Do not include the original insn in zext patchlet #30
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Master branch: 8081ede patch https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20200909233439.3100292-2-iii@linux.ibm.com/ applied successfully |
bpf_patch_insns(). It is still expected to only grow the function or to preserve its size, not to shrink it. Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> --- include/linux/filter.h | 4 ++-- kernel/bpf/core.c | 18 +++++++++--------- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
adjust_insns_aux_data(). The way this function used to be implemented for a single insn is somewhat tricky, and the new version preserves this behavior: 1. For both fast and slow paths, populate zext_dst at [off, off + cnt_old) positions from insns at [off + cnt - cnt_old, off + cnt) positions. On the fast path, this produces identical insn_aux_data and insnsi offsets. On the slow path the offsets are different, but they will be fixed up later. 2. If the prog size did not change, return (fast path). 3. Preserve all the aux data for the leading insns. 4. Preserve all the aux data for the trailing insns, including what has been produced during step 1. This is done by memcpying it to a different offset, which corrects the difference between insn_aux_data and insnsi offsets. 5. Populate seen and zext_dst for the remaining insns. Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
in this case. Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
bpf_patch_insns_data(). There are quite a few uses - adjust them all instead of creating a wrapper, which is not worth it in this case. Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
adjustment, which is incorrect. As discovered by Yauheni in https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200903140542.156624-1-yauheni.kaliuta@redhat.com/ this causes `test_progs -t global_funcs` failures on s390. Most likely, the current code includes the original insn in the patchlet, because there was no infrastructure to insert new insns, only to replace the existing ones. Now that bpf_patch_insns_data() can do insertions, stop including the original insns in zext patchlets. Fixes: a4b1d3c ("bpf: verifier: insert zero extension according to analysis result") Reported-by: Yauheni Kaliuta <yauheni.kaliuta@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 20 +++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
|
Master branch: 2f7de98 patch https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20200909233439.3100292-2-iii@linux.ibm.com/ applied successfully |
kernel-patches-bot
force-pushed
the
series/200679
branch
from
290e005 to
beaded8
Compare
|
At least one diff in series https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/?series=200679 expired. Closing PR. |
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 23, 2021
Fix BPF_CORE_READ_BITFIELD() macro used for reading CO-RE-relocatable bitfields. Missing breaks in a switch caused 8-byte reads always. This can confuse libbpf because it does strict checks that memory load size corresponds to the original size of the field, which in this case quite often would be wrong. After fixing that, we run into another problem, which quite subtle, so worth documenting here. The issue is in Clang optimization and CO-RE relocation interactions. Without that asm volatile construct (also known as barrier_var()), Clang will re-order BYTE_OFFSET and BYTE_SIZE relocations and will apply BYTE_OFFSET 4 times for each switch case arm. This will result in the same error from libbpf about mismatch of memory load size and original field size. I.e., if we were reading u32, we'd still have *(u8 *), *(u16 *), *(u32 *), and *(u64 *) memory loads, three of which will fail. Using barrier_var() forces Clang to apply BYTE_OFFSET relocation first (and once) to calculate p, after which value of p is used without relocation in each of switch case arms, doing appropiately-sized memory load. Here's the list of relevant relocations and pieces of generated BPF code before and after this patch for test_core_reloc_bitfields_direct selftests. BEFORE ===== #45: core_reloc: insn #160 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_sz --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #46: core_reloc: insn #167 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #47: core_reloc: insn #174 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #48: core_reloc: insn #178 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #49: core_reloc: insn #182 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 157: 18 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 ll 159: 7b 12 20 01 00 00 00 00 *(u64 *)(r2 + 288) = r1 160: b7 02 00 00 04 00 00 00 r2 = 4 ; BYTE_SIZE relocation here ^^^ 161: 66 02 07 00 03 00 00 00 if w2 s> 3 goto +7 <LBB0_63> 162: 16 02 0d 00 01 00 00 00 if w2 == 1 goto +13 <LBB0_65> 163: 16 02 01 00 02 00 00 00 if w2 == 2 goto +1 <LBB0_66> 164: 05 00 12 00 00 00 00 00 goto +18 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000528 <LBB0_66>: 165: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 167: 69 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u16 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 168: 05 00 0e 00 00 00 00 00 goto +14 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000548 <LBB0_63>: 169: 16 02 0a 00 04 00 00 00 if w2 == 4 goto +10 <LBB0_67> 170: 16 02 01 00 08 00 00 00 if w2 == 8 goto +1 <LBB0_68> 171: 05 00 0b 00 00 00 00 00 goto +11 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000560 <LBB0_68>: 172: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 174: 79 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 175: 05 00 07 00 00 00 00 00 goto +7 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000580 <LBB0_65>: 176: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 178: 71 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u8 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 179: 05 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 goto +3 <LBB0_69> 00000000000005a0 <LBB0_67>: 180: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 182: 61 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ RIGHT size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 00000000000005b8 <LBB0_69>: 183: 67 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 <<= 32 184: b7 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 185: 16 02 02 00 00 00 00 00 if w2 == 0 goto +2 <LBB0_71> 186: c7 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 s>>= 32 187: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_72> 00000000000005e0 <LBB0_71>: 188: 77 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 >>= 32 AFTER ===== #30: core_reloc: insn #132 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #31: core_reloc: insn #134 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_sz --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 129: 18 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 ll 131: 7b 12 20 01 00 00 00 00 *(u64 *)(r2 + 288) = r1 132: b7 01 00 00 08 00 00 00 r1 = 8 ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here ^^^ ; no size check for non-memory dereferencing instructions 133: 0f 12 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 += r1 134: b7 03 00 00 04 00 00 00 r3 = 4 ; BYTE_SIZE relocation here ^^^ 135: 66 03 05 00 03 00 00 00 if w3 s> 3 goto +5 <LBB0_63> 136: 16 03 09 00 01 00 00 00 if w3 == 1 goto +9 <LBB0_65> 137: 16 03 01 00 02 00 00 00 if w3 == 2 goto +1 <LBB0_66> 138: 05 00 0a 00 00 00 00 00 goto +10 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000458 <LBB0_66>: 139: 69 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u16 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 140: 05 00 08 00 00 00 00 00 goto +8 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000468 <LBB0_63>: 141: 16 03 06 00 04 00 00 00 if w3 == 4 goto +6 <LBB0_67> 142: 16 03 01 00 08 00 00 00 if w3 == 8 goto +1 <LBB0_68> 143: 05 00 05 00 00 00 00 00 goto +5 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000480 <LBB0_68>: 144: 79 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u64 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 145: 05 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 goto +3 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000490 <LBB0_65>: 146: 71 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u8 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 147: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_69> 00000000000004a0 <LBB0_67>: 148: 61 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u32 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 00000000000004a8 <LBB0_69>: 149: 67 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 <<= 32 150: b7 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 151: 16 02 02 00 00 00 00 00 if w2 == 0 goto +2 <LBB0_71> 152: c7 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 s>>= 32 153: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_72> 00000000000004d0 <LBB0_71>: 154: 77 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 >>= 323 Fixes: ee26dad ("libbpf: Add support for relocatable bitfields") Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 24, 2021
