-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 518
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add remote.Reuse for Pusher/Puller #1672
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This package was only used to copy schema 1 images, which we don't need anymore.
This is a big change, but it helps callers out a lot. The Pusher/Puller interfaces allow us to deduplicate a bunch of work (largely, ping an auth), but they only work if you actually use them. It's a huge pain to migrate callers from remote.{Image,Index,...} interfaces to start using Pusher/Puller because the remote functions can be called from anywhere, which means plumbing pushers and pullers around the entire callgraph, which is super painful. Happily, though, most callers already plumb remote.Options around the callgraph so that they can set their options in one place and have them be consistent throughout their application. This change takes advantage of that fact by introducing remote.Reuse, which takes either a Puller or a Pusher, and calls equivalent methods on said pusher/puller whenever you pass remote.Reuse into a remote function. The end result is that we can get almost all of the performance wins of using Puller/Pusher directly with a 3 line change to most applications rather than refactoring everything.
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1672 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 71.89% 72.79% +0.90%
==========================================
Files 120 120
Lines 9833 9599 -234
==========================================
- Hits 7069 6988 -81
+ Misses 2046 1935 -111
+ Partials 718 676 -42
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. |
imjasonh
approved these changes
Apr 25, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is awesome. 🔥
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a big change, but it helps callers out a lot.
The Pusher/Puller interfaces allow us to deduplicate a bunch of work
(largely, ping an auth), but they only work if you actually use them.
It's a huge pain to migrate callers from remote.{Image,Index,...}
interfaces to start using Pusher/Puller because the remote functions can
be called from anywhere, which means plumbing pushers and pullers around
the entire callgraph, which is super painful.
Happily, though, most callers already plumb remote.Options around the
callgraph so that they can set their options in one place and have them
be consistent throughout their application.
This change takes advantage of that fact by introducing remote.Reuse,
which takes either a Puller or a Pusher, and calls equivalent methods on
said pusher/puller whenever you pass remote.Reuse into a remote
function.
The end result is that we can get almost all of the performance wins of
using Puller/Pusher directly with a 3 line change to most applications
rather than refactoring everything.