-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Provide special parser for original Crockford's base32
possibility
#78
Labels
enhancement
New feature or request
Comments
Or adding keyword arguments as an optional parameter? 🤔 |
Just providing new parser is not a hard task. Considering to update or keep exists methods is annoy 🤔
|
Crockford's base32
specsCrockford's base32
possibility
This was referenced May 15, 2021
kachick
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 17, 2021
Resolves #150 This is a simple solution for following issues * #78 * #57 * #143 * ulid/spec#57 * ulid/spec#3
This was referenced Jul 3, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
ref: #57 and ulid/spec#57
My suggestion around the issue is written in oklog/ulid#69 (comment) and https://github.com/ulid/spec/pull/57/files#diff-b335630551682c19a781afebcf4d07bf978fb1f8ac04c6bf87428ed5106870f5R31
But providing the parser for covering the original
Crockford's base32
might be useful for exists difficult ULIDs.How
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: