Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backport of services: remove assertion on 'task' field being set into release/1.4.x #14865

Conversation

hc-github-team-nomad-core
Copy link
Contributor

Backport

This PR is auto-generated from #14864 to be assessed for backporting due to the inclusion of the label backport/1.4.x.

The below text is copied from the body of the original PR.


This PR removes the assertion around when the 'task' field of
a check may be set. Starting in Nomad 1.4 we automatically set
the task field on all checks in support of the NSD checks feature.

This is causing validation problems elsewhere, e.g. when a group
service using the Consul provider sets 'task' it will fail
validation that worked previously.

The assertion of leaving 'task' unset was only about making sure
job submitters weren't expecting some behavior, but in practice
is causing bugs now that we need the task field for more than it
was originally added for.

We can simply update the docs, noting when the task field set by
job submitters actually has value.

Closes #14822
Closes #14849

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 8, 2023

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 120 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 8, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants