Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revendor gardener/gardener@v1.39 #422

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 24, 2022

Conversation

rfranzke
Copy link
Member

@rfranzke rfranzke commented Jan 20, 2022

How to categorize this PR?

/area security
/kind enhancement
/merge squash

What this PR does / why we need it:
Revendor gardener/gardener@v1.39.

Special notes for your reviewer:
Depends on #403, hence, PR is in draft state.
Depends on gardener/gardener@v1.39 release, hence, PR is in draft state.

Release note:

NONE

@gardener-robot gardener-robot added area/security Security related kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension merge/squash Should be merged via 'Squash and merge' needs/review Needs review size/m Size of pull request is medium (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) labels Jan 20, 2022
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Jan 20, 2022
@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 added needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Jan 20, 2022
@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Jan 20, 2022
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 removed the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Jan 20, 2022
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Jan 22, 2022
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 removed the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Jan 22, 2022
@rfranzke
Copy link
Member Author

/ready
/invite @timuthy

@gardener-robot gardener-robot marked this pull request as ready for review January 24, 2022 11:39
@gardener-robot gardener-robot requested review from a team as code owners January 24, 2022 11:39
@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Jan 24, 2022
@rfranzke
Copy link
Member Author

/cla

@gardener-robot
Copy link

@rfranzke I reached out successfully to the cla-assistant to recheck this pull request.

Copy link
Member

@timuthy timuthy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@gardener-robot gardener-robot added reviewed/lgtm Has approval for merging and removed needs/review Needs review labels Jan 24, 2022
@timuthy timuthy merged commit c5bc4e7 into gardener:master Jan 24, 2022
@rfranzke rfranzke deleted the revendor/gardener-v1.39 branch January 24, 2022 18:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/security Security related kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension merge/squash Should be merged via 'Squash and merge' needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) reviewed/lgtm Has approval for merging size/m Size of pull request is medium (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants