feat(android_alarm_manager_plus): we can now send extra data to alarm manager and receive it in our callback

[smartdevelopers-ir]

Description

Now we can send extra data to alarm manager as Map and also we can receive them in our function callback. For example we can do this :

AndroidAlarmManager.oneShot( Duration(minutes: interval), 25, alarmManagerCallback
      , allowWhileIdle: true, exact: true, rescheduleOnReboot: true,
      params: <String,dynamic>{
    "title":alarmModel.title,
    "message":alarmModel.subTitle,
      });

and in our alarmManagerCallback we can receive the extra params :

@pragma('vm:entry-point')
void  alarmManagerCallback(int id,Map<String,dynamic> params) async{
  print("alarm manager callback title is :${params["title"]}");
}

Related Issues

Issue 990

Checklist

Before you create this PR confirm that it meets all requirements listed below by checking the relevant checkboxes ([x]).
This will ensure a smooth and quick review process.

• I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs.
• My PR includes unit or integration tests for all changed/updated/fixed behaviors (See [Contributor Guide]).
• All existing and new tests are passing.
• I updated the version in pubspec.yaml and CHANGELOG.md.
• I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with ///).
• The analyzer (flutter analyze) does not report any problems on my PR.
• I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide].
• I am willing to follow-up on review comments in a timely manner.

Breaking Change

Does your PR require plugin users to manually update their apps to accommodate your change?

• Yes, this is a breaking change (please indicate a breaking change in CHANGELOG.md and increment major revision).
• No, this is not a breaking change.

[miquelbeltran]

Hey! Due to changes in our contributor guidelines, all PRs should now:

• Have a title that follows the Conventional Commits format. e.g. feat(package_name)!: feature description
• DO NOT modify the CHANGELOG.md or the version in the pubspec.yaml. This is going to be an automated process now.

We would ask you kindly to update the PR following these changes.

Thanks!

[miquelbeltran]

Thanks for your contribution, I understand what is the goal this new feature is trying to accomplish, but I am not sure if the implementation will open for a lot of more bugs (and alarm_manager_plus is already very unstable unfortunately).

Now on the main branch there are integration tests for alarm_manager_plus. I'd like to ask you to merge main into your working branch and give it a go at adding new integration tests that cover this new functionality.

[nohli]

A little nit-picking, but in my opinion the code style should be consistent. Plus the method name that has a typo and could be improved and the test description.

Thanks for fixing, I think we can merge very soon 🙏🏽🥳