Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Respect full_feature_names for ODFVs #2144

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 17, 2021
Merged

Conversation

judahrand
Copy link
Member

@judahrand judahrand commented Dec 14, 2021

Signed-off-by: Judah Rand 17158624+judahrand@users.noreply.github.com

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #2143

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

Respect `full_feature_names` for ODFVs in `get_historical_features`.

@feast-ci-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @judahrand. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a feast-dev member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Signed-off-by: Judah Rand <17158624+judahrand@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Judah Rand <17158624+judahrand@users.noreply.github.com>
@judahrand
Copy link
Member Author

AWS API failing 😢

Copy link
Collaborator

@felixwang9817 felixwang9817 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

Copy link
Collaborator

@felixwang9817 felixwang9817 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

integration tests are failing (finally!) not due to AWS but an actual bug

pretty sure the bug is line 389: you're referencing "conv_rate_plus_100_rounded" directly, when you should be wrapping it with response_feature_name

Signed-off-by: Judah Rand <17158624+judahrand@users.noreply.github.com>
@feast-ci-bot feast-ci-bot removed the lgtm label Dec 17, 2021
@judahrand
Copy link
Member Author

integration tests are failing (finally!) not due to AWS but an actual bug

pretty sure the bug is line 389: you're referencing "conv_rate_plus_100_rounded" directly, when you should be wrapping it with response_feature_name

You're right, missed those! Seems to be passing now! 🥳

Copy link
Collaborator

@felixwang9817 felixwang9817 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@feast-ci-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: felixwang9817, judahrand

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@feast-ci-bot feast-ci-bot merged commit 97fbd3e into feast-dev:master Dec 17, 2021
@judahrand judahrand deleted the odfv branch January 4, 2022 12:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

ODFVs don't respect full_feature_names
4 participants