Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Georama 1.000 #2578

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 29, 2020
Merged

Georama 1.000 #2578

merged 2 commits into from
Jul 29, 2020

Conversation

yanone
Copy link
Collaborator

@yanone yanone commented Jul 28, 2020

Upstream: https://github.com/productiontype/Georama
My contributions are merged as I worked directly on the repo.

@m4rc1e
Copy link
Collaborator

m4rc1e commented Jul 28, 2020

Fontbakery report

Fontbakery version: 0.7.29

[1] Family checks
WARN: Is the command `ftxvalidator` (Apple Font Tool Suite) available?
--- Rationale ---

There's no reasonable (and legal) way to run the command `ftxvalidator` of the
Apple Font Tool Suite on a non-macOS machine. I.e. on GNU+Linux or Windows etc.

If Font Bakery is not running on an OSX machine, the machine running Font
Bakery could access `ftxvalidator` on OSX, e.g. via ssh or a remote procedure
call (rpc).

There's an ssh example implementation at:
https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/blob/master/prebuilt/workarounds
/ftxvalidator/ssh-implementation/ftxvalidator


  • WARN Could not find ftxvalidator.

[7] Georama-Italic[wdth,wght].ttf
WARN: Check copyright namerecords match license file.
--- Rationale ---

A known licensing description must be provided in the NameID 14 (LICENSE
DESCRIPTION) entries of the name table.

The source of truth for this check (to determine which license is in use) is a
file placed side-by-side to your font project including the licensing terms.

Depending on the chosen license, one of the following string snippets is
expected to be found on the NameID 13 (LICENSE DESCRIPTION) entries of the name
table:
- "This Font Software is licensed under the SIL Open Font License, Version 1.1.
This license is available with a FAQ at: https://scripts.sil.org/OFL"
- "Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0"
- "Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0."


Currently accepted licenses are Apache or Open Font License.
For a small set of legacy families the Ubuntu Font License may be acceptable as
well.

When in doubt, please choose OFL for new font projects.


  • WARN Please consider using HTTPS URLs at name table entry [plat=3, enc=1, name=13] [code: http-in-description]
  • WARN For now we're still accepting http URLs, but you should consider using https instead.
    [code: http]
WARN: License URL matches License text on name table?
--- Rationale ---

A known license URL must be provided in the NameID 14 (LICENSE INFO URL) entry
of the name table.

The source of truth for this check is the licensing text found on the NameID 13
entry (LICENSE DESCRIPTION).

The string snippets used for detecting licensing terms are:
- "This Font Software is licensed under the SIL Open Font License, Version 1.1.
This license is available with a FAQ at: https://scripts.sil.org/OFL"
- "Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0"
- "Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0."


Currently accepted licenses are Apache or Open Font License.
For a small set of legacy families the Ubuntu Font License may be acceptable as
well.

When in doubt, please choose OFL for new font projects.


  • WARN Please consider using HTTPS URLs at name table entry [plat=3, enc=1, name=13] [code: http-in-description]
  • WARN Please consider using HTTPS URLs at name table entry [plat=3, enc=1, name=13] [code: http-in-description]
  • WARN Please consider using HTTPS URLs at name table entry [plat=3, enc=1, name=13] [code: http-in-description]
  • WARN Please consider using HTTPS URLs at name table entry [plat=3, enc=1, name=14] [code: http-in-license-info]
  • WARN For now we're still accepting http URLs, but you should consider using https instead.
    [code: http]
WARN: METADATA.pb: Fontfamily is listed on Google Fonts API?
WARN: Are there caret positions declared for every ligature?
--- Rationale ---

All ligatures in a font must have corresponding caret (text cursor) positions
defined in the GDEF table, otherwhise, users may experience issues with caret
rendering.

If using GlyphsApp, ligature carets can be set directly on canvas by accessing
the `Glyph -> Set Anchors` menu option or by pressing the `Cmd+U` keyboard
shortcut.


  • WARN This font lacks caret position values for ligature glyphs on its GDEF table. [code: lacks-caret-pos]
WARN: Is there kerning info for non-ligated sequences?
--- Rationale ---

Fonts with ligatures should have kerning on the corresponding non-ligated
sequences for text where ligatures aren't used (eg
https://github.com/impallari/Raleway/issues/14).


  • WARN GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:

    • T + h
    • f + f
    • f + b
    • b + f
    • f + h
    • h + f
    • f + i
    • i + f
    • f + j
    • j + f
    • f + k
    • k + f
    • f + l
    • l + f
    • f + t
    • t + b
    • h + i
    • i + j
    • j + k
    • k + l
    • l + t

    [code: lacks-kern-info]

WARN: Check mark characters are in GDEF mark glyph class)
--- Rationale ---

Glyphs in the GDEF mark glyph class should be non-spacing.
Spacing glyphs in the GDEF mark glyph class may have incorrect anchor
positioning that was only intended for building composite glyphs during design.


  • WARN The following spacing glyphs may be in the GDEF mark glyph class by mistake:
    uni0162 [code: spacing-mark-glyphs]
WARN: Check GDEF mark glyph class doesn't have characters that are not marks)
--- Rationale ---

Glyphs in the GDEF mark glyph class become non-spacing and may be repositioned
if they have mark anchors.
Only combining mark glyphs should be in that class. Any non-mark glyph must not
be in that class, in particular spacing glyphs.


  • WARN The following non-mark characters should not be in the GDEF mark glyph class:
    U+0162 [code: non-mark-chars]

[5] Georama[wdth,wght].ttf
WARN: Check copyright namerecords match license file.
--- Rationale ---

A known licensing description must be provided in the NameID 14 (LICENSE
DESCRIPTION) entries of the name table.

The source of truth for this check (to determine which license is in use) is a
file placed side-by-side to your font project including the licensing terms.

Depending on the chosen license, one of the following string snippets is
expected to be found on the NameID 13 (LICENSE DESCRIPTION) entries of the name
table:
- "This Font Software is licensed under the SIL Open Font License, Version 1.1.
This license is available with a FAQ at: https://scripts.sil.org/OFL"
- "Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0"
- "Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0."


Currently accepted licenses are Apache or Open Font License.
For a small set of legacy families the Ubuntu Font License may be acceptable as
well.

When in doubt, please choose OFL for new font projects.


  • WARN Please consider using HTTPS URLs at name table entry [plat=3, enc=1, name=13] [code: http-in-description]
  • WARN For now we're still accepting http URLs, but you should consider using https instead.
    [code: http]
WARN: License URL matches License text on name table?
--- Rationale ---

A known license URL must be provided in the NameID 14 (LICENSE INFO URL) entry
of the name table.

The source of truth for this check is the licensing text found on the NameID 13
entry (LICENSE DESCRIPTION).

The string snippets used for detecting licensing terms are:
- "This Font Software is licensed under the SIL Open Font License, Version 1.1.
This license is available with a FAQ at: https://scripts.sil.org/OFL"
- "Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0"
- "Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0."


Currently accepted licenses are Apache or Open Font License.
For a small set of legacy families the Ubuntu Font License may be acceptable as
well.

When in doubt, please choose OFL for new font projects.


  • WARN Please consider using HTTPS URLs at name table entry [plat=3, enc=1, name=13] [code: http-in-description]
  • WARN Please consider using HTTPS URLs at name table entry [plat=3, enc=1, name=13] [code: http-in-description]
  • WARN Please consider using HTTPS URLs at name table entry [plat=3, enc=1, name=13] [code: http-in-description]
  • WARN Please consider using HTTPS URLs at name table entry [plat=3, enc=1, name=14] [code: http-in-license-info]
  • WARN For now we're still accepting http URLs, but you should consider using https instead.
    [code: http]
WARN: METADATA.pb: Fontfamily is listed on Google Fonts API?
WARN: Are there caret positions declared for every ligature?
--- Rationale ---

All ligatures in a font must have corresponding caret (text cursor) positions
defined in the GDEF table, otherwhise, users may experience issues with caret
rendering.

If using GlyphsApp, ligature carets can be set directly on canvas by accessing
the `Glyph -> Set Anchors` menu option or by pressing the `Cmd+U` keyboard
shortcut.


  • WARN This font lacks caret position values for ligature glyphs on its GDEF table. [code: lacks-caret-pos]
WARN: Is there kerning info for non-ligated sequences?
--- Rationale ---

Fonts with ligatures should have kerning on the corresponding non-ligated
sequences for text where ligatures aren't used (eg
https://github.com/impallari/Raleway/issues/14).


  • WARN GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:

    • T + h
    • f + f
    • f + b
    • b + f
    • f + h
    • h + f
    • f + i
    • i + f
    • f + j
    • j + f
    • f + k
    • k + f
    • f + l
    • l + f
    • f + t
    • t + b
    • h + i
    • i + j
    • j + k
    • k + l
    • l + t

    [code: lacks-kern-info]


Summary

💔 ERROR 🔥 FAIL ⚠ WARN 💤 SKIP ℹ INFO 🍞 PASS 🔎 DEBUG
0 0 13 71 17 239 0
0% 0% 4% 21% 5% 70% 0%

Note: The following loglevels were omitted in this report:

  • SKIP
  • INFO
  • PASS
  • DEBUG

Diff images: georama_qa.zip

@m4rc1e
Copy link
Collaborator

m4rc1e commented Jul 29, 2020

Thanks @yanone. I'll take a look this week.

Fyi, I'd like us to start using the gftools packager for future prs. This will make it much easier to push updates in the future.

@yanone
Copy link
Collaborator Author

yanone commented Jul 29, 2020

When I'm back in October. I'm literally on my third last work day.

@m4rc1e m4rc1e merged commit d8f2f5f into google:master Jul 29, 2020
@RosaWagner RosaWagner added -- Needs Upstream Resolution Upstream fix required before moving forward blocked and removed blocked -- Needs Upstream Resolution Upstream fix required before moving forward labels Oct 13, 2020
@yanone
Copy link
Collaborator Author

yanone commented Oct 23, 2020

@RosaWagner
Why is this blocked? The only hint I can infer from above is the missing packager upstream.yaml ... Is that correct?

@RosaWagner
Copy link
Contributor

I think Marc gave an explanation in the related issue #2650

Copy link

@tarrbrown tarrbrown left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unblock all games

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants