Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(cmd/gno): allow dirs and arbitrary expressions on gno run #988

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 23, 2023

Conversation

thehowl
Copy link
Member

@thehowl thehowl commented Jul 22, 2023

extend the capabilities of gno run to allow for passing directories, running non-main packages, and executing arbitrary expression. should make for a better general interactive testing experience.

cc/ @ilgooz, this should be a step in a good direction to add support for executing individual functions in IDE and playground.

Checklists...

Contributors Checklist

  • Added new tests, or not needed, or not feasible
  • Provided an example (e.g. screenshot) to aid review or the PR is self-explanatory
  • Updated the official documentation or not needed
  • No breaking changes were made, or a BREAKING CHANGE: xxx message was included in the description
  • Added references to related issues and PRs
  • Provided any useful hints for running manual tests
  • Added new benchmarks to generated graphs, if any. More info here.

@thehowl thehowl added the 📦 🤖 gnovm Issues or PRs gnovm related label Jul 22, 2023
@thehowl thehowl self-assigned this Jul 22, 2023
@thehowl thehowl requested a review from a team as a code owner July 22, 2023 15:58
@moul
Copy link
Member

moul commented Jul 23, 2023

Awesome, thanks.

Related with #982, cc @ajnavarro

@moul moul merged commit 4df47de into gnolang:master Jul 23, 2023
@moul moul added this to the 🌟 main.gno.land (wanted) milestone Sep 8, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
📦 🤖 gnovm Issues or PRs gnovm related
Projects
Archived in project
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants