Revert "fix: Incorrect parsing of functional pseudo class css selector (#169)" #182
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
* Fix known issues * Run format * Fix linting errors * Add comment in code for source of match logic * Add changeset
* better splitting of selectors - overlapping with rrweb-io#1401 * Add test from example at PostHog/posthog#21427 * ignore brackets inside selector strings * Add another test as noticed that it's possible to escape strings * Ensure we are ignoring commas within strings Co-authored-by: Eoghan Murray <eoghan@getthere.ie>
c298lee
approved these changes
Apr 19, 2024
billyvg
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 5, 2024
billyvg
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 7, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This reverts commit 810b39f.
Reverting this in favor of rrweb-io#1401 and rrweb-io#1440 which is better than whatever it is I wrote. I kept our tests just to ensure the fix is compatible with our previous patch.