Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

x/vulndb: potential Go vuln in github.com/envoyproxy/envoy: CVE-2024-32475 #2735

Closed
GoVulnBot opened this issue Apr 18, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
excluded: NOT_GO_CODE This vulnerability does not refer to a Go module.

Comments

@GoVulnBot
Copy link

CVE-2024-32475 references github.com/envoyproxy/envoy, which may be a Go module.

Description:
Envoy is a cloud-native, open source edge and service proxy. When an upstream TLS cluster is used with auto_sni enabled, a request containing a host/:authority header longer than 255 characters triggers an abnormal termination of Envoy process. Envoy does not gracefully handle an error when setting SNI for outbound TLS connection. The error can occur when Envoy attempts to use the host/:authority header value longer than 255 characters as SNI for outbound TLS connection. SNI length is limited to 255 characters per the standard. Envoy always expects this operation to succeed and abnormally aborts the process when it fails. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.30.1, 1.29.4, 1.28.3, and 1.27.5.

References:

Cross references:

See doc/triage.md for instructions on how to triage this report.

id: GO-ID-PENDING
modules:
    - module: github.com/envoyproxy/envoy
      vulnerable_at: 1.30.0
      packages:
        - package: envoy
summary: CVE-2024-32475 in github.com/envoyproxy/envoy
cves:
    - CVE-2024-32475
references:
    - advisory: https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy/security/advisories/GHSA-3mh5-6q8v-25wj
    - fix: https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy/commit/b47fc6648d7c2dfe0093a601d44cb704b7bad382
source:
    id: CVE-2024-32475

@jba jba self-assigned this Apr 19, 2024
@jba jba removed their assignment Jun 4, 2024
@tatianab tatianab added excluded: NOT_GO_CODE This vulnerability does not refer to a Go module. and removed possibly not Go labels Jun 5, 2024
@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Change https://go.dev/cl/590855 mentions this issue: data/excluded: add 20 excluded reports

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
excluded: NOT_GO_CODE This vulnerability does not refer to a Go module.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants