Dutch translation #153
Dutch translation #153
Conversation
The current Dutch (Belgium) translations are somewhat bad (grammatically). Please use these (at least for values-nl-rNL).
Fixed small contextual error.
|
@RoySchutte The nl-rBE translation was done by @Ox0000 - I'd like to get some input. I am curious if I should replace nl-rBE with just nl or not, I don't really know the differences between "standard" and Belgian Dutch (this thing is mostly technical, I'd be surprised if there are any important ones). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
CI failed. Untranslatable strings have been translated.
/home/travis/build/julian-klode/dns66/app/src/main/res/values-nl/string.xml:2: Error: Non-translatable resources should only be defined in the base values/ folder [ExtraTranslation]
DNS66
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/home/travis/build/julian-klode/dns66/app/src/main/res/values-nl/string.xml:15: Error: Non-translatable resources should only be defined in the base values/ folder [ExtraTranslation]
© 2016 Julian Andres Klode
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/home/travis/build/julian-klode/dns66/app/src/main/res/values-nl/string.xml:46: Error: Non-translatable resources should only be defined in the base values/ folder [ExtraTranslation]
https://github.com/julian-klode/dns66
|
Hi @julian-klode, I should have explained better. NL-NL (Dutch) and NL-BE (Belgian) are grammatically nearly identical (a few exceptions). We speak the 'same' language. It's more like a different accent, like English and American. The grammatical errors I'm seeing apply to both languages. However, I see that @Ox0000 also used a few words that are uncommon in Dutch, and more common in Belgian. As I am Dutch, I changed those words too. What I tried to say in the original pull comment is:
|
|
Made small changes to make descriptions clearer for users. |
|
The review still stands. If you want this merged, please fix the build failure. |
The current Dutch (Belgium) translations are somewhat bad (grammatically). Please use these (at least for values-nl-rNL).