Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Integrate ocm lib only #837

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 4, 2023
Merged

Conversation

achimweigel
Copy link
Contributor

@achimweigel achimweigel commented Sep 29, 2023

How to categorize this PR?

/area deployers
/kind enhancement
/priority 3

What this PR does / why we need it:

This PR adds the main part of files required to integrate the new OCM lib without changing the current productive coding. This allows the review of follow up PRs.

To speed up the build some new coding is commented out. All these part could be found searching for TODO of NotImplemented.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Release note:

- integrate OCM files

@gardener-prow
Copy link

gardener-prow bot commented Sep 29, 2023

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@gardener-robot gardener-robot added area/deployers Deployer related kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension priority/3 Priority (lower number equals higher priority) needs/review Needs review labels Sep 29, 2023
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Sep 29, 2023
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added size/xl Size of pull request is huge (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) needs/second-opinion Needs second review by someone else labels Sep 29, 2023
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 added needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Sep 29, 2023
@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Sep 29, 2023
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Sep 29, 2023
@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Sep 29, 2023
@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Sep 29, 2023
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 removed the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Sep 29, 2023
@guewa guewa added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Oct 2, 2023
@guewa
Copy link
Contributor

guewa commented Oct 2, 2023

/test all

@gardener-prow
Copy link

gardener-prow bot commented Oct 2, 2023

@guewa: No jobs can be run with /test all.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

  • /test pull-landscaper-e2e-kind

In response to this:

/test all

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@guewa
Copy link
Contributor

guewa commented Oct 2, 2023

/test pull-landscaper-e2e-kind

@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 removed the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Oct 2, 2023
@gardener-prow
Copy link

gardener-prow bot commented Oct 2, 2023

@achimweigel: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-landscaper-e2e-kind 48b5556 link true /test pull-landscaper-e2e-kind

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Command help for this repository.
Please help us cut down on flakes by linking this test failure to an open flake report or filing a new flake report if you can't find an existing one. Also see our testing guideline for how to avoid and hunt flakes.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Oct 2, 2023
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Oct 2, 2023
@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 removed the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Oct 2, 2023
@guewa guewa marked this pull request as ready for review October 2, 2023 12:56
@guewa guewa requested a review from a team as a code owner October 2, 2023 12:56
@guewa guewa requested a review from robertgraeff October 2, 2023 12:56
@guewa guewa added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Oct 2, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@guewa guewa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

all tests passed

Copy link
Collaborator

@fabianburth fabianburth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Appears like no active coding was changed.

@achimweigel achimweigel merged commit 918c259 into gardener:master Oct 4, 2023
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added the status/closed Issue is closed (either delivered or triaged) label Oct 4, 2023
fabianburth added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2023
guewa added a commit to robertgraeff/landscaper that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2023
* fix logging (run-int-tests) (gardener#819)

* Performance Config (gardener#818)

* Deployer config

* Landscaper config

* Metrics in Helm Chart Templates and Values (gardener#821)

* Metrics

* Test (run-int-tests)

* Component Library Flag (gardener#822)

* Flag for component library

* Generate

* Pass component library flag to subobjects

* Default component library

* Generate

* Mark fields as optional (run-int-tests)

* Revert "Component Library Flag (gardener#822)" (gardener#824)

This reverts commit 63a77b1.

* add feedback to proposal (gardener#826)

* OCM Flag (gardener#825)

* OCM flag in context

* OCM flag in landscaper config

* Generate

* OCM flag in deployer config

* Generate (run-int-tests)

* Proposal timeouts and typical error page (gardener#823)

* timeout proposal

* Release v0.78.0

* Prepare next Dev Cycle v0.79.0-dev

* update pipeline definition (gardener#829)

* fix blueprint docu (gardener#832)

* Fix pipeline (gardener#835)

* adjust pipeline to run with specific component lib version
(run-int-tests)

* minor adjustments

* (run-int-tests)

* update pipeline definition for head updates (gardener#830)

* update pipeline definition for head updates

* update pipeline for release jobs

* fix dependency relationship for update release

* Pipeline fix (gardener#836)

* fix pipeline

* (run-int-tests)

* Update .ci/pipeline_definitions

Co-authored-by: Johannes Aubart <johannes.aubart@sap.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Johannes Aubart <johannes.aubart@sap.com>

* true in pipeline definition converted to True (gardener#839)

* Integrate ocm lib only  (gardener#837)

* ocm-lib-test (run-int-tests)

* (run-int-tests)

---------

Co-authored-by: Fabian Burth <fabian.burth@sap.com>

* USE_OCM_LIB parameter for local int tests (gardener#846)

---------

Co-authored-by: achimweigel <achim.weigel@sap.com>
Co-authored-by: Robert Gräff <robert.graeff@sap.com>
Co-authored-by: gardener-robot-ci-3 <gardener.ci.user3@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: gardener-robot-ci-2 <gardener.ci.user2@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Fabian Burth <fabian.burth@sap.com>
Co-authored-by: Johannes Aubart <johannes.aubart@sap.com>
@fabianburth fabianburth mentioned this pull request Nov 15, 2023
@achimweigel achimweigel deleted the integrate-ocm-lib branch February 7, 2024 06:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/deployers Deployer related kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) needs/review Needs review needs/second-opinion Needs second review by someone else priority/3 Priority (lower number equals higher priority) reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) size/xl Size of pull request is huge (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) status/closed Issue is closed (either delivered or triaged)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants