-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
Go 1.11 Modules (vgo) vs dep #1959
Comments
hi, thank you! Unfortunately, the talk video got lost 😭 i'm going to be re-recording it as a screencast, though, including some epiphanies sparked by discussions after the talk. i think it'll be even better 😄 i realize that guidance on these sorts of questions has been in short supply in the recent months. There actually IS more coming now, though. To that end, my TODO list looks something like this:
Items 3 and 4 will make guidance clearer on questions of what to use, i think. And, frustrating as it is, it'll be clear in retrospect why we needed to get our ducks in a row. Right now, i can say that dep will absolutely be adapting to the new world, and it won't hurt you to continue using it. |
This advice is at best misleading. Once Go 1.11 is out, it really makes very little sense for a new project not already using dep to start using it. Dep has many, many problems - some of which Sam acknowledged in the talk - and you avoid all of them, avoid taking the time to master a system that is going away, and help make Go modules better by simply using Go modules from the start. Kubernetes, for example, is planning to jump straight from godep to Go modules, skipping dep entirely. They actually spent quite a lot of effort trying to figure out how to migrate to dep and could not quite make it work. If you're already using dep, then it makes sense to keep using it until you're ready to make the switch - no one likes forced upgrades after all - but I think the vast majority of dep users will be very happy with the conversion to Go modules, especially since everything is integrated more smoothly into the go command.
|
@rsc Thanks for the update. I've been reading your blog posts and watched your SG keynote to try and get up to speed. I suppose August is quite close so one could reasonably go with tip but as you said yourself:
Couldn't an organization just choose the package file style they prefer? That is, with Gopkg.toml being the only encouraged alternative, the rest deprecated and slated for removal. Or is there a roadmap in which these other file types would also be removed from Without knowing the intricacies this seems to be a sort of yarn vs npm style scenario. |
@rsc I just went through this and its been a bit of a mess. Yes, yes I know experimental software. But go 1.11 // July 31 is coming very soon and go modules are still are still shaky. my team is considering going back to dep and revisiting in 6 months. Issues we hit along the way -
2 was especially annoying because we just go get vgo in our ci pipeline. so one day builds started failing because latest commit of vgo had the protocol change. These aren't fundamental problems with go modules. These are signs of a product that are not ready for launch and I would advise any team to stick with what you got till things firm up. |
@trashhalo Have you tried go modules recently? How has the released 1.11 version held up? |
Are there more subcommands coming to go mod or the api has already stabilized?? |
Dep was officially deprecated earlier this year, and the proposal to archive this repository was accepted. As such, I'm closing outstanding issues before archiving the repository. For any further comments, please use the proposal thread on the Go issue tracker. Thanks! |
@sdboyer Thank you for your talk Jul 18 at the GoSF meetup!
Could we get an official tldr; about how to treat
golang/dep
in the mean time as go 1.11 modules becomes production worthy? Should new repos standardize on dep or vgo for example? What is your best advice you'd give to a new person who is just starting out in golang?As well any links to a video of the talk?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: