refactor(polars): update the polars backend to use the new relational abstractions #7868
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
cpcloud
added
refactor
kszucs
force-pushed
the
tes-polars
branch
3 times, most recently
from
4b1be6a to
6cb3f66
Compare
cpcloud
force-pushed
the
the-epic-split
branch
from
eb31002 to
61e34b9
Compare
21 tasks
cpcloud
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 5, 2024
… abstractions (#7868) Bare minimum changes required for the polars backend to work with the new relational operations. Since polars' join API follows the same semantics as pandas, I'm using the pandas specific rewrites here. In the future we may want to rewrite the compiler similarly to the pandas one: using `node.map()` and `Dispatched`.
cpcloud
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 12, 2024
… abstractions (#7868) Bare minimum changes required for the polars backend to work with the new relational operations. Since polars' join API follows the same semantics as pandas, I'm using the pandas specific rewrites here. In the future we may want to rewrite the compiler similarly to the pandas one: using `node.map()` and `Dispatched`.
cpcloud
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2024
… abstractions (#7868) Bare minimum changes required for the polars backend to work with the new relational operations. Since polars' join API follows the same semantics as pandas, I'm using the pandas specific rewrites here. In the future we may want to rewrite the compiler similarly to the pandas one: using `node.map()` and `Dispatched`.
cpcloud
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 17, 2024
… abstractions (#7868) Bare minimum changes required for the polars backend to work with the new relational operations. Since polars' join API follows the same semantics as pandas, I'm using the pandas specific rewrites here. In the future we may want to rewrite the compiler similarly to the pandas one: using `node.map()` and `Dispatched`.
kszucs
added a commit
to kszucs/ibis
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 1, 2024
… abstractions (ibis-project#7868) Bare minimum changes required for the polars backend to work with the new relational operations. Since polars' join API follows the same semantics as pandas, I'm using the pandas specific rewrites here. In the future we may want to rewrite the compiler similarly to the pandas one: using `node.map()` and `Dispatched`.
kszucs
added a commit
to kszucs/ibis
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 1, 2024
… abstractions (ibis-project#7868) Bare minimum changes required for the polars backend to work with the new relational operations. Since polars' join API follows the same semantics as pandas, I'm using the pandas specific rewrites here. In the future we may want to rewrite the compiler similarly to the pandas one: using `node.map()` and `Dispatched`.
kszucs
added a commit
to kszucs/ibis
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 1, 2024
… abstractions (ibis-project#7868) Bare minimum changes required for the polars backend to work with the new relational operations. Since polars' join API follows the same semantics as pandas, I'm using the pandas specific rewrites here. In the future we may want to rewrite the compiler similarly to the pandas one: using `node.map()` and `Dispatched`.
kszucs
added a commit
to kszucs/ibis
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 2, 2024
… abstractions (ibis-project#7868) Bare minimum changes required for the polars backend to work with the new relational operations. Since polars' join API follows the same semantics as pandas, I'm using the pandas specific rewrites here. In the future we may want to rewrite the compiler similarly to the pandas one: using `node.map()` and `Dispatched`.
kszucs
added a commit
to kszucs/ibis
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 2, 2024
… abstractions (ibis-project#7868) Bare minimum changes required for the polars backend to work with the new relational operations. Since polars' join API follows the same semantics as pandas, I'm using the pandas specific rewrites here. In the future we may want to rewrite the compiler similarly to the pandas one: using `node.map()` and `Dispatched`.
kszucs
added a commit
to kszucs/ibis
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 2, 2024
… abstractions (ibis-project#7868) Bare minimum changes required for the polars backend to work with the new relational operations. Since polars' join API follows the same semantics as pandas, I'm using the pandas specific rewrites here. In the future we may want to rewrite the compiler similarly to the pandas one: using `node.map()` and `Dispatched`.
cpcloud
pushed a commit
to cpcloud/ibis
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 4, 2024
… abstractions (ibis-project#7868) Bare minimum changes required for the polars backend to work with the new relational operations. Since polars' join API follows the same semantics as pandas, I'm using the pandas specific rewrites here. In the future we may want to rewrite the compiler similarly to the pandas one: using `node.map()` and `Dispatched`.
cpcloud
pushed a commit
to cpcloud/ibis
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2024
… abstractions (ibis-project#7868) Bare minimum changes required for the polars backend to work with the new relational operations. Since polars' join API follows the same semantics as pandas, I'm using the pandas specific rewrites here. In the future we may want to rewrite the compiler similarly to the pandas one: using `node.map()` and `Dispatched`.
kszucs
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2024
… abstractions (#7868) Bare minimum changes required for the polars backend to work with the new relational operations. Since polars' join API follows the same semantics as pandas, I'm using the pandas specific rewrites here. In the future we may want to rewrite the compiler similarly to the pandas one: using `node.map()` and `Dispatched`.
kszucs
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2024
… abstractions (#7868) Bare minimum changes required for the polars backend to work with the new relational operations. Since polars' join API follows the same semantics as pandas, I'm using the pandas specific rewrites here. In the future we may want to rewrite the compiler similarly to the pandas one: using `node.map()` and `Dispatched`.
kszucs
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2024
… abstractions (#7868) Bare minimum changes required for the polars backend to work with the new relational operations. Since polars' join API follows the same semantics as pandas, I'm using the pandas specific rewrites here. In the future we may want to rewrite the compiler similarly to the pandas one: using `node.map()` and `Dispatched`.
cpcloud
pushed a commit
to cpcloud/ibis
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 12, 2024
… abstractions (ibis-project#7868) Bare minimum changes required for the polars backend to work with the new relational operations. Since polars' join API follows the same semantics as pandas, I'm using the pandas specific rewrites here. In the future we may want to rewrite the compiler similarly to the pandas one: using `node.map()` and `Dispatched`.
cpcloud
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 12, 2024
… abstractions (#7868) Bare minimum changes required for the polars backend to work with the new relational operations. Since polars' join API follows the same semantics as pandas, I'm using the pandas specific rewrites here. In the future we may want to rewrite the compiler similarly to the pandas one: using `node.map()` and `Dispatched`.
cpcloud
pushed a commit
to cpcloud/ibis
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 12, 2024
… abstractions (ibis-project#7868) Bare minimum changes required for the polars backend to work with the new relational operations. Since polars' join API follows the same semantics as pandas, I'm using the pandas specific rewrites here. In the future we may want to rewrite the compiler similarly to the pandas one: using `node.map()` and `Dispatched`.
cpcloud
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 12, 2024
… abstractions (#7868) Bare minimum changes required for the polars backend to work with the new relational operations. Since polars' join API follows the same semantics as pandas, I'm using the pandas specific rewrites here. In the future we may want to rewrite the compiler similarly to the pandas one: using `node.map()` and `Dispatched`.
kszucs
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 12, 2024
… abstractions (#7868) Bare minimum changes required for the polars backend to work with the new relational operations. Since polars' join API follows the same semantics as pandas, I'm using the pandas specific rewrites here. In the future we may want to rewrite the compiler similarly to the pandas one: using `node.map()` and `Dispatched`.
ncclementi
pushed a commit
to ncclementi/ibis
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 21, 2024
… abstractions (ibis-project#7868) Bare minimum changes required for the polars backend to work with the new relational operations. Since polars' join API follows the same semantics as pandas, I'm using the pandas specific rewrites here. In the future we may want to rewrite the compiler similarly to the pandas one: using `node.map()` and `Dispatched`.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Bare minimum changes required for the polars backend to work with the new relational operations. Since polars' join API follows the same semantics as pandas, I'm using the pandas specific rewrites here.
In the future we may want to rewrite the compiler similarly to the pandas one: using
node.map()andDispatched.