-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OkHttp stream leak when hitting MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS #11053
Comments
hypnoce
added a commit
to hypnoce/grpc-java
that referenced
this issue
Mar 28, 2024
…t transport even if a pending stream was started.
hypnoce
added a commit
to hypnoce/grpc-java
that referenced
this issue
Mar 28, 2024
…t transport even if a pending stream was started.
hypnoce
added a commit
to hypnoce/grpc-java
that referenced
this issue
Mar 28, 2024
…t transport even if a pending stream was started.
ejona86
changed the title
OkHttp stream leak
OkHttp stream leak when hitting MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS
Mar 28, 2024
hypnoce
added a commit
to hypnoce/grpc-java
that referenced
this issue
Mar 29, 2024
…t transport even if a pending stream was started.
ejona86
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 29, 2024
ejona86
pushed a commit
to ejona86/grpc-java
that referenced
this issue
Mar 29, 2024
ejona86
pushed a commit
to ejona86/grpc-java
that referenced
this issue
Mar 29, 2024
This was referenced Mar 29, 2024
ejona86
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 29, 2024
ejona86
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 29, 2024
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
What version of gRPC-Java are you using?
1.60.0
What is your environment?
macOS Monterey, JDK 17
What did you expect to see?
I expect okhttp finished stream to be removed from the inUseState even if pending streams are being started
What did you see instead?
Removal of finished stream is conditional to the start or not of pending streams :
grpc-java/okhttp/src/main/java/io/grpc/okhttp/OkHttpClientTransport.java
Line 956 in 569b426
Steps to reproduce the bug
2333097
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: