)	⬇️
...python/feast/infra/offline_stores/offline_utils.py	44.55% <50.00%> (-0.13%)	⬇️
sdk/python/feast/utils.py	90.00% <75.00%> (-10.00%)	⬇️
sdk/python/feast/infra/online_stores/sqlite.py	95.50% <100.00%> (+0.88%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5560caf...11a695f. Read the comment docs.

[judahrand]

I believe this is functional but it is so hard to tell will how flakey the AWS tests are 😢 Even just what seems like random connection errors.

[pyalex]

/lgtm

[judahrand]

@pyalex Could we get this merged once the tests run. I keep having to merge in conflicts from master. Not sure why the docker build is failing?

[judahrand]

@pyalex all good here

[achals]

/lgtm

[feast-ci-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: achals, judahrand, pyalex

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [achals]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment