Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Second attempt to use --codescanning-config flag of CLI #957

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 2, 2022

Conversation

edoardopirovano
Copy link
Contributor

Reverts #936, thus re-introducing the changes from #830.

The previous attempt to roll this out failed due to some users having invalid properties in their config files and the CLI version of the parsing not being tolerant to unknown fields. This was fixed in 2.8.2, so we can try this again now.

The first commit is a clean revert of the revert. The second commit bumps the version flag so we don't try to use the CLI to parse the config file if it is a version from before 2.8.2 which contained the aforementioned fix.

Merge / deployment checklist

  • Confirm this change is backwards compatible with existing workflows.
  • Confirm the readme has been updated if necessary.
  • Confirm the changelog has been updated if necessary.

@edoardopirovano edoardopirovano requested a review from a team as a code owner March 1, 2022 14:39
Copy link
Contributor

@aeisenberg aeisenberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Similar to previous PR, which I approved. Looks fine to me.

@edoardopirovano edoardopirovano merged commit e4766c8 into main Mar 2, 2022
@edoardopirovano edoardopirovano deleted the edoardo/reuse-codescanning-config branch March 2, 2022 00:27
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Mar 7, 2022
5 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants