Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ensure static fields set during signed jar process #383

Conversation

jasonkatonica
Copy link
Contributor

When loading a signed jar file that is on the classpath, such as the bouncy castle signed JCE jar file, it has been observed that the value of restrictedJarVerificationProviders and jarVerificationProviders are set to null. This causes a NullPointerException during the loading process.

This update moves the static declarations of both
restrictedJarVerificationProviders and jarVerificationProviders to be prior to the method call RestrictedSecurity.checkHashValues() since this method call needs both of these fields to be initialized to work correctly.

Signed-off-by: Jason Katonica katonica@us.ibm.com

When loading a signed jar file that is on the classpath, such as the
bouncy castle signed JCE jar file, it has been observed that the value
of `restrictedJarVerificationProviders` and `jarVerificationProviders`
are set to `null`. This causes a NullPointerException during the loading
process.

This update moves the static declarations of both
`restrictedJarVerificationProviders` and `jarVerificationProviders` to
be prior to the method call `RestrictedSecurity.checkHashValues()` since
this method call needs both of these fields to be initialized to work
correctly.

Signed-off-by: Jason Katonica <katonica@us.ibm.com>
@keithc-ca
Copy link
Member

Jenkins line endings check

@keithc-ca keithc-ca merged commit b3b8db9 into ibmruntimes:openj9 Sep 19, 2024
2 checks passed
@jasonkatonica jasonkatonica deleted the katonica/issue524/rsmfailingduetobcsignedjars17 branch September 19, 2024 15:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants