French translation

.operations/writing-guidelines.french.md

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+# Notre manifeste de rédaction de contenu
+
+Comment nous améliorons l'expérience de lecture et l'apprentissage pour nos visiteurs.
+
+## 1. La simplicité vaut mieux que la perfection
+
+Faciliter la lecture et l'absorption des connaissances est notre mission, nous en organisons son contenu. En tant que tels, nous nous concentrons sur la transformation des sujets complexes et difficiles en une liste simplifiée, nous traitons les informations trop volumineuses avec du contenu plus courts et moins précis, nous évitons les sujets ‘qui mettent de l'huile sur le feu’ ou controversés et nous évitons les idées subjectives au profit de pratiques généralement acceptées.
+
+## 2. Se baser sur des faits probants et fiables
+
+Nos lecteurs doivent être persuadés que le contenu qu'ils parcourent est fiable. Pour ce faire, nous incluons des données probantes comme des références, des données et d'autres ressources disponibles à ce sujet. Dans la pratique, nous essayons d'inclure des citations provenant de sources fiables, de montrer des benchmarks, des modèles de conception connexes ou toute autre mesure scientifique pour prouver les affirmations.
+
+## 3. MECE (Mutuellement Exclusif Collectivement Exhaustif)
+
+En plus d'être d'une grande fiabilité et d'une grande qualité rédactionnelle, le fait de parcourir le contenu devrait également permettre de couvrir l'ensemble du sujet. Aucun sous-thème important ne doit être laissé de côté.
+
+## 4. Formatage cohérent
+
+Le contenu est présenté à l'aide de modèles prédéfinis. Tout contenu futur doit être conforme au même modèle. Si vous souhaitez ajouter de nouveaux points, copiez le format d'un point existant et complétez-le selon vos besoins. Pour plus d'informations, veuillez consulter [ce modèle](https://github.com/goldbergyoni/nodebestpractices/blob/master/sections/template.md).
+
+## 5. C'est à propos de Node.js
+
+Chaque conseil doit être directement lié à Node.js et non au développement de logiciels en général. Lorsque nous conseillons d'implémenter un modèle/une règle générique dans Node.js, le contenu doit se concentrer sur l'implémentation dans Node. Par exemple, lorsque nous conseillons de nettoyer toutes les requêtes saisies pour des raisons de sécurité, il convient d'utiliser Node-lingo - ‘Utiliser un middleware pour nettoyer les requêtes saisies’. Si un élément n'a pas d'implémentation spécifique dans Node.js (par exemple, il est identique dans Python & Jaba) - incluez-le dans un élément de conteneur générique, voir l'article 6.5 par exemple.
+
+## 6. Uniquement les fournisseurs majeurs
+
+Il est parfois utile d'inclure des noms de fournisseurs qui peuvent répondre à certains défis et problèmes comme les paquets npm, les outils open source ou même les produits commerciaux. Afin d'éviter des listes trop longues ou de recommander des projets peu fiables et instables, nous avons élaboré les règles suivantes :
+
+- Seuls les 3 premiers fournisseurs devraient être recommandés - un fournisseur qui apparaît dans les 3 premiers résultats d'un moteur de recherche (Google ou GitHub triés par popularité) pour un mot clé pertinent donné peut être inclus dans notre recommandation.
+- S'il s'agit d'un paquet npm, il doit également être téléchargé au moins 750 fois par jour en moyenne.
+- S'il s'agit d'un projet open-source, il doit avoir été mis à jour au moins une fois au cours des 6 derniers mois.

sections/codestylepractices/eslint_prettier.french.md

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+# Utilisez ESLint et Prettier
+
+
+### Comparaison d'ESLint et de Prettier
+
+Si vous formatez ce code à l'aide d'ESLint, il vous avertira simplement qu'il est trop large (dépend de votre paramètre `max-len`). Prettier le formatera automatiquement pour vous.
+
+```javascript
+foo(reallyLongArg(), omgSoManyParameters(), IShouldRefactorThis(), isThereSeriouslyAnotherOne(), noWayYouGottaBeKiddingMe());
+```
+
+```javascript
+foo(
+  reallyLongArg(),
+  omgSoManyParameters(),
+  IShouldRefactorThis(),
+  isThereSeriouslyAnotherOne(),
+  noWayYouGottaBeKiddingMe()
+);
+```
+
+Source : [https://github.com/prettier/prettier-eslint/issues/101](https://github.com/prettier/prettier-eslint/issues/101)
+
+### Intégration d'ESLint et de Prettier
+
+ESLint et Prettier se recoupent dans la fonction de formatage du code mais ils peuvent être facilement combinés en utilisant d'autres packages comme [prettier-eslint](https://github.com/prettier/prettier-eslint), [eslint-plugin-prettier](https://github.com/prettier/eslint-plugin-prettier) et [eslint-config-prettier](https://github.com/prettier/eslint-config-prettier). Pour plus d'informations sur leurs différences, vous pouvez consulter le lien [ici](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44690308/whats-the-difference-between-prettier-eslint-eslint-plugin-prettier-and-eslint).

sections/docker/avoid-build-time-secrets.french.md

@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
+# Clean build-time secrets, avoid secrets as args
+
+<br/><br/>
+
+### One Paragraph Explainer
+
+
+A Docker image isn't just a bunch of files but rather multiple layers revealing what happened during build-time. In a very common scenario, developers need the npm token during build time (mostly for private registries) - this is falsely achieved by passing the token as a build time args. It might seem innocent and safe, however this token can now be fetched from the developer's machine Docker history, from the Docker registry and the CI. An attacker who gets access to that token is now capable of writing into the organization private npm registry. There are two more secured alternatives: The flawless one is using Docker --secret feature (experimental as of July 2020) which allows mounting a file during build time only. The second approach is using multi-stage build with args, building and then copying only the necessary files to production. The last technique will not ship the secrets with the images but will appear in the local Docker history - This is typically considered as secured enough for most organizations.
+
+<br/><br/>
+
+### Code Example – Using Docker mounted secrets (experimental but stable)
+
+<details>
+
+<summary><strong>Dockerfile</strong></summary>
+
+```
+# syntax = docker/dockerfile:1.0-experimental
+
+FROM node:12-slim
+WORKDIR /usr/src/app
+COPY package.json package-lock.json ./
+RUN --mount=type=secret,id=npm,target=/root/.npmrc npm ci
+
+# The rest comes here
+```
+
+</details>
+
+<br/><br/>
+
+### Code Example – Building securely using multi-stage build
+
+<details>
+
+<summary><strong>Dockerfile</strong></summary>
+
+```
+
+FROM node:12-slim AS build
+ARG NPM_TOKEN
+WORKDIR /usr/src/app
+COPY . /dist
+RUN echo "//registry.npmjs.org/:\_authToken=\$NPM_TOKEN" > .npmrc && \
+ npm ci --production && \
+ rm -f .npmrc
+
+FROM build as prod
+COPY --from=build /dist /dist
+CMD ["node","index.js"]
+
+# The ARG and .npmrc won't appear in the final image but can be found in the Docker daemon un-tagged images list - make sure to delete those
+```
+
+</details>
+
+<br/><br/>
+
+### Code Example Anti Pattern – Using build time args
+
+<details>
+
+<summary><strong>Dockerfile</strong></summary>
+
+```
+
+FROM node:12-slim
+ARG NPM_TOKEN
+WORKDIR /usr/src/app
+COPY . /dist
+RUN echo "//registry.npmjs.org/:\_authToken=\$NPM_TOKEN" > .npmrc && \
+ npm ci --production && \
+ rm -f .npmrc
+
+# Deleting the .npmrc within the same copy command will not save it inside the layer, however it can be found in image history
+
+CMD ["node","index.js"]
+```
+
+</details>
+
+<br/><br/>
+
+### Blog Quote: "These secrets aren’t saved in the final Docker"
+
+From the blog, [Alexandra Ulsh](https://www.alexandraulsh.com/2019/02/24/docker-build-secrets-and-npmrc/?fbclid=IwAR0EAr1nr4_QiGzlNQcQKkd9rem19an9atJRO_8-n7oOZXwprToFQ53Y0KQ)
+
+> In November 2018 Docker 18.09 introduced a new --secret flag for docker build. This allows us to pass secrets from a file to our Docker builds. These secrets aren’t saved in the final Docker image, any intermediate images, or the image commit history. With build secrets, you can now securely build Docker images with private npm packages without build arguments and multi-stage builds.
+
+```
+
+```

sections/docker/bootstrap-using-node.french.md

@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+# Bootstrap container using node command instead of npm
+
+## One paragraph explainer
+
+We are used to see code examples where folks start their app using `CMD 'npm start'`. This is a bad practice. The `npm` binary will not forward signals to your app which prevents graceful shutdown (see [/sections/docker/graceful-shutdown.md]). If you are using child-processes they won’t be cleaned up correctly in case of unexpected shutdown, leaving zombie processes on your host. `npm start` also results in having an extra process for no benefit. To start you app use `CMD ['node','server.js']`. If your app spawns child-processes also use `TINI` as an entrypoint.
+
+### Code example - Bootsraping using Node
+
+```dockerfile
+
+FROM node:12-slim AS build
+
+
+WORKDIR /usr/src/app
+COPY package.json package-lock.json ./
+RUN npm ci --production && npm clean cache --force
+
+CMD ["node", "server.js"]
+```
+
+
+### Code example - Using Tiny as entrypoint
+
+```dockerfile
+
+FROM node:12-slim AS build
+
+# Add Tini if using child-processes
+ENV TINI_VERSION v0.19.0
+ADD https://github.com/krallin/tini/releases/download/${TINI_VERSION}/tini /tini
+RUN chmod +x /tini
+
+WORKDIR /usr/src/app
+COPY package.json package-lock.json ./
+RUN npm ci --production && npm clean cache --force
+
+ENTRYPOINT ["/tini", "--"]
+
+CMD ["node", "server.js"]
+```
+
+### Antipatterns
+
+Using npm start
+```dockerfile
+
+FROM node:12-slim AS build
+WORKDIR /usr/src/app
+COPY package.json package-lock.json ./
+RUN npm ci --production && npm cache clean --force
+
+# don’t do that!
+CMD "npm start"
+```
+
+Using node in a single string will start a bash/ash shell process to execute your command. That is almost the same as using `npm`
+
+```dockerfile
+
+FROM node:12-slim AS build
+WORKDIR /usr/src/app
+COPY package.json package-lock.json ./
+RUN npm ci --production && npm clean cache --force
+
+# don’t do that, it will start bash
+CMD "node server.js"
+```
+
+Starting with npm, here’s the process tree:
+```
+$ ps falx
+  UID   PID  PPID   COMMAND
+    0     1     0   npm
+    0    16     1   sh -c node server.js
+    0    17    16    \_ node server.js
+```
+There is no advantage to those two extra processes.
+
+Sources:
+
+
+https://maximorlov.com/process-signals-inside-docker-containers/
+
+
+https://github.com/nodejs/docker-node/blob/master/docs/BestPractices.md#handling-kernel-signals

sections/docker/clean-cache.french.md

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+# Clean NODE_MODULE cache
+
+<br/><br/>
+
+### One Paragraph Explainer
+
+Node package managers, npm & Yarn, cache the installed packages locally so that future projects which need the same libraries won't need to fetch from a remote repository. Although this duplicates the packages and consumes more storage - it pays off in a local development environment that typically keeps installing the same packages. In a Docker container this storage increase is worthless since it installs the dependency only once. By removing this cache, using a single line of code, tens of MB are shaved from the image. While doing so, ensure that it doesn't exit with non-zero code and fail the CI build because of caching issues - This can be avoided by including the --force flag.
+
+*Please not that this is not relevant if you are using a multi-stage build as long as you don't install new packages in the last stage*
+
+<br/><br/>
+
+### Code Example – Clean cache
+
+<details>
+<summary><strong>Dockerfile</strong></summary>
+
+```
+FROM node:12-slim AS build
+WORKDIR /usr/src/app
+COPY package.json package-lock.json ./
+RUN npm ci --production && npm cache clean --force
+
+# The rest comes here
+```
+
+</details>

sections/docker/docker-ignore.french.md

@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+# Use .dockerignore to prevent leaking secrets
+
+<br/><br/>
+
+### One Paragraph Explainer
+
+The Docker build command copies the local files into the build context environment over a virtual network. Be careful - development and CI folders contain secrets like .npmrc, .aws, .env files and other sensitive files. Consequently, Docker images might hold secrets and expose them in unsafe territories (e.g. Docker repository, partners servers). In a better world the Dockerfile should be explicit about what is being copied. On top of this include a .dockerignore file that acts as the last safety net that filters out unnecessary folders and potential secrets. Doing so also boosts the build speed - By leaving out common development folders that have no use in production (e.g. .git, test results, IDE configuration), the builder can better utilize the cache and achieve better performance
+
+<br/><br/>
+
+### Code Example – A good default .dockerignore for Node.js
+
+<details>
+<summary><strong>.dockerignore</strong></summary>
+
+```
+**/node_modules/
+**/.git
+**/README.md
+**/LICENSE
+**/.vscode
+**/npm-debug.log
+**/coverage
+**/.env
+**/.editorconfig
+**/.aws
+**/dist
+```
+
+</details>
+
+<br/><br/>
+
+### Code Example Anti-Pattern – Recursive copy of all files
+
+<details>
+<summary><strong>Dockerfile</strong></summary>
+
+```
+FROM node:12-slim AS build
+WORKDIR /usr/src/app
+# The next line copies everything
+COPY . .
+
+# The rest comes here
+
+```
+
+</details>

sections/docker/generic-tips.french.md

@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+[✔]: ../../assets/images/checkbox-small-blue.png
+
+# Common Node.js Docker best practices
+
+This common Docker guidelines section contains best practices that are standardized among all programming languages and have no special Node.js interpretation
+
+## ![✔] Prefer COPY over ADD command
+
+**TL;DR:** COPY is safer as it copies local files only while ADD supports fancier fetches like downloading binaries from remote sites
+
+## ![✔] Avoid updating the base OS
+
+**TL;DR:** Updating the local binaries during build (e.g. apt-get update) creates inconsistent images every time it runs and also demands elevated privileges. Instead use base images that are updated frequently
+
+## ![✔] Classify images using labels
+
+**TL;DR:** Providing metadata for each image might help Ops professionals treat it adequately. For example, include the maintainer name, build date and other information that might prove useful when someone needs to reason about an image
+
+## ![✔] Use unprivileged containers
+
+**TL;DR:** Privileged container have the same permissions and capabilities as the root user over the host machine. This is rarely needed and as a rule of thumb one should use the 'node' user that is created within official Node images
+
+## ![✔] Inspect and verify the final result
+
+**TL;DR:** Sometimes it's easy to overlook side effects in the build process like leaked secrets or unnecessary files. Inspecting the produced image using tools like [Dive](https://github.com/wagoodman/dive) can easily help to identify such issues
+
+## ![✔] Perform integrity check
+
+**TL;DR:** While pulling base or final images, the network might be mislead and redirected to download malicious images. Nothing in the standard Docker protocol prevents this unless signing and verifying the content. [Docker Notary](https://docs.docker.com/notary/getting_started/) is one of the tools to achieve this