Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Workaround intel bug #3652

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Sep 21, 2023
Merged

Workaround intel bug #3652

merged 5 commits into from
Sep 21, 2023

Conversation

gsjaardema
Copy link
Contributor

Potential workaround / restructure for the intel bug that is the cause of #3645.

Make the variable in the external struct instead an embedded static constexpr variable in the only function that uses the variable.

Potential workaround / restructure for the intel bug that is the cause of fmtlib#3645.

Make the variable in the external struct instead an embedded static constexpr variable in the only function that uses the variable.
@gsjaardema gsjaardema closed this Sep 20, 2023
@gsjaardema
Copy link
Contributor Author

Pull request not correct for certain c++ std levels. Will let someone with more knowledge propose a solution.

// For checking rounding thresholds.
// The kth entry is chosen to be the smallest integer such that the
// upper 32-bits of 10^(k+1) times it is strictly bigger than 5 * 10^k.
static constexpr uint32_t fractional_part_rounding_thresholds[8] = {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You need to drop static here:

/Users/runner/work/fmt/fmt/include/fmt/format.h:3268:29: error: definition of a static variable in a constexpr function is a C++2b extension [-Werror,-Wc++2b-extensions]
  static constexpr uint32_t fractional_part_rounding_thresholds[8] = {
                            ^

Also please move to a separate function to avoid parametrization on Float, something like

FMT_CONSTEXPR uint32_t fractional_part_rounding_threshold(int index) {
  constexpr uint32_t thresholds[] = {...};
  return thresholds[index];
}

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@vitaut
Will a non-static constexpr array be optimized by the compiler?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

¯_(ツ)_/¯

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@vitaut

It doesn't get optimized: https://godbolt.org/z/drn31x9zK

Maybe revert this PR?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we should revert this PR but ideas/PRs to optimize it would be welcome.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@vitaut
Solution for GCC, Clang: https://godbolt.org/z/ezj9GhnYW
But not for MSVC (current code: https://godbolt.org/z/5Pxn3zMfT)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have another idea: 06b2038.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@vitaut Solution for GCC, Clang: https://godbolt.org/z/ezj9GhnYW But not for MSVC (current code: https://godbolt.org/z/5Pxn3zMfT)

That looks good. I had something similar but didn't think of the unreachable to quiet the warnings and keep the optimization.

@gsjaardema gsjaardema reopened this Sep 20, 2023
Moved variable out of function to avoid specialization on Float.  Made it a separate function that is called from format_float.
@vitaut vitaut merged commit 7529af8 into fmtlib:master Sep 21, 2023
40 checks passed
@vitaut
Copy link
Contributor

vitaut commented Sep 21, 2023

Thanks

ckerr pushed a commit to transmission/fmt that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2023
* Workaround intel bug

Potential workaround / restructure for the intel bug that is the cause of fmtlib#3645.

Make the variable in the external struct instead an embedded static constexpr variable in the only function that uses the variable.

* Finish the proposed change -- remove struct accessor

* Refactor proposed intel fix.

Moved variable out of function to avoid specialization on Float.  Made it a separate function that is called from format_float.

* Fix incorrect function name.

* Add missing inline.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants