Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump parent pom to 3.54 #99

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 17, 2019
Merged

Conversation

slonopotamus
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

public JenkinsRule j = new JenkinsRule();

@Test
public void hardKill() throws Exception {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What is the problem that this test is reproducing? Did it hang forever with older implementations of WorkflowRun.doKill or something?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@slonopotamus slonopotamus Dec 17, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please, look at jenkinsci/lockable-resources-plugin#170.

They have issues with upgrading to modern JTH, LockStepHardKillTest leaves open file descriptors after test ends and this is detected by jenkinsci/jenkins-test-harness#166.

However, this failure isn't related to lockable-resources-plugin at all, it is local to workflow-support-plugin + workflow-api. That's why I am creating a test here that is a stripped-down version of LockStepHardKillTest demonstrating the same issue.

Note that issue cannot be detected by JMH without upgrading parent POM, that's why I put these changes together.

You may see how this test fails without workflow-api upgrade in build 3 of current PR.

Overall, I'm currently walking through different Jenkins plugins and updating parent pom to 3.54 (you've seen some of my PRs already). Some plugins update cleanly, some encounter different issues related to jenkinsci/jenkins-test-harness#166.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok, so if I understand correctly, the problem is that older versions of workflow-api leave the log file opened in some cases (I guess related to the bugs fixed in versions 2.31, 2.32, and 2.33 of that plugin), which causes test failures on Windows because the temp directories for the tests can't be deleted? I'm just confused why workflow-support has anything to do with it, since you didn't update any code related to SemaphoreStep here, I would think you could see the same problem with waitUntil or maybe even sleep.

You should be able to update the version of workflow-api that lockable-resources depends on (right now it picks up an old version through the workflow-support dependency). From a quick look at the APIs it is using, I think that it would make more sense for lockable-resources to only depend on workflow-step-api and workflow-api in compile scope, and move the workflow-support non-tests-classifier dependency to test scope.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(Adding the test here is fine, thanks for adding it! I just don't think it matters for lockable-resources)

Copy link
Contributor Author

@slonopotamus slonopotamus Dec 17, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the problem is that older versions of workflow-api leave the log file opened in some cases

Right. Newer parent pom brings in newer JTH. Newer JTH is smart enough to detect a bug in older workflow-api versions. This bug can be demonstrated by a (useful, IMO) test that terminates build during semaphore step. lockable-resources have such test. workflow-support-plugin doesn't (until this PR). Fixing it requires updating dependency on workflow-api. And that's what I am doing here.

I do not say that this PR is a prerequisite to fix lockable-resources, they have other options to go.

I would think you could see the same problem with waitUntil or maybe even sleep.

Yes, though semaphore is more deterministic (no hardcoded timeouts and stuff like that).

Copy link
Member

@dwnusbaum dwnusbaum left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! The dependency updates and the core update look fine even though this is a test-only issue, since most of the core Pipeline plugins already require 2.138.4 anyway.

@dwnusbaum dwnusbaum merged commit e3c3be3 into jenkinsci:master Dec 17, 2019
@slonopotamus slonopotamus deleted the parent-pom-3.54 branch December 17, 2019 17:51
@slonopotamus
Copy link
Contributor Author

Note that there are currently issues with ci.jenkins.io, so if master build fails after merging this, just try rerunning it later when infra issues are resolved.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants