Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unify default credentials and default project logic to avoid duplicate calls to google.auth.default #2796

Closed
theacodes opened this issue Dec 2, 2016 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
api: core auth priority: p2 Moderately-important priority. Fix may not be included in next release. type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design.

Comments

@theacodes
Copy link
Contributor

Context: https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/google-cloud-python/pull/2726/files#r87670774

@theacodes theacodes self-assigned this Dec 2, 2016
@danoscarmike danoscarmike added priority: p2 Moderately-important priority. Fix may not be included in next release. type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design. api: core labels Feb 28, 2017
@dhermes
Copy link
Contributor

dhermes commented Jul 25, 2017

#3667 and #3668 will go most of the way here

@lukesneeringer
Copy link
Contributor

Hello,
One of the challenges of maintaining a large open source project is that sometimes, you can bite off more than you can chew. As the lead maintainer of google-cloud-python, I can definitely say that I have let the issues here pile up.

As part of trying to get things under control (as well as to empower us to provide better customer service in the future), I am declaring a "bankruptcy" of sorts on many of the old issues, especially those likely to have been addressed or made obsolete by more recent updates.

My goal is to close stale issues whose relevance or solution is no longer immediately evident, and which appear to be of lower importance. I believe in good faith that this is one of those issues, but I am scanning quickly and may occasionally be wrong. If this is an issue of high importance, please comment here and we will reconsider. If this is an issue whose solution is trivial, please consider providing a pull request.

Thank you!

@dhermes
Copy link
Contributor

dhermes commented Aug 11, 2017

@lukesneeringer

  • This should be done
  • This should be easy to do (i.e. ~1 hour)

@theacodes
Copy link
Contributor Author

theacodes commented Aug 11, 2017 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
api: core auth priority: p2 Moderately-important priority. Fix may not be included in next release. type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants