Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

x/vulndb: potential Go vuln in github.com/envoyproxy/envoy: CVE-2022-21657 #336

Closed
GoVulnBot opened this issue Feb 22, 2022 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
excluded: NOT_GO_CODE This vulnerability does not refer to a Go module.

Comments

@GoVulnBot
Copy link

In CVE-2022-21657, the reference URL github.com/envoyproxy/envoy (and possibly others) refers to something in Go.

module: github.com/envoyproxy/envoy
package: envoy
description: |
    Envoy is an open source edge and service proxy, designed for cloud-native applications. In affected versions Envoy does not restrict the set of certificates it accepts from the peer, either as a TLS client or a TLS server, to only those certificates that contain the necessary extendedKeyUsage (id-kp-serverAuth and id-kp-clientAuth, respectively). This means that a peer may present an e-mail certificate (e.g. id-kp-emailProtection), either as a leaf certificate or as a CA in the chain, and it will be accepted for TLS. This is particularly bad when combined with the issue described in pull request #630, in that it allows a Web PKI CA that is intended only for use with S/MIME, and thus exempted from audit or supervision, to issue TLS certificates that will be accepted by Envoy. As a result Envoy will trust upstream certificates that should not be trusted. There are no known workarounds to this issue. Users are advised to upgrade.
cves:
  - CVE-2022-21657
links:
    pr: https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy/pull/630
    context:
      - https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy/security/advisories/GHSA-837m-wjrv-vm5g

See doc/triage.md for instructions on how to triage this report.

@julieqiu julieqiu self-assigned this Feb 23, 2022
@julieqiu
Copy link
Member

Not Go code.

@neild neild added excluded: NOT_GO_CODE This vulnerability does not refer to a Go module. and removed NotGoVuln labels Aug 10, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
excluded: NOT_GO_CODE This vulnerability does not refer to a Go module.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants