Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade Guardian services to Panda v7 - support key rotation #160

Open
2 of 7 tasks
rtyley opened this issue Sep 18, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
2 of 7 tasks

Upgrade Guardian services to Panda v7 - support key rotation #160

rtyley opened this issue Sep 18, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@rtyley
Copy link
Member

rtyley commented Sep 18, 2024

Guardian services using Panda

ELK logs for Settings.Refresher

Migration pathway

Best to jump straight to Panda v7, without stopping off on v5/v6 on the way, as the location of the private/public key fields has changed and is eventually removed in favour of the verification/signingAndVerification fields - so avoid multiple changes and jump straight to using those.

Necessary changes to code using Panda

Services using Panda

Content Production

Trello cards:

PRs:

Newsroom Resilience

WebX

MSS

Minimum subset of systems we'd want to have on Panda v7 before performing a rotation

rtyley added a commit to guardian/frontend that referenced this issue Sep 19, 2024
This upgrades Panda from v5 to v7, allowing us to use key rotation as introduced with
guardian/pan-domain-authentication#150.

See also guardian/pan-domain-authentication#160.
rtyley added a commit to guardian/frontend that referenced this issue Sep 19, 2024
This upgrades Panda from v5 to v7, allowing us to use key rotation as introduced with
guardian/pan-domain-authentication#150.

See also guardian/pan-domain-authentication#160.
rtyley added a commit to guardian/frontend that referenced this issue Sep 19, 2024
This upgrades Panda from v5 to v7, allowing us to use key rotation as introduced with
guardian/pan-domain-authentication#150.

See also guardian/pan-domain-authentication#160.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant