Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dev/validation (starting from rhoadesj/dev validation related changes) #30

Merged
merged 33 commits into from
Mar 10, 2024

Conversation

rhoadesScholar
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@rhoadesScholar rhoadesScholar linked an issue Feb 8, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
@rhoadesScholar
Copy link
Member Author

@davidackerman I think some of these changes were stolen/adapted from your branches?

@davidackerman
Copy link
Collaborator

davidackerman commented Feb 9, 2024

yeah looks like it!

@rhoadesScholar rhoadesScholar changed the title feat: ⚡️ Incorporaten validation related changes from rhoadesj/dev dev/validation (starting from rhoadesj/dev validation related changes) Feb 11, 2024
@rhoadesScholar rhoadesScholar added bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request labels Feb 11, 2024
@rhoadesScholar rhoadesScholar changed the base branch from main to dev/main February 15, 2024 21:51
Additionally: Update project information and dependencies, and add to gitignore.
Also added debugging modes for daisy related tests, and updated daisy version dependency.
Fixed evaluator and validation loops. Replaced hardcoded test_train threshold. Made tweaks for mypy clearance.
Fixed typing declarations to satisfy mypy. Also Black formatted. All tests passing.
Copy link
Member Author

@rhoadesScholar rhoadesScholar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

gtg

Copy link
Member Author

@rhoadesScholar rhoadesScholar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

gtg

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 10, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 59.18367% with 80 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 59.79%. Comparing base (bc75625) to head (0a62016).
Report is 191 commits behind head on dev/main.

Files Patch % Lines
dacapo/experiments/tasks/evaluators/evaluator.py 57.50% 17 Missing ⚠️
...experiments/tasks/evaluators/instance_evaluator.py 30.76% 9 Missing ⚠️
dacapo/validate.py 78.04% 9 Missing ⚠️
dacapo/blockwise/empanada_function.py 0.00% 8 Missing ⚠️
dacapo/blockwise/segment_worker.py 0.00% 8 Missing ⚠️
dacapo/cli.py 0.00% 8 Missing ⚠️
dacapo/store/mongo_config_store.py 50.00% 7 Missing ⚠️
dacapo/blockwise/scheduler.py 50.00% 5 Missing ⚠️
dacapo/store/file_config_store.py 75.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
dacapo/train.py 33.33% 2 Missing ⚠️
... and 4 more
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           dev/main      #30      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     64.30%   59.79%   -4.51%     
============================================
  Files           181      190       +9     
  Lines          5483     6296     +813     
============================================
+ Hits           3526     3765     +239     
- Misses         1957     2531     +574     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member Author

@rhoadesScholar rhoadesScholar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

gtg

@rhoadesScholar rhoadesScholar merged commit ea0564a into dev/main Mar 10, 2024
2 of 4 checks passed
@rhoadesScholar rhoadesScholar deleted the dev/validation branch March 10, 2024 23:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Status: Release
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Impliment Get_overall_best()
2 participants