-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 859
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Align federated helmcharts.source.toolkit.fluxcd.io observedGeneration semantics with its native #5194
Conversation
…n semantics with its native Signed-off-by: yike21 <yike21@qq.com>
cd83e36
to
b92029c
Compare
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #5194 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 28.23% 28.24%
=======================================
Files 632 632
Lines 43712 43712
=======================================
+ Hits 12344 12345 +1
Misses 30465 30465
+ Partials 903 902 -1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
if statusItems[i].status ~= nil and statusItems[i].status.lastHandledReconcileAt ~= nil and statusItems[i].status.lastHandledReconcileAt ~= '' then | ||
desiredObj.status.lastHandledReconcileAt = statusItems[i].status.lastHandledReconcileAt |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
When we add a field that does not exist in status, the program does not report an error, right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, in this case statusItems[i].status.lastHandledReconcileAt
was equal to nil and these two lines would be skipped.
/lgtm |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: XiShanYongYe-Chang The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
part of #4870
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: