Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Kubernetes Version Configurability per Worker Pool #424

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 10, 2022

Conversation

rfranzke
Copy link
Member

@rfranzke rfranzke commented Jan 22, 2022

How to categorize this PR?

/area usability
/kind enhancement
/platform vsphere
/merge squash

What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR implements support for gardener/gardener's WorkerPoolKubernetesVersion feature gate. Since there is no CSI migration, the only task was adapting the controlpane webhook to use the effective kubelet version when computing the CSI migration feature gates.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Part of gardener/gardener#3501

Special notes for your reviewer:
Depends on #422, hence, PR is in draft state.

Release note:

This extension does now support `gardener/gardener`'s `WorkerPoolKubernetesVersion` feature gate, i.e., having [worker pools with overridden Kubernetes versions](https://github.com/gardener/gardener/blob/8a9c88866ec5fce59b5acf57d4227eeeb73669d7/example/90-shoot.yaml#L69-L70).

@gardener-robot gardener-robot added area/usability Usability related kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension merge/squash Should be merged via 'Squash and merge' platform/vsphere VMware vSphere platform/infrastructure needs/review Needs review labels Jan 22, 2022
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added the size/m Size of pull request is medium (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) label Jan 22, 2022
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Jan 22, 2022
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added size/s Size of pull request is small (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) and removed size/m Size of pull request is medium (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) labels Jan 24, 2022
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Jan 24, 2022
@rfranzke
Copy link
Member Author

/ready

@gardener-robot gardener-robot marked this pull request as ready for review January 24, 2022 19:59
@gardener-robot gardener-robot requested review from a team as code owners January 24, 2022 19:59
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 removed the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Jan 24, 2022
@rfranzke
Copy link
Member Author

/invite @jia-jerry @EmoinLanyu

@gardener-robot
Copy link

@EmoinLanyu, @jia-jerry You have pull request review open invite, please check

@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Feb 9, 2022
@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 removed the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Feb 9, 2022
@EmoinLanyu
Copy link
Contributor

/test

@testmachinery
Copy link

testmachinery bot commented Feb 10, 2022

Testrun: e2e-hmgsx
Workflow: e2e-hmgsx-wf
Phase: Failed

+---------------------+---------------------+--------+----------+
|        NAME         |        STEP         | PHASE  | DURATION |
+---------------------+---------------------+--------+----------+
| infrastructure-test | infrastructure-test | Failed | 4m12s    |
+---------------------+---------------------+--------+----------+

@rfranzke
Copy link
Member Author

Why did this test fail? I can't find any logs 👀 @dguendisch @hendrikKahl

@hendrikKahl
Copy link
Contributor

Why did this test fail? I can't find any logs 👀 @dguendisch @hendrikKahl

The node where the testrun's pod has been scheduled seems to be unhealthy. Promtail get's OOM-killed frequently (though there seems to be no memory pressure) and kubelet is reporting a failure to garbage collect images leading to disk pressure.

@rfranzke
Copy link
Member Author

OK, unrelated to this PR then. Anyways, the infrastructure test or anything related to it is not touched with this PR. @EmoinLanyu Can we proceed?

@EmoinLanyu
Copy link
Contributor

OK, unrelated to this PR then. Anyways, the infrastructure test or anything related to it is not touched with this PR. @EmoinLanyu Can we proceed?

Yes. Infra test is not related, we can proceed.

@EmoinLanyu
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@gardener-robot gardener-robot added reviewed/lgtm Has approval for merging and removed needs/review Needs review labels Feb 10, 2022
@EmoinLanyu EmoinLanyu merged commit 355a6e5 into gardener:master Feb 10, 2022
@rfranzke rfranzke deleted the enh/kubeletversion branch February 10, 2022 07:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/usability Usability related kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension kind/test Test merge/squash Should be merged via 'Squash and merge' needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) platform/vsphere VMware vSphere platform/infrastructure reviewed/lgtm Has approval for merging size/s Size of pull request is small (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants