Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Lotus Gateway: Add missing methods - master #10420

Merged

Conversation

ArseniiPetrovich
Copy link
Contributor

Inspired by #10417 discussions

Related Issues

#10402

Proposed Changes

Add 4 methods to Lotus Gateway:

  • StateNetworkName
  • MpoolGetNonce
  • StateCall
  • StateDecodeParams

Additional Info

Required for Glif.io apps to work properly

Checklist

Before you mark the PR ready for review, please make sure that:

  • Commits have a clear commit message.
  • PR title is in the form of of <PR type>: <area>: <change being made>
    • example: fix: mempool: Introduce a cache for valid signatures
    • PR type: fix, feat, build, chore, ci, docs, perf, refactor, revert, style, test
    • area, e.g. api, chain, state, market, mempool, multisig, networking, paych, proving, sealing, wallet, deps
  • New features have usage guidelines and / or documentation updates in
  • Tests exist for new functionality or change in behavior
  • CI is green

@ArseniiPetrovich ArseniiPetrovich requested a review from a team as a code owner March 8, 2023 15:54
@ArseniiPetrovich ArseniiPetrovich changed the title Add missing methods master fix: Lotus Gateway: Add missing methods - master Mar 8, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@arajasek arajasek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks for the PR!

api/proxy_gen.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@raulk raulk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This LGTM, but @arajasek and @jennijuju should review.

@raulk
Copy link
Member

raulk commented Mar 8, 2023

Adding backport label since @ArseniiPetrovich wants this on Hyperspace too, I believe.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants