Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Exponential Backoff for ByteFIFO (#15724) #15793

Conversation

6543
Copy link
Member

@6543 6543 commented May 8, 2021

Backport #15724

This PR is another in the vein of queue improvements. It suggests an
exponential backoff for bytefifo queues to reduce the load from queue
polling. This will mostly be useful for redis queues.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton art27@cantab.net

This PR is another in the vein of queue improvements. It suggests an
exponential backoff for bytefifo queues to reduce the load from queue
polling. This will mostly be useful for redis queues.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>

Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
@6543 6543 added type/enhancement An improvement of existing functionality performance/cpu labels May 8, 2021
@6543 6543 added this to the 1.14.2 milestone May 8, 2021
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. label May 8, 2021
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels May 8, 2021
@techknowlogick techknowlogick merged commit d644709 into go-gitea:release/v1.14 May 8, 2021
@6543 6543 deleted the backport_15724_exponential-backoff-for-bytefifo branch May 8, 2021 18:28
@go-gitea go-gitea locked and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 19, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. performance/cpu type/enhancement An improvement of existing functionality
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants