PreferJavaTimeOverload generates false positive with jOOQ DSL.val()

[niktekusho]

Description of the problem / feature request:

This issue is very similar to #1504.
When I use Jooq's DSL.val(0), ErrorProne emits the PreferJavaTimeOverload warning.
[PreferJavaTimeOverload] If the numeric primitive (0) represents a Instant, please call DSL.val(Instant) instead.
I don't think ErrorProne should emit the warning since DSL.val returns an object with the same generic type:

• DSL.val(int) returns Field<Integer>
• while DSL.val(Instant) returns Field<Instant>.

Bugs: what's the simplest, easiest way to reproduce this bug? Please provide a minimal example if possible.

Simply call DSL.val(0).

What version of Error Prone are you using?

2.3.4

Have you found anything relevant by searching the web?

Looking through ErrorProne's issues, I saw #1504, which is very similar to my case.

Since the fix to this issue is virtually the same as #1511, should I open a PR with the fix?

[kluever]

Thanks for the report - I'll get this fixed up internally.

[kluever]

(Planning on just ignoring any static methods on the entire DSL class.)