Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add subsonic server support #419

Closed
wants to merge 23 commits into from
Closed

Add subsonic server support #419

wants to merge 23 commits into from

Conversation

jeffvli
Copy link
Owner

@jeffvli jeffvli commented Dec 19, 2023

No description provided.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 19, 2023

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Updated (UTC)
feishin ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview Dec 19, 2023 11:02pm

@garfieldairlines
Copy link

Hello, just curious: any idea when this feature will be ready?
I kept using gonic until now but it's running Electron 22 that isn't really that supported anymore... I had a few problems with my package manager.

@iiPythonx
Copy link
Contributor

any idea when this feature will be ready?

Taken from jeffvli in discord (2 weeks ago):

Here's my current plan before working on any subsonic support:

  1. Upgrade to Mantine v7
  2. Refactor the main app controller and api adapters for supported servers to better match what Subsonic supports.
  3. Rewrite all the grid/table components. These make up a large part of the app itself and I'm not satisfied with how I initially wrote it which makes it difficult to make changes to anything around it.

With the above changes, the codebase should be able to support Subsonic (as well as other servers potentially).

As far as I know, he's focusing on the Mantine upgrade at the moment.

@garfieldairlines
Copy link

Wait, that vercel preview up above, I just tried it. It's working fine for me, it's what I need.
I want it so bad, I don't care if it's old or experimental, I'm almost begging you to release a version of this one specifically.

@iiPythonx
Copy link
Contributor

iiPythonx commented May 20, 2024

You could build the subsonic branch from source and use that, although you'll be missing quite a lot of newer bug fixes and other changes (I believe the subsonic branch is based on 0.5.2).

@garfieldairlines
Copy link

Well the newer bug fixes and other changes aren't too important for me… I was using a unmaintained player for more than a year, again I'm drooling here in front of this pull request because sonixd isn't maintained anymore, and I kinda got stuck with my package manager (dependency hell because it's outdated as fuck).

@mattiasghodsian
Copy link
Contributor

any ETA when subsonic branch gets some love ?

@kgarner7 kgarner7 linked an issue Sep 14, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
@kgarner7 kgarner7 closed this Sep 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Essential] Subsonic API Support
5 participants