Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

x/vulndb: potential Go vuln in github.com/envoyproxy/envoy: CVE-2019-9900 #2260

Closed
tatianab opened this issue Nov 8, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

x/vulndb: potential Go vuln in github.com/envoyproxy/envoy: CVE-2019-9900 #2260

tatianab opened this issue Nov 8, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
excluded: LEGACY_FALSE_POSITIVE (DO NOT USE) Vulnerability marked as false positive before we introduced the triage process

Comments

@tatianab
Copy link
Contributor

tatianab commented Nov 8, 2023

CVE-2019-9900 references github.com/envoyproxy/envoy, which may be a Go module.

Description:
When parsing HTTP/1.x header values, Envoy 1.9.0 and before does not reject embedded zero characters (NUL, ASCII 0x0). This allows remote attackers crafting header values containing embedded NUL characters to potentially bypass header matching rules, gaining access to unauthorized resources.

References:

Cross references:

See doc/triage.md for instructions on how to triage this report.

modules:
    - module: github.com/envoyproxy/envoy
      vulnerable_at: 1.28.0
      packages:
        - package: n/a
cves:
    - CVE-2019-9900
references:
    - web: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0741
    - web: https://www.envoyproxy.io/docs/envoy/v1.9.1/intro/version_history
    - report: https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy/issues/6434
    - web: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/envoy-announce/VoHfnDqZiAM
    - advisory: https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy/security/advisories/GHSA-x74r-f4mw-c32h
@tatianab tatianab added the excluded: LEGACY_FALSE_POSITIVE (DO NOT USE) Vulnerability marked as false positive before we introduced the triage process label Nov 8, 2023
@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Change https://go.dev/cl/540721 mentions this issue: data/excluded: batch add 135 excluded reports

This was referenced Feb 10, 2024
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
This was referenced Apr 10, 2024
Closed
Closed
@GoVulnBot GoVulnBot mentioned this issue Apr 18, 2024
Closed
This was referenced Jun 7, 2024
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
@GoVulnBot GoVulnBot mentioned this issue Jul 1, 2024
Closed
This was referenced Sep 20, 2024
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
This was referenced Dec 18, 2024
Closed
Closed
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
excluded: LEGACY_FALSE_POSITIVE (DO NOT USE) Vulnerability marked as false positive before we introduced the triage process
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@tatianab @gopherbot