Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: chain: make failure to load the chain state fatal #11426

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 29, 2023

Conversation

Stebalien
Copy link
Member

@Stebalien Stebalien commented Nov 16, 2023

Related Issues

Proposed Changes

Make failure to load the chain state fatal. Otherwise, we get strange panics later.

Additional Info

Checklist

Before you mark the PR ready for review, please make sure that:

  • Commits have a clear commit message.
  • PR title is in the form of of <PR type>: <area>: <change being made>
    • example: fix: mempool: Introduce a cache for valid signatures
    • PR type: fix, feat, build, chore, ci, docs, perf, refactor, revert, style, test
    • area, e.g. api, chain, state, market, mempool, multisig, networking, paych, proving, sealing, wallet, deps
  • If the PR affects users (e.g., new feature, bug fix, system requirements change), update the CHANGELOG.md and add details to the UNRELEASED section.
  • New features have usage guidelines and / or documentation updates in
  • Tests exist for new functionality or change in behavior
  • CI is green

Otherwise, we get strange panics later.
@Stebalien Stebalien marked this pull request as ready for review November 16, 2023 14:08
@Stebalien Stebalien requested a review from a team as a code owner November 16, 2023 14:08

chain := store.NewChainStore(cbs, sbs, ds, weight, j)

if err := chain.Load(helpers.LifecycleCtx(mctx, lc)); err != nil {
log.Warnf("loading chain state from disk: %s", err)
return nil, xerrors.Errorf("loading chain state from disk: %w", err)
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Either:

  1. We have a large gap in our tests.
  2. Failing in this case is "just fine".

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note: We'll fail anyways when we call Start below.

Copy link
Contributor

@fridrik01 fridrik01 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@Stebalien Stebalien merged commit afa9568 into master Nov 29, 2023
87 checks passed
@Stebalien Stebalien deleted the steb/fatal-chain-load-error branch November 29, 2023 12:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants