-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 46
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update GIR files (2024-01-18) #181
Conversation
GLib-2.0.gir
Outdated
@@ -17356,6 +17380,16 @@ the pointer passed to it should not be `volatile`.</doc> | |||
</parameter> | |||
</parameters> | |||
</function> | |||
<function name="init_enter_pointer" c:identifier="g_once_init_enter_pointer"> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Needs update of gobject-introspection
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also is it expected that the GNOME SDK is already following next GLib? Asking because graphene looks like it was downgraded to a release.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also is it expected that the GNOME SDK is already following next GLib
Yes, it tracks glib from main
Asking because graphene looks like it was downgraded to a release.
We switched from tracking master
to tracking tags for graphene, so it went from 1.10.6-42-g0cfa05ff62f244e4d5e7ac35a1979a23f25c5151
to 1.10.8-0-g4e2578450809c2099400cf85caf18eafcd7100aa
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, so this is all expected and the only thing we need is to get gobject-introspection updated for the GLib introspection data.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Graphene-1.0.gir
Outdated
@@ -3200,23 +3194,6 @@ or graphene_point_init_from_point(), e.g.: | |||
</parameter> | |||
</parameters> | |||
</method> | |||
<method name="distance_squared" c:identifier="graphene_point_distance_squared" version="1.12"> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why is this removed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It was just added in ebassi/graphene@362c9d8 . Did the gir file get downgraded in the GNOME SDK?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Otherwise looks OK
8c7b454
to
6ad2122
Compare
6ad2122
to
f66116d
Compare
f66116d
to
6049278
Compare
6049278
to
0514ad2
Compare
0514ad2
to
860308d
Compare
860308d
to
f4fa075
Compare
Gio-2.0.gir
Outdated
@@ -6930,6 +6943,19 @@ calling g_printerr() in the invoking process.</doc> | |||
</parameter> | |||
</parameters> | |||
</method> | |||
<method name="printerr_literal" c:identifier="g_application_command_line_printerr_literal"> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess for all the GLib things we just wait until GObject-Introspection is properly merged in there and no separate syncing of introspection data is needed.
@alatiera The GNOME SDK is going to build GLib like that then, right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Need to check up on the plan of merging libgi into glib, but otherwise we are gonna be building the girs from glib. Already done, just waiting review https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-build-meta/-/merge_requests/2473
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, so either way just needs a bit of waiting here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Waiting should be over
f4fa075
to
4b27971
Compare
4b27971
to
08844b1
Compare
08844b1
to
f4d3947
Compare
f4d3947
to
604235d
Compare
604235d
to
7f0e30d
Compare
7f0e30d
to
ecfe6b1
Compare
ecfe6b1
to
0374acc
Compare
0374acc
to
0b9e67b
Compare
0b9e67b
to
cc518de
Compare
cc518de
to
71ea66e
Compare
71ea66e
to
4868ae8
Compare
Let us land this and follow up and issues once I open a regeneration PR in both gtk-rs-core/gtk4-rs |
This PR was auto-generated on 2024-01-18. Please review and manually edit before merging.