Fix BPF_CORE_READ_BITFIELD() macro used for reading CO-RE-relocatable bitfields. Missing breaks in a switch caused 8-byte reads always. This can confuse libbpf because it does strict checks that memory load size corresponds to the original size of the field, which in this case quite often would be wrong. After fixing that, we run into another problem, which quite subtle, so worth documenting here. The issue is in Clang optimization and CO-RE relocation interactions. Without that asm volatile construct (also known as barrier_var()), Clang will re-order BYTE_OFFSET and BYTE_SIZE relocations and will apply BYTE_OFFSET 4 times for each switch case arm. This will result in the same error from libbpf about mismatch of memory load size and original field size. I.e., if we were reading u32, we'd still have *(u8 *), *(u16 *), *(u32 *), and *(u64 *) memory loads, three of which will fail. Using barrier_var() forces Clang to apply BYTE_OFFSET relocation first (and once) to calculate p, after which value of p is used without relocation in each of switch case arms, doing appropiately-sized memory load. Here's the list of relevant relocations and pieces of generated BPF code before and after this patch for test_core_reloc_bitfields_direct selftests. BEFORE ===== #45: core_reloc: insn #160 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_sz --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #46: core_reloc: insn #167 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #47: core_reloc: insn #174 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #48: core_reloc: insn #178 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #49: core_reloc: insn #182 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 157: 18 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 ll 159: 7b 12 20 01 00 00 00 00 *(u64 *)(r2 + 288) = r1 160: b7 02 00 00 04 00 00 00 r2 = 4 ; BYTE_SIZE relocation here ^^^ 161: 66 02 07 00 03 00 00 00 if w2 s> 3 goto +7 <LBB0_63> 162: 16 02 0d 00 01 00 00 00 if w2 == 1 goto +13 <LBB0_65> 163: 16 02 01 00 02 00 00 00 if w2 == 2 goto +1 <LBB0_66> 164: 05 00 12 00 00 00 00 00 goto +18 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000528 <LBB0_66>: 165: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 167: 69 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u16 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 168: 05 00 0e 00 00 00 00 00 goto +14 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000548 <LBB0_63>: 169: 16 02 0a 00 04 00 00 00 if w2 == 4 goto +10 <LBB0_67> 170: 16 02 01 00 08 00 00 00 if w2 == 8 goto +1 <LBB0_68> 171: 05 00 0b 00 00 00 00 00 goto +11 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000560 <LBB0_68>: 172: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 174: 79 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 175: 05 00 07 00 00 00 00 00 goto +7 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000580 <LBB0_65>: 176: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 178: 71 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u8 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 179: 05 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 goto +3 <LBB0_69> 00000000000005a0 <LBB0_67>: 180: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 182: 61 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ RIGHT size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 00000000000005b8 <LBB0_69>: 183: 67 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 <<= 32 184: b7 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 185: 16 02 02 00 00 00 00 00 if w2 == 0 goto +2 <LBB0_71> 186: c7 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 s>>= 32 187: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_72> 00000000000005e0 <LBB0_71>: 188: 77 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 >>= 32 AFTER ===== #30: core_reloc: insn #132 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #31: core_reloc: insn #134 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_sz --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 129: 18 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 ll 131: 7b 12 20 01 00 00 00 00 *(u64 *)(r2 + 288) = r1 132: b7 01 00 00 08 00 00 00 r1 = 8 ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here ^^^ ; no size check for non-memory dereferencing instructions 133: 0f 12 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 += r1 134: b7 03 00 00 04 00 00 00 r3 = 4 ; BYTE_SIZE relocation here ^^^ 135: 66 03 05 00 03 00 00 00 if w3 s> 3 goto +5 <LBB0_63> 136: 16 03 09 00 01 00 00 00 if w3 == 1 goto +9 <LBB0_65> 137: 16 03 01 00 02 00 00 00 if w3 == 2 goto +1 <LBB0_66> 138: 05 00 0a 00 00 00 00 00 goto +10 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000458 <LBB0_66>: 139: 69 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u16 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 140: 05 00 08 00 00 00 00 00 goto +8 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000468 <LBB0_63>: 141: 16 03 06 00 04 00 00 00 if w3 == 4 goto +6 <LBB0_67> 142: 16 03 01 00 08 00 00 00 if w3 == 8 goto +1 <LBB0_68> 143: 05 00 05 00 00 00 00 00 goto +5 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000480 <LBB0_68>: 144: 79 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u64 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 145: 05 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 goto +3 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000490 <LBB0_65>: 146: 71 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u8 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 147: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_69> 00000000000004a0 <LBB0_67>: 148: 61 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u32 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 00000000000004a8 <LBB0_69>: 149: 67 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 <<= 32 150: b7 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 151: 16 02 02 00 00 00 00 00 if w2 == 0 goto +2 <LBB0_71> 152: c7 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 s>>= 32 153: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_72> 00000000000004d0 <LBB0_71>: 154: 77 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 >>= 323 Fixes: ee26dad ("libbpf: Add support for relocatable bitfields") Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 26, 2021
Fix BPF_CORE_READ_BITFIELD() macro used for reading CO-RE-relocatable bitfields. Missing breaks in a switch caused 8-byte reads always. This can confuse libbpf because it does strict checks that memory load size corresponds to the original size of the field, which in this case quite often would be wrong. After fixing that, we run into another problem, which quite subtle, so worth documenting here. The issue is in Clang optimization and CO-RE relocation interactions. Without that asm volatile construct (also known as barrier_var()), Clang will re-order BYTE_OFFSET and BYTE_SIZE relocations and will apply BYTE_OFFSET 4 times for each switch case arm. This will result in the same error from libbpf about mismatch of memory load size and original field size. I.e., if we were reading u32, we'd still have *(u8 *), *(u16 *), *(u32 *), and *(u64 *) memory loads, three of which will fail. Using barrier_var() forces Clang to apply BYTE_OFFSET relocation first (and once) to calculate p, after which value of p is used without relocation in each of switch case arms, doing appropiately-sized memory load. Here's the list of relevant relocations and pieces of generated BPF code before and after this patch for test_core_reloc_bitfields_direct selftests. BEFORE ===== #45: core_reloc: insn #160 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_sz --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #46: core_reloc: insn #167 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #47: core_reloc: insn #174 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #48: core_reloc: insn #178 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #49: core_reloc: insn #182 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 157: 18 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 ll 159: 7b 12 20 01 00 00 00 00 *(u64 *)(r2 + 288) = r1 160: b7 02 00 00 04 00 00 00 r2 = 4 ; BYTE_SIZE relocation here ^^^ 161: 66 02 07 00 03 00 00 00 if w2 s> 3 goto +7 <LBB0_63> 162: 16 02 0d 00 01 00 00 00 if w2 == 1 goto +13 <LBB0_65> 163: 16 02 01 00 02 00 00 00 if w2 == 2 goto +1 <LBB0_66> 164: 05 00 12 00 00 00 00 00 goto +18 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000528 <LBB0_66>: 165: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 167: 69 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u16 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 168: 05 00 0e 00 00 00 00 00 goto +14 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000548 <LBB0_63>: 169: 16 02 0a 00 04 00 00 00 if w2 == 4 goto +10 <LBB0_67> 170: 16 02 01 00 08 00 00 00 if w2 == 8 goto +1 <LBB0_68> 171: 05 00 0b 00 00 00 00 00 goto +11 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000560 <LBB0_68>: 172: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 174: 79 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 175: 05 00 07 00 00 00 00 00 goto +7 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000580 <LBB0_65>: 176: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 178: 71 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u8 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 179: 05 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 goto +3 <LBB0_69> 00000000000005a0 <LBB0_67>: 180: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 182: 61 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ RIGHT size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 00000000000005b8 <LBB0_69>: 183: 67 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 <<= 32 184: b7 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 185: 16 02 02 00 00 00 00 00 if w2 == 0 goto +2 <LBB0_71> 186: c7 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 s>>= 32 187: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_72> 00000000000005e0 <LBB0_71>: 188: 77 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 >>= 32 AFTER ===== #30: core_reloc: insn #132 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #31: core_reloc: insn #134 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_sz --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 129: 18 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 ll 131: 7b 12 20 01 00 00 00 00 *(u64 *)(r2 + 288) = r1 132: b7 01 00 00 08 00 00 00 r1 = 8 ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here ^^^ ; no size check for non-memory dereferencing instructions 133: 0f 12 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 += r1 134: b7 03 00 00 04 00 00 00 r3 = 4 ; BYTE_SIZE relocation here ^^^ 135: 66 03 05 00 03 00 00 00 if w3 s> 3 goto +5 <LBB0_63> 136: 16 03 09 00 01 00 00 00 if w3 == 1 goto +9 <LBB0_65> 137: 16 03 01 00 02 00 00 00 if w3 == 2 goto +1 <LBB0_66> 138: 05 00 0a 00 00 00 00 00 goto +10 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000458 <LBB0_66>: 139: 69 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u16 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 140: 05 00 08 00 00 00 00 00 goto +8 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000468 <LBB0_63>: 141: 16 03 06 00 04 00 00 00 if w3 == 4 goto +6 <LBB0_67> 142: 16 03 01 00 08 00 00 00 if w3 == 8 goto +1 <LBB0_68> 143: 05 00 05 00 00 00 00 00 goto +5 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000480 <LBB0_68>: 144: 79 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u64 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 145: 05 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 goto +3 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000490 <LBB0_65>: 146: 71 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u8 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 147: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_69> 00000000000004a0 <LBB0_67>: 148: 61 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u32 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 00000000000004a8 <LBB0_69>: 149: 67 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 <<= 32 150: b7 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 151: 16 02 02 00 00 00 00 00 if w2 == 0 goto +2 <LBB0_71> 152: c7 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 s>>= 32 153: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_72> 00000000000004d0 <LBB0_71>: 154: 77 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 >>= 323 Fixes: ee26dad ("libbpf: Add support for relocatable bitfields") Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 26, 2021
Fix BPF_CORE_READ_BITFIELD() macro used for reading CO-RE-relocatable bitfields. Missing breaks in a switch caused 8-byte reads always. This can confuse libbpf because it does strict checks that memory load size corresponds to the original size of the field, which in this case quite often would be wrong. After fixing that, we run into another problem, which quite subtle, so worth documenting here. The issue is in Clang optimization and CO-RE relocation interactions. Without that asm volatile construct (also known as barrier_var()), Clang will re-order BYTE_OFFSET and BYTE_SIZE relocations and will apply BYTE_OFFSET 4 times for each switch case arm. This will result in the same error from libbpf about mismatch of memory load size and original field size. I.e., if we were reading u32, we'd still have *(u8 *), *(u16 *), *(u32 *), and *(u64 *) memory loads, three of which will fail. Using barrier_var() forces Clang to apply BYTE_OFFSET relocation first (and once) to calculate p, after which value of p is used without relocation in each of switch case arms, doing appropiately-sized memory load. Here's the list of relevant relocations and pieces of generated BPF code before and after this patch for test_core_reloc_bitfields_direct selftests. BEFORE ===== #45: core_reloc: insn #160 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_sz --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #46: core_reloc: insn #167 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #47: core_reloc: insn #174 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #48: core_reloc: insn #178 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #49: core_reloc: insn #182 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 157: 18 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 ll 159: 7b 12 20 01 00 00 00 00 *(u64 *)(r2 + 288) = r1 160: b7 02 00 00 04 00 00 00 r2 = 4 ; BYTE_SIZE relocation here ^^^ 161: 66 02 07 00 03 00 00 00 if w2 s> 3 goto +7 <LBB0_63> 162: 16 02 0d 00 01 00 00 00 if w2 == 1 goto +13 <LBB0_65> 163: 16 02 01 00 02 00 00 00 if w2 == 2 goto +1 <LBB0_66> 164: 05 00 12 00 00 00 00 00 goto +18 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000528 <LBB0_66>: 165: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 167: 69 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u16 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 168: 05 00 0e 00 00 00 00 00 goto +14 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000548 <LBB0_63>: 169: 16 02 0a 00 04 00 00 00 if w2 == 4 goto +10 <LBB0_67> 170: 16 02 01 00 08 00 00 00 if w2 == 8 goto +1 <LBB0_68> 171: 05 00 0b 00 00 00 00 00 goto +11 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000560 <LBB0_68>: 172: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 174: 79 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 175: 05 00 07 00 00 00 00 00 goto +7 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000580 <LBB0_65>: 176: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 178: 71 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u8 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 179: 05 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 goto +3 <LBB0_69> 00000000000005a0 <LBB0_67>: 180: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 182: 61 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ RIGHT size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 00000000000005b8 <LBB0_69>: 183: 67 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 <<= 32 184: b7 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 185: 16 02 02 00 00 00 00 00 if w2 == 0 goto +2 <LBB0_71> 186: c7 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 s>>= 32 187: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_72> 00000000000005e0 <LBB0_71>: 188: 77 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 >>= 32 AFTER ===== #30: core_reloc: insn #132 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #31: core_reloc: insn #134 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_sz --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 129: 18 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 ll 131: 7b 12 20 01 00 00 00 00 *(u64 *)(r2 + 288) = r1 132: b7 01 00 00 08 00 00 00 r1 = 8 ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here ^^^ ; no size check for non-memory dereferencing instructions 133: 0f 12 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 += r1 134: b7 03 00 00 04 00 00 00 r3 = 4 ; BYTE_SIZE relocation here ^^^ 135: 66 03 05 00 03 00 00 00 if w3 s> 3 goto +5 <LBB0_63> 136: 16 03 09 00 01 00 00 00 if w3 == 1 goto +9 <LBB0_65> 137: 16 03 01 00 02 00 00 00 if w3 == 2 goto +1 <LBB0_66> 138: 05 00 0a 00 00 00 00 00 goto +10 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000458 <LBB0_66>: 139: 69 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u16 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 140: 05 00 08 00 00 00 00 00 goto +8 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000468 <LBB0_63>: 141: 16 03 06 00 04 00 00 00 if w3 == 4 goto +6 <LBB0_67> 142: 16 03 01 00 08 00 00 00 if w3 == 8 goto +1 <LBB0_68> 143: 05 00 05 00 00 00 00 00 goto +5 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000480 <LBB0_68>: 144: 79 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u64 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 145: 05 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 goto +3 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000490 <LBB0_65>: 146: 71 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u8 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 147: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_69> 00000000000004a0 <LBB0_67>: 148: 61 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u32 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 00000000000004a8 <LBB0_69>: 149: 67 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 <<= 32 150: b7 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 151: 16 02 02 00 00 00 00 00 if w2 == 0 goto +2 <LBB0_71> 152: c7 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 s>>= 32 153: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_72> 00000000000004d0 <LBB0_71>: 154: 77 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 >>= 323 Fixes: ee26dad ("libbpf: Add support for relocatable bitfields") Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 26, 2021
Fix BPF_CORE_READ_BITFIELD() macro used for reading CO-RE-relocatable bitfields. Missing breaks in a switch caused 8-byte reads always. This can confuse libbpf because it does strict checks that memory load size corresponds to the original size of the field, which in this case quite often would be wrong. After fixing that, we run into another problem, which quite subtle, so worth documenting here. The issue is in Clang optimization and CO-RE relocation interactions. Without that asm volatile construct (also known as barrier_var()), Clang will re-order BYTE_OFFSET and BYTE_SIZE relocations and will apply BYTE_OFFSET 4 times for each switch case arm. This will result in the same error from libbpf about mismatch of memory load size and original field size. I.e., if we were reading u32, we'd still have *(u8 *), *(u16 *), *(u32 *), and *(u64 *) memory loads, three of which will fail. Using barrier_var() forces Clang to apply BYTE_OFFSET relocation first (and once) to calculate p, after which value of p is used without relocation in each of switch case arms, doing appropiately-sized memory load. Here's the list of relevant relocations and pieces of generated BPF code before and after this patch for test_core_reloc_bitfields_direct selftests. BEFORE ===== #45: core_reloc: insn #160 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_sz --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #46: core_reloc: insn #167 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #47: core_reloc: insn #174 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #48: core_reloc: insn #178 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #49: core_reloc: insn #182 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 157: 18 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 ll 159: 7b 12 20 01 00 00 00 00 *(u64 *)(r2 + 288) = r1 160: b7 02 00 00 04 00 00 00 r2 = 4 ; BYTE_SIZE relocation here ^^^ 161: 66 02 07 00 03 00 00 00 if w2 s> 3 goto +7 <LBB0_63> 162: 16 02 0d 00 01 00 00 00 if w2 == 1 goto +13 <LBB0_65> 163: 16 02 01 00 02 00 00 00 if w2 == 2 goto +1 <LBB0_66> 164: 05 00 12 00 00 00 00 00 goto +18 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000528 <LBB0_66>: 165: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 167: 69 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u16 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 168: 05 00 0e 00 00 00 00 00 goto +14 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000548 <LBB0_63>: 169: 16 02 0a 00 04 00 00 00 if w2 == 4 goto +10 <LBB0_67> 170: 16 02 01 00 08 00 00 00 if w2 == 8 goto +1 <LBB0_68> 171: 05 00 0b 00 00 00 00 00 goto +11 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000560 <LBB0_68>: 172: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 174: 79 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 175: 05 00 07 00 00 00 00 00 goto +7 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000580 <LBB0_65>: 176: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 178: 71 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u8 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 179: 05 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 goto +3 <LBB0_69> 00000000000005a0 <LBB0_67>: 180: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 182: 61 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ RIGHT size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 00000000000005b8 <LBB0_69>: 183: 67 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 <<= 32 184: b7 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 185: 16 02 02 00 00 00 00 00 if w2 == 0 goto +2 <LBB0_71> 186: c7 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 s>>= 32 187: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_72> 00000000000005e0 <LBB0_71>: 188: 77 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 >>= 32 AFTER ===== #30: core_reloc: insn #132 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #31: core_reloc: insn #134 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_sz --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 129: 18 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 ll 131: 7b 12 20 01 00 00 00 00 *(u64 *)(r2 + 288) = r1 132: b7 01 00 00 08 00 00 00 r1 = 8 ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here ^^^ ; no size check for non-memory dereferencing instructions 133: 0f 12 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 += r1 134: b7 03 00 00 04 00 00 00 r3 = 4 ; BYTE_SIZE relocation here ^^^ 135: 66 03 05 00 03 00 00 00 if w3 s> 3 goto +5 <LBB0_63> 136: 16 03 09 00 01 00 00 00 if w3 == 1 goto +9 <LBB0_65> 137: 16 03 01 00 02 00 00 00 if w3 == 2 goto +1 <LBB0_66> 138: 05 00 0a 00 00 00 00 00 goto +10 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000458 <LBB0_66>: 139: 69 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u16 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 140: 05 00 08 00 00 00 00 00 goto +8 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000468 <LBB0_63>: 141: 16 03 06 00 04 00 00 00 if w3 == 4 goto +6 <LBB0_67> 142: 16 03 01 00 08 00 00 00 if w3 == 8 goto +1 <LBB0_68> 143: 05 00 05 00 00 00 00 00 goto +5 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000480 <LBB0_68>: 144: 79 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u64 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 145: 05 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 goto +3 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000490 <LBB0_65>: 146: 71 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u8 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 147: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_69> 00000000000004a0 <LBB0_67>: 148: 61 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u32 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 00000000000004a8 <LBB0_69>: 149: 67 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 <<= 32 150: b7 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 151: 16 02 02 00 00 00 00 00 if w2 == 0 goto +2 <LBB0_71> 152: c7 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 s>>= 32 153: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_72> 00000000000004d0 <LBB0_71>: 154: 77 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 >>= 323 Acked-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com> Fixes: ee26dad ("libbpf: Add support for relocatable bitfields") Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 27, 2021
Fix BPF_CORE_READ_BITFIELD() macro used for reading CO-RE-relocatable bitfields. Missing breaks in a switch caused 8-byte reads always. This can confuse libbpf because it does strict checks that memory load size corresponds to the original size of the field, which in this case quite often would be wrong. After fixing that, we run into another problem, which quite subtle, so worth documenting here. The issue is in Clang optimization and CO-RE relocation interactions. Without that asm volatile construct (also known as barrier_var()), Clang will re-order BYTE_OFFSET and BYTE_SIZE relocations and will apply BYTE_OFFSET 4 times for each switch case arm. This will result in the same error from libbpf about mismatch of memory load size and original field size. I.e., if we were reading u32, we'd still have *(u8 *), *(u16 *), *(u32 *), and *(u64 *) memory loads, three of which will fail. Using barrier_var() forces Clang to apply BYTE_OFFSET relocation first (and once) to calculate p, after which value of p is used without relocation in each of switch case arms, doing appropiately-sized memory load. Here's the list of relevant relocations and pieces of generated BPF code before and after this patch for test_core_reloc_bitfields_direct selftests. BEFORE ===== #45: core_reloc: insn #160 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_sz --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #46: core_reloc: insn #167 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #47: core_reloc: insn #174 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #48: core_reloc: insn #178 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #49: core_reloc: insn #182 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 157: 18 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 ll 159: 7b 12 20 01 00 00 00 00 *(u64 *)(r2 + 288) = r1 160: b7 02 00 00 04 00 00 00 r2 = 4 ; BYTE_SIZE relocation here ^^^ 161: 66 02 07 00 03 00 00 00 if w2 s> 3 goto +7 <LBB0_63> 162: 16 02 0d 00 01 00 00 00 if w2 == 1 goto +13 <LBB0_65> 163: 16 02 01 00 02 00 00 00 if w2 == 2 goto +1 <LBB0_66> 164: 05 00 12 00 00 00 00 00 goto +18 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000528 <LBB0_66>: 165: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 167: 69 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u16 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 168: 05 00 0e 00 00 00 00 00 goto +14 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000548 <LBB0_63>: 169: 16 02 0a 00 04 00 00 00 if w2 == 4 goto +10 <LBB0_67> 170: 16 02 01 00 08 00 00 00 if w2 == 8 goto +1 <LBB0_68> 171: 05 00 0b 00 00 00 00 00 goto +11 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000560 <LBB0_68>: 172: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 174: 79 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 175: 05 00 07 00 00 00 00 00 goto +7 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000580 <LBB0_65>: 176: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 178: 71 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u8 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 179: 05 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 goto +3 <LBB0_69> 00000000000005a0 <LBB0_67>: 180: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 182: 61 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ RIGHT size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 00000000000005b8 <LBB0_69>: 183: 67 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 <<= 32 184: b7 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 185: 16 02 02 00 00 00 00 00 if w2 == 0 goto +2 <LBB0_71> 186: c7 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 s>>= 32 187: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_72> 00000000000005e0 <LBB0_71>: 188: 77 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 >>= 32 AFTER ===== #30: core_reloc: insn #132 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #31: core_reloc: insn #134 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_sz --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 129: 18 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 ll 131: 7b 12 20 01 00 00 00 00 *(u64 *)(r2 + 288) = r1 132: b7 01 00 00 08 00 00 00 r1 = 8 ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here ^^^ ; no size check for non-memory dereferencing instructions 133: 0f 12 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 += r1 134: b7 03 00 00 04 00 00 00 r3 = 4 ; BYTE_SIZE relocation here ^^^ 135: 66 03 05 00 03 00 00 00 if w3 s> 3 goto +5 <LBB0_63> 136: 16 03 09 00 01 00 00 00 if w3 == 1 goto +9 <LBB0_65> 137: 16 03 01 00 02 00 00 00 if w3 == 2 goto +1 <LBB0_66> 138: 05 00 0a 00 00 00 00 00 goto +10 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000458 <LBB0_66>: 139: 69 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u16 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 140: 05 00 08 00 00 00 00 00 goto +8 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000468 <LBB0_63>: 141: 16 03 06 00 04 00 00 00 if w3 == 4 goto +6 <LBB0_67> 142: 16 03 01 00 08 00 00 00 if w3 == 8 goto +1 <LBB0_68> 143: 05 00 05 00 00 00 00 00 goto +5 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000480 <LBB0_68>: 144: 79 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u64 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 145: 05 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 goto +3 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000490 <LBB0_65>: 146: 71 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u8 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 147: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_69> 00000000000004a0 <LBB0_67>: 148: 61 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u32 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 00000000000004a8 <LBB0_69>: 149: 67 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 <<= 32 150: b7 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 151: 16 02 02 00 00 00 00 00 if w2 == 0 goto +2 <LBB0_71> 152: c7 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 s>>= 32 153: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_72> 00000000000004d0 <LBB0_71>: 154: 77 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 >>= 323 Fixes: ee26dad ("libbpf: Add support for relocatable bitfields") Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210426192949.416837-4-andrii@kernel.org
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 28, 2021
To fix possibly the race to access register between the WiFi reset and the other context that is caused by explicitly cancelling ps_work and wake_work to break PM_STATE consistency. Deep sleep would cause the hardware into the inactive state, so we forcely put device drv_own state before we start to reset. The patch also ignore the reset request when the procedure is in progress to avoid the consecutive WiFi resets. localhost ~ # [ 2932.073966] SError Interrupt on CPU7, code 0xbe000011 [ 2932.073967] CPU: 7 PID: 8761 Comm: kworker/u16:2 Not tainted 5.4.112 #30 [ 2932.073968] Hardware name: MediaTek Asurada rev1 board (DT) [ 2932.073968] Workqueue: phy0 ieee80211_reconfig_filter [mac80211] [ 2932.073969] pstate: 80400089 (Nzcv daIf +PAN -UAO) [ 2932.073969] pc : el1_irq+0x78/0x180 [ 2932.073970] lr : mt76_mmio_rmw+0x30/0x5c [mt76] [ 2932.073970] sp : ffffffc01142bad0 [ 2932.073970] x29: ffffffc01142bc00 x28: ffffff8f96fb1e00 [ 2932.073971] x27: ffffffd2cdc12138 x26: ffffffd2cdaeb018 [ 2932.073972] x25: 0000000000000000 x24: ffffff8fa8e14c08 [ 2932.073973] x23: 0000000080c00009 x22: ffffffd2a5603918 [ 2932.073974] x21: ffffffc01142bc10 x20: 0000007fffffffff [ 2932.073975] x19: 0000000000000000 x18: 0000000000000400 [ 2932.073975] x17: 0000000000000400 x16: ffffffd2cd2b87dc [ 2932.073976] x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000000 [ 2932.073977] x13: 0000000000000001 x12: 0000000000000001 [ 2932.073978] x11: 0000000000000001 x10: 000000000010e000 [ 2932.073978] x9 : 0000000000000000 x8 : ffffffc013921404 [ 2932.073979] x7 : 000000b2b5593519 x6 : 0000000000300000 [ 2932.073980] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : ffffffc01142bbc8 [ 2932.073980] x3 : 00000000000001f0 x2 : 0000000000000000 [ 2932.073981] x1 : 0000000000021404 x0 : ffffff8fa8e12300 [ 2932.073982] Kernel panic - not syncing: Asynchronous SError Interrupt [ 2932.073983] CPU: 7 PID: 8761 Comm: kworker/u16:2 Not tainted 5.4.112 #30 [ 2932.073983] Hardware name: MediaTek Asurada rev1 board (DT) [ 2932.073984] Workqueue: phy0 ieee80211_reconfig_filter [mac80211] [ 2932.073984] Call trace: [ 2932.073985] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x14c [ 2932.073985] show_stack+0x20/0x2c [ 2932.073985] dump_stack+0xa0/0xf8 [ 2932.073986] panic+0x154/0x360 [ 2932.073986] test_taint+0x0/0x44 [ 2932.073986] arm64_serror_panic+0x78/0x84 [ 2932.073987] do_serror+0x0/0x118 [ 2932.073987] do_serror+0xa4/0x118 [ 2932.073987] el1_error+0x84/0xf8 [ 2932.073988] el1_irq+0x78/0x180 [ 2932.073988] mt76_mmio_rr+0x30/0xf0 [mt76] [ 2932.073988] mt76_mmio_rmw+0x30/0x5c [mt76] [ 2932.073989] mt7921_rmw+0x4c/0x5c [mt7921e] [ 2932.073989] mt7921_configure_filter+0x138/0x160 [mt7921e] [ 2932.073990] ieee80211_configure_filter+0x2f0/0x3e0 [mac80211] [ 2932.073990] ieee80211_reconfig_filter+0x1c/0x28 [mac80211] [ 2932.073990] process_one_work+0x208/0x3c8 [ 2932.073991] worker_thread+0x23c/0x3e8 [ 2932.073991] kthread+0x140/0x17c [ 2932.073992] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 [ 2932.074071] SMP: stopping secondary CPUs [ 2932.074071] Kernel Offset: 0x12bc800000 from 0xffffffc010000000 [ 2932.074072] PHYS_OFFSET: 0xfffffff180000000 [ 2932.074072] CPU features: 0x080026,2a80aa18 [ 2932.074072] Memory Limit: none Co-developed-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 17, 2021
The perf_buffer fails on system with offline cpus: # test_progs -t perf_buffer test_perf_buffer:PASS:nr_cpus 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:nr_on_cpus 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:attach_kprobe 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:perf_buf__new 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:epoll_fd 0 nsec skipping offline CPU #24 skipping offline CPU #25 skipping offline CPU #26 skipping offline CPU #27 skipping offline CPU #28 skipping offline CPU #29 skipping offline CPU #30 skipping offline CPU #31 test_perf_buffer:PASS:perf_buffer__poll 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:seen_cpu_cnt 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:FAIL:buf_cnt got 24, expected 32 Summary: 0/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED Changing the test to check online cpus instead of possible. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 19, 2021
The perf_buffer fails on system with offline cpus: # test_progs -t perf_buffer test_perf_buffer:PASS:nr_cpus 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:nr_on_cpus 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:attach_kprobe 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:perf_buf__new 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:epoll_fd 0 nsec skipping offline CPU #24 skipping offline CPU #25 skipping offline CPU #26 skipping offline CPU #27 skipping offline CPU #28 skipping offline CPU #29 skipping offline CPU #30 skipping offline CPU #31 test_perf_buffer:PASS:perf_buffer__poll 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:seen_cpu_cnt 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:FAIL:buf_cnt got 24, expected 32 Summary: 0/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED Changing the test to check online cpus instead of possible. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 19, 2021
The perf_buffer fails on system with offline cpus: # test_progs -t perf_buffer test_perf_buffer:PASS:nr_cpus 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:nr_on_cpus 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:attach_kprobe 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:perf_buf__new 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:epoll_fd 0 nsec skipping offline CPU #24 skipping offline CPU #25 skipping offline CPU #26 skipping offline CPU #27 skipping offline CPU #28 skipping offline CPU #29 skipping offline CPU #30 skipping offline CPU #31 test_perf_buffer:PASS:perf_buffer__poll 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:seen_cpu_cnt 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:FAIL:buf_cnt got 24, expected 32 Summary: 0/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED Changing the test to check online cpus instead of possible. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 20, 2021
The perf_buffer fails on system with offline cpus: # test_progs -t perf_buffer test_perf_buffer:PASS:nr_cpus 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:nr_on_cpus 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:attach_kprobe 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:perf_buf__new 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:epoll_fd 0 nsec skipping offline CPU #24 skipping offline CPU #25 skipping offline CPU #26 skipping offline CPU #27 skipping offline CPU #28 skipping offline CPU #29 skipping offline CPU #30 skipping offline CPU #31 test_perf_buffer:PASS:perf_buffer__poll 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:seen_cpu_cnt 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:FAIL:buf_cnt got 24, expected 32 Summary: 0/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED Changing the test to check online cpus instead of possible. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 20, 2021
The perf_buffer fails on system with offline cpus: # test_progs -t perf_buffer test_perf_buffer:PASS:nr_cpus 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:nr_on_cpus 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:attach_kprobe 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:perf_buf__new 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:epoll_fd 0 nsec skipping offline CPU #24 skipping offline CPU #25 skipping offline CPU #26 skipping offline CPU #27 skipping offline CPU #28 skipping offline CPU #29 skipping offline CPU #30 skipping offline CPU #31 test_perf_buffer:PASS:perf_buffer__poll 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:seen_cpu_cnt 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:FAIL:buf_cnt got 24, expected 32 Summary: 0/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED Changing the test to check online cpus instead of possible. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 20, 2021
The perf_buffer fails on system with offline cpus: # test_progs -t perf_buffer test_perf_buffer:PASS:nr_cpus 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:nr_on_cpus 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:attach_kprobe 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:perf_buf__new 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:epoll_fd 0 nsec skipping offline CPU #24 skipping offline CPU #25 skipping offline CPU #26 skipping offline CPU #27 skipping offline CPU #28 skipping offline CPU #29 skipping offline CPU #30 skipping offline CPU #31 test_perf_buffer:PASS:perf_buffer__poll 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:seen_cpu_cnt 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:FAIL:buf_cnt got 24, expected 32 Summary: 0/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED Changing the test to check online cpus instead of possible. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 20, 2021
The perf_buffer fails on system with offline cpus: # test_progs -t perf_buffer test_perf_buffer:PASS:nr_cpus 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:nr_on_cpus 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:attach_kprobe 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:perf_buf__new 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:epoll_fd 0 nsec skipping offline CPU #24 skipping offline CPU #25 skipping offline CPU #26 skipping offline CPU #27 skipping offline CPU #28 skipping offline CPU #29 skipping offline CPU #30 skipping offline CPU #31 test_perf_buffer:PASS:perf_buffer__poll 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:seen_cpu_cnt 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:FAIL:buf_cnt got 24, expected 32 Summary: 0/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED Changing the test to check online cpus instead of possible. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 20, 2021
The perf_buffer fails on system with offline cpus: # test_progs -t perf_buffer test_perf_buffer:PASS:nr_cpus 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:nr_on_cpus 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:attach_kprobe 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:perf_buf__new 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:epoll_fd 0 nsec skipping offline CPU #24 skipping offline CPU #25 skipping offline CPU #26 skipping offline CPU #27 skipping offline CPU #28 skipping offline CPU #29 skipping offline CPU #30 skipping offline CPU #31 test_perf_buffer:PASS:perf_buffer__poll 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:seen_cpu_cnt 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:FAIL:buf_cnt got 24, expected 32 Summary: 0/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED Changing the test to check online cpus instead of possible. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 21, 2021
The perf_buffer fails on system with offline cpus: # test_progs -t perf_buffer test_perf_buffer:PASS:nr_cpus 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:nr_on_cpus 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:attach_kprobe 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:perf_buf__new 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:epoll_fd 0 nsec skipping offline CPU #24 skipping offline CPU #25 skipping offline CPU #26 skipping offline CPU #27 skipping offline CPU #28 skipping offline CPU #29 skipping offline CPU #30 skipping offline CPU #31 test_perf_buffer:PASS:perf_buffer__poll 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:seen_cpu_cnt 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:FAIL:buf_cnt got 24, expected 32 Summary: 0/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED Changing the test to check online cpus instead of possible. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 21, 2021
During boot time kernel configured with OF=y but USE_OF=n displays the following warnings and hangs shortly after starting userspace: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/irq/irqdomain.c:695 irq_create_mapping_affinity+0x29/0xc0 irq_create_mapping_affinity(, 6) called with NULL domain CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3-00001-gd67ed2510d28 #30 Call Trace: __warn+0x69/0xc4 warn_slowpath_fmt+0x6c/0x94 irq_create_mapping_affinity+0x29/0xc0 local_timer_setup+0x40/0x88 time_init+0xb1/0xe8 start_kernel+0x31d/0x3f4 _startup+0x13b/0x13b ---[ end trace 1e6630e1c5eda35b ]--- ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at arch/xtensa/kernel/time.c:141 local_timer_setup+0x58/0x88 error: can't map timer irq CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Tainted: G W 5.15.0-rc3-00001-gd67ed2510d28 #30 Call Trace: __warn+0x69/0xc4 warn_slowpath_fmt+0x6c/0x94 local_timer_setup+0x58/0x88 time_init+0xb1/0xe8 start_kernel+0x31d/0x3f4 _startup+0x13b/0x13b ---[ end trace 1e6630e1c5eda35c ]--- Failed to request irq 0 (timer) Fix that by calling irqchip_init only when CONFIG_USE_OF is selected and calling legacy interrupt controller init otherwise. Fixes: da844a8 ("xtensa: add device trees support") Signed-off-by: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 21, 2021
The perf_buffer fails on system with offline cpus: # test_progs -t perf_buffer test_perf_buffer:PASS:nr_cpus 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:nr_on_cpus 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:attach_kprobe 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:perf_buf__new 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:epoll_fd 0 nsec skipping offline CPU #24 skipping offline CPU #25 skipping offline CPU #26 skipping offline CPU #27 skipping offline CPU #28 skipping offline CPU #29 skipping offline CPU #30 skipping offline CPU #31 test_perf_buffer:PASS:perf_buffer__poll 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:seen_cpu_cnt 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:FAIL:buf_cnt got 24, expected 32 Summary: 0/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED Changing the test to check online cpus instead of possible. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 21, 2021
The perf_buffer fails on system with offline cpus: # test_progs -t perf_buffer test_perf_buffer:PASS:nr_cpus 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:nr_on_cpus 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:attach_kprobe 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:perf_buf__new 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:epoll_fd 0 nsec skipping offline CPU #24 skipping offline CPU #25 skipping offline CPU #26 skipping offline CPU #27 skipping offline CPU #28 skipping offline CPU #29 skipping offline CPU #30 skipping offline CPU #31 test_perf_buffer:PASS:perf_buffer__poll 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:seen_cpu_cnt 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:FAIL:buf_cnt got 24, expected 32 Summary: 0/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED Changing the test to check online cpus instead of possible. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 21, 2021
The perf_buffer fails on system with offline cpus: # test_progs -t perf_buffer test_perf_buffer:PASS:nr_cpus 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:nr_on_cpus 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:attach_kprobe 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:perf_buf__new 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:epoll_fd 0 nsec skipping offline CPU #24 skipping offline CPU #25 skipping offline CPU #26 skipping offline CPU #27 skipping offline CPU #28 skipping offline CPU #29 skipping offline CPU #30 skipping offline CPU #31 test_perf_buffer:PASS:perf_buffer__poll 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:seen_cpu_cnt 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:FAIL:buf_cnt got 24, expected 32 Summary: 0/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED Changing the test to check online cpus instead of possible. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 21, 2021
The perf_buffer fails on system with offline cpus: # test_progs -t perf_buffer test_perf_buffer:PASS:nr_cpus 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:nr_on_cpus 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:attach_kprobe 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:perf_buf__new 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:epoll_fd 0 nsec skipping offline CPU #24 skipping offline CPU #25 skipping offline CPU #26 skipping offline CPU #27 skipping offline CPU #28 skipping offline CPU #29 skipping offline CPU #30 skipping offline CPU #31 test_perf_buffer:PASS:perf_buffer__poll 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:seen_cpu_cnt 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:FAIL:buf_cnt got 24, expected 32 Summary: 0/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED Changing the test to check online cpus instead of possible. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 21, 2021
The perf_buffer fails on system with offline cpus: # test_progs -t perf_buffer test_perf_buffer:PASS:nr_cpus 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:nr_on_cpus 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:attach_kprobe 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:perf_buf__new 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:epoll_fd 0 nsec skipping offline CPU #24 skipping offline CPU #25 skipping offline CPU #26 skipping offline CPU #27 skipping offline CPU #28 skipping offline CPU #29 skipping offline CPU #30 skipping offline CPU #31 test_perf_buffer:PASS:perf_buffer__poll 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:seen_cpu_cnt 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:FAIL:buf_cnt got 24, expected 32 Summary: 0/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED Changing the test to check online cpus instead of possible. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 21, 2021
The perf_buffer fails on system with offline cpus: # test_progs -t perf_buffer test_perf_buffer:PASS:nr_cpus 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:nr_on_cpus 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:attach_kprobe 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:perf_buf__new 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:epoll_fd 0 nsec skipping offline CPU #24 skipping offline CPU #25 skipping offline CPU #26 skipping offline CPU #27 skipping offline CPU #28 skipping offline CPU #29 skipping offline CPU #30 skipping offline CPU #31 test_perf_buffer:PASS:perf_buffer__poll 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:seen_cpu_cnt 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:FAIL:buf_cnt got 24, expected 32 Summary: 0/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED Changing the test to check online cpus instead of possible. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211021114132.8196-2-jolsa@kernel.org
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 9, 2021
To pick the changes in this cset: db8268d ("x86/arch_prctl: Add controls for dynamic XSTATE components") This picks these new prctls: $ tools/perf/trace/beauty/x86_arch_prctl.sh > /tmp/before $ cp arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/prctl.h tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/prctl.h $ tools/perf/trace/beauty/x86_arch_prctl.sh > /tmp/after $ diff -u /tmp/before /tmp/after --- /tmp/before 2021-11-13 10:42:52.787308809 -0300 +++ /tmp/after 2021-11-13 10:43:02.295558837 -0300 @@ -6,6 +6,9 @@ [0x1004 - 0x1001]= "GET_GS", [0x1011 - 0x1001]= "GET_CPUID", [0x1012 - 0x1001]= "SET_CPUID", + [0x1021 - 0x1001]= "GET_XCOMP_SUPP", + [0x1022 - 0x1001]= "GET_XCOMP_PERM", + [0x1023 - 0x1001]= "REQ_XCOMP_PERM", }; #define x86_arch_prctl_codes_2_offset 0x2001 $ With this 'perf trace' can translate those numbers into strings and use the strings in filter expressions: # perf trace -e prctl 0.000 ( 0.011 ms): DOM Worker/3722622 prctl(option: SET_NAME, arg2: 0x7f9c014b7df5) = 0 0.032 ( 0.002 ms): DOM Worker/3722622 prctl(option: SET_NAME, arg2: 0x7f9bb6b51580) = 0 5.452 ( 0.003 ms): StreamT~ns #30/3722623 prctl(option: SET_NAME, arg2: 0x7f9bdbdfeb70) = 0 5.468 ( 0.002 ms): StreamT~ns #30/3722623 prctl(option: SET_NAME, arg2: 0x7f9bdbdfea70) = 0 24.494 ( 0.009 ms): IndexedDB #556/3722624 prctl(option: SET_NAME, arg2: 0x7f562a32ae28) = 0 24.540 ( 0.002 ms): IndexedDB #556/3722624 prctl(option: SET_NAME, arg2: 0x7f563c6d4b30) = 0 670.281 ( 0.008 ms): systemd-userwo/3722339 prctl(option: SET_NAME, arg2: 0x564be30805c8) = 0 670.293 ( 0.002 ms): systemd-userwo/3722339 prctl(option: SET_NAME, arg2: 0x564be30800f0) = 0 ^C# This addresses these perf build warnings: Warning: Kernel ABI header at 'tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/prctl.h' differs from latest version at 'arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/prctl.h' diff -u tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/prctl.h arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/prctl.h Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@intel.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YY%2FER104k852WOTK@kernel.org/T/#u Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 3, 2022
To pick the changes in this cset: 980fe2f ("x86/fpu: Extend fpu_xstate_prctl() with guest permissions") This picks these new prctls: $ tools/perf/trace/beauty/x86_arch_prctl.sh > /tmp/before $ cp arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/prctl.h tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/prctl.h $ tools/perf/trace/beauty/x86_arch_prctl.sh > /tmp/after $ diff -u /tmp/before /tmp/after --- /tmp/before 2022-01-19 14:40:05.049394977 -0300 +++ /tmp/after 2022-01-19 14:40:35.628154565 -0300 @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@ [0x1021 - 0x1001]= "GET_XCOMP_SUPP", [0x1022 - 0x1001]= "GET_XCOMP_PERM", [0x1023 - 0x1001]= "REQ_XCOMP_PERM", + [0x1024 - 0x1001]= "GET_XCOMP_GUEST_PERM", + [0x1025 - 0x1001]= "REQ_XCOMP_GUEST_PERM", }; #define x86_arch_prctl_codes_2_offset 0x2001 $ With this 'perf trace' can translate those numbers into strings and use the strings in filter expressions: # perf trace -e prctl 0.000 ( 0.011 ms): DOM Worker/3722622 prctl(option: SET_NAME, arg2: 0x7f9c014b7df5) = 0 0.032 ( 0.002 ms): DOM Worker/3722622 prctl(option: SET_NAME, arg2: 0x7f9bb6b51580) = 0 5.452 ( 0.003 ms): StreamT~ns #30/3722623 prctl(option: SET_NAME, arg2: 0x7f9bdbdfeb70) = 0 5.468 ( 0.002 ms): StreamT~ns #30/3722623 prctl(option: SET_NAME, arg2: 0x7f9bdbdfea70) = 0 24.494 ( 0.009 ms): IndexedDB #556/3722624 prctl(option: SET_NAME, arg2: 0x7f562a32ae28) = 0 24.540 ( 0.002 ms): IndexedDB #556/3722624 prctl(option: SET_NAME, arg2: 0x7f563c6d4b30) = 0 670.281 ( 0.008 ms): systemd-userwo/3722339 prctl(option: SET_NAME, arg2: 0x564be30805c8) = 0 670.293 ( 0.002 ms): systemd-userwo/3722339 prctl(option: SET_NAME, arg2: 0x564be30800f0) = 0 ^C# This addresses these perf build warnings: Warning: Kernel ABI header at 'tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/prctl.h' differs from latest version at 'arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/prctl.h' diff -u tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/prctl.h arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/prctl.h Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 23, 2023
…vmsg_parser() When the buffer length of the recvmsg system call is 0, we got the flollowing soft lockup problem: watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#3 stuck for 27s! [a.out:6149] CPU: 3 PID: 6149 Comm: a.out Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.2.0+ #30 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:remove_wait_queue+0xb/0xc0 Code: 5e 41 5f c3 cc cc cc cc 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 f3 0f 1e fa 0f 1f 44 00 00 41 57 <41> 56 41 55 41 54 55 48 89 fd 53 48 89 f3 4c 8d 6b 18 4c 8d 73 20 RSP: 0018:ffff88811b5978b8 EFLAGS: 00000246 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88811a7d3780 RCX: ffffffffb7a4d768 RDX: dffffc0000000000 RSI: ffff88811b597908 RDI: ffff888115408040 RBP: 1ffff110236b2f1b R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff88811a7d37e7 R10: ffffed10234fa6fc R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff88811179b800 R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff88811a7d38a8 R15: ffff88811a7d37e0 FS: 00007f6fb5398740(0000) GS:ffff888237180000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000020000000 CR3: 000000010b6ba002 CR4: 0000000000370ee0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> tcp_msg_wait_data+0x279/0x2f0 tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser+0x3c6/0x490 inet_recvmsg+0x280/0x290 sock_recvmsg+0xfc/0x120 ____sys_recvmsg+0x160/0x3d0 ___sys_recvmsg+0xf0/0x180 __sys_recvmsg+0xea/0x1a0 do_syscall_64+0x3f/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc The logic in tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser is as follows: msg_bytes_ready: copied = sk_msg_recvmsg(sk, psock, msg, len, flags); if (!copied) { wait data; goto msg_bytes_ready; } In this case, "copied" alway is 0, the infinite loop occurs. According to the Linux system call man page, 0 should be returned in this case. Therefore, in tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser(), if the length is 0, directly return. Also modify several other functions with the same problem. Fixes: 1f5be6b ("udp: Implement udp_bpf_recvmsg() for sockmap") Fixes: 9825d86 ("af_unix: Implement unix_dgram_bpf_recvmsg()") Fixes: c5d2177 ("bpf, sockmap: Fix race in ingress receive verdict with redirect to self") Fixes: 604326b ("bpf, sockmap: convert to generic sk_msg interface") Signed-off-by: Liu Jian <liujian56@huawei.com>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 28, 2023
…vmsg_parser() When the buffer length of the recvmsg system call is 0, we got the flollowing soft lockup problem: watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#3 stuck for 27s! [a.out:6149] CPU: 3 PID: 6149 Comm: a.out Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.2.0+ #30 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:remove_wait_queue+0xb/0xc0 Code: 5e 41 5f c3 cc cc cc cc 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 f3 0f 1e fa 0f 1f 44 00 00 41 57 <41> 56 41 55 41 54 55 48 89 fd 53 48 89 f3 4c 8d 6b 18 4c 8d 73 20 RSP: 0018:ffff88811b5978b8 EFLAGS: 00000246 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88811a7d3780 RCX: ffffffffb7a4d768 RDX: dffffc0000000000 RSI: ffff88811b597908 RDI: ffff888115408040 RBP: 1ffff110236b2f1b R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff88811a7d37e7 R10: ffffed10234fa6fc R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff88811179b800 R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff88811a7d38a8 R15: ffff88811a7d37e0 FS: 00007f6fb5398740(0000) GS:ffff888237180000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000020000000 CR3: 000000010b6ba002 CR4: 0000000000370ee0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> tcp_msg_wait_data+0x279/0x2f0 tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser+0x3c6/0x490 inet_recvmsg+0x280/0x290 sock_recvmsg+0xfc/0x120 ____sys_recvmsg+0x160/0x3d0 ___sys_recvmsg+0xf0/0x180 __sys_recvmsg+0xea/0x1a0 do_syscall_64+0x3f/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc The logic in tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser is as follows: msg_bytes_ready: copied = sk_msg_recvmsg(sk, psock, msg, len, flags); if (!copied) { wait data; goto msg_bytes_ready; } In this case, "copied" alway is 0, the infinite loop occurs. According to the Linux system call man page, 0 should be returned in this case. Therefore, in tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser(), if the length is 0, directly return. Also modify several other functions with the same problem. Fixes: 1f5be6b ("udp: Implement udp_bpf_recvmsg() for sockmap") Fixes: 9825d86 ("af_unix: Implement unix_dgram_bpf_recvmsg()") Fixes: c5d2177 ("bpf, sockmap: Fix race in ingress receive verdict with redirect to self") Fixes: 604326b ("bpf, sockmap: convert to generic sk_msg interface") Signed-off-by: Liu Jian <liujian56@huawei.com>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 3, 2023
…vmsg_parser() When the buffer length of the recvmsg system call is 0, we got the flollowing soft lockup problem: watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#3 stuck for 27s! [a.out:6149] CPU: 3 PID: 6149 Comm: a.out Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.2.0+ #30 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:remove_wait_queue+0xb/0xc0 Code: 5e 41 5f c3 cc cc cc cc 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 f3 0f 1e fa 0f 1f 44 00 00 41 57 <41> 56 41 55 41 54 55 48 89 fd 53 48 89 f3 4c 8d 6b 18 4c 8d 73 20 RSP: 0018:ffff88811b5978b8 EFLAGS: 00000246 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88811a7d3780 RCX: ffffffffb7a4d768 RDX: dffffc0000000000 RSI: ffff88811b597908 RDI: ffff888115408040 RBP: 1ffff110236b2f1b R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff88811a7d37e7 R10: ffffed10234fa6fc R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff88811179b800 R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff88811a7d38a8 R15: ffff88811a7d37e0 FS: 00007f6fb5398740(0000) GS:ffff888237180000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000020000000 CR3: 000000010b6ba002 CR4: 0000000000370ee0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> tcp_msg_wait_data+0x279/0x2f0 tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser+0x3c6/0x490 inet_recvmsg+0x280/0x290 sock_recvmsg+0xfc/0x120 ____sys_recvmsg+0x160/0x3d0 ___sys_recvmsg+0xf0/0x180 __sys_recvmsg+0xea/0x1a0 do_syscall_64+0x3f/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc The logic in tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser is as follows: msg_bytes_ready: copied = sk_msg_recvmsg(sk, psock, msg, len, flags); if (!copied) { wait data; goto msg_bytes_ready; } In this case, "copied" alway is 0, the infinite loop occurs. According to the Linux system call man page, 0 should be returned in this case. Therefore, in tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser(), if the length is 0, directly return. Also modify several other functions with the same problem. Fixes: 1f5be6b ("udp: Implement udp_bpf_recvmsg() for sockmap") Fixes: 9825d86 ("af_unix: Implement unix_dgram_bpf_recvmsg()") Fixes: c5d2177 ("bpf, sockmap: Fix race in ingress receive verdict with redirect to self") Fixes: 604326b ("bpf, sockmap: convert to generic sk_msg interface") Signed-off-by: Liu Jian <liujian56@huawei.com> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 3, 2023
…vmsg_parser() When the buffer length of the recvmsg system call is 0, we got the flollowing soft lockup problem: watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#3 stuck for 27s! [a.out:6149] CPU: 3 PID: 6149 Comm: a.out Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.2.0+ #30 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:remove_wait_queue+0xb/0xc0 Code: 5e 41 5f c3 cc cc cc cc 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 f3 0f 1e fa 0f 1f 44 00 00 41 57 <41> 56 41 55 41 54 55 48 89 fd 53 48 89 f3 4c 8d 6b 18 4c 8d 73 20 RSP: 0018:ffff88811b5978b8 EFLAGS: 00000246 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88811a7d3780 RCX: ffffffffb7a4d768 RDX: dffffc0000000000 RSI: ffff88811b597908 RDI: ffff888115408040 RBP: 1ffff110236b2f1b R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff88811a7d37e7 R10: ffffed10234fa6fc R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff88811179b800 R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff88811a7d38a8 R15: ffff88811a7d37e0 FS: 00007f6fb5398740(0000) GS:ffff888237180000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000020000000 CR3: 000000010b6ba002 CR4: 0000000000370ee0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> tcp_msg_wait_data+0x279/0x2f0 tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser+0x3c6/0x490 inet_recvmsg+0x280/0x290 sock_recvmsg+0xfc/0x120 ____sys_recvmsg+0x160/0x3d0 ___sys_recvmsg+0xf0/0x180 __sys_recvmsg+0xea/0x1a0 do_syscall_64+0x3f/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc The logic in tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser is as follows: msg_bytes_ready: copied = sk_msg_recvmsg(sk, psock, msg, len, flags); if (!copied) { wait data; goto msg_bytes_ready; } In this case, "copied" always is 0, the infinite loop occurs. According to the Linux system call man page, 0 should be returned in this case. Therefore, in tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser(), if the length is 0, directly return. Also modify several other functions with the same problem. Fixes: 1f5be6b ("udp: Implement udp_bpf_recvmsg() for sockmap") Fixes: 9825d86 ("af_unix: Implement unix_dgram_bpf_recvmsg()") Fixes: c5d2177 ("bpf, sockmap: Fix race in ingress receive verdict with redirect to self") Fixes: 604326b ("bpf, sockmap: convert to generic sk_msg interface") Signed-off-by: Liu Jian <liujian56@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Cc: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230303080946.1146638-1-liujian56@huawei.com
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 30, 2023
To pick the changes in this cset: a03c376 ("x86/arch_prctl: Add AMX feature numbers as ABI constants") 23e5d9e ("x86/mm/iommu/sva: Make LAM and SVA mutually exclusive") 2f8794b ("x86/mm: Provide arch_prctl() interface for LAM") This picks these new prctls in a third range, that was also added to the tools/perf/trace/beauty/arch_prctl.c beautifier. $ tools/perf/trace/beauty/x86_arch_prctl.sh > /tmp/before $ cp arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/prctl.h tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/prctl.h $ tools/perf/trace/beauty/x86_arch_prctl.sh > /tmp/after $ diff -u /tmp/before /tmp/after @@ -20,3 +20,11 @@ [0x2003 - 0x2001]= "MAP_VDSO_64", }; +#define x86_arch_prctl_codes_3_offset 0x4001 +static const char *x86_arch_prctl_codes_3[] = { + [0x4001 - 0x4001]= "GET_UNTAG_MASK", + [0x4002 - 0x4001]= "ENABLE_TAGGED_ADDR", + [0x4003 - 0x4001]= "GET_MAX_TAG_BITS", + [0x4004 - 0x4001]= "FORCE_TAGGED_SVA", +}; + $ With this 'perf trace' can translate those numbers into strings and use the strings in filter expressions: # perf trace -e prctl 0.000 ( 0.011 ms): DOM Worker/3722622 prctl(option: SET_NAME, arg2: 0x7f9c014b7df5) = 0 0.032 ( 0.002 ms): DOM Worker/3722622 prctl(option: SET_NAME, arg2: 0x7f9bb6b51580) = 0 5.452 ( 0.003 ms): StreamT~ns #30/3722623 prctl(option: SET_NAME, arg2: 0x7f9bdbdfeb70) = 0 5.468 ( 0.002 ms): StreamT~ns #30/3722623 prctl(option: SET_NAME, arg2: 0x7f9bdbdfea70) = 0 24.494 ( 0.009 ms): IndexedDB #556/3722624 prctl(option: SET_NAME, arg2: 0x7f562a32ae28) = 0 24.540 ( 0.002 ms): IndexedDB #556/3722624 prctl(option: SET_NAME, arg2: 0x7f563c6d4b30) = 0 670.281 ( 0.008 ms): systemd-userwo/3722339 prctl(option: SET_NAME, arg2: 0x564be30805c8) = 0 670.293 ( 0.002 ms): systemd-userwo/3722339 prctl(option: SET_NAME, arg2: 0x564be30800f0) = 0 ^C# This addresses this perf build warning: Warning: Kernel ABI header at 'tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/prctl.h' differs from latest version at 'arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/prctl.h' diff -u tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/prctl.h arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/prctl.h Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@intel.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZGTjNPpD3FOWfetM@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 8, 2024
The PAPR spec spells the function name as "ibm,reset-pe-dma-windows" but in practice firmware uses the singular form: "ibm,reset-pe-dma-window" in the device tree. Since we have the wrong spelling in the RTAS function table, reverse lookups (token -> name) fail and warn: unexpected failed lookup for token 86 WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 545 at arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c:659 __do_enter_rtas_trace+0x2a4/0x2b4 CPU: 1 PID: 545 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted 6.8.0-rc4 #30 Hardware name: IBM,9105-22A POWER10 (raw) 0x800200 0xf000006 of:IBM,FW1060.00 (NL1060_028) hv:phyp pSeries NIP [c0000000000417f0] __do_enter_rtas_trace+0x2a4/0x2b4 LR [c0000000000417ec] __do_enter_rtas_trace+0x2a0/0x2b4 Call Trace: __do_enter_rtas_trace+0x2a0/0x2b4 (unreliable) rtas_call+0x1f8/0x3e0 enable_ddw.constprop.0+0x4d0/0xc84 dma_iommu_dma_supported+0xe8/0x24c dma_set_mask+0x5c/0xd8 mlx5_pci_init.constprop.0+0xf0/0x46c [mlx5_core] probe_one+0xfc/0x32c [mlx5_core] local_pci_probe+0x68/0x12c pci_call_probe+0x68/0x1ec pci_device_probe+0xbc/0x1a8 really_probe+0x104/0x570 __driver_probe_device+0xb8/0x224 driver_probe_device+0x54/0x130 __driver_attach+0x158/0x2b0 bus_for_each_dev+0xa8/0x120 driver_attach+0x34/0x48 bus_add_driver+0x174/0x304 driver_register+0x8c/0x1c4 __pci_register_driver+0x68/0x7c mlx5_init+0xb8/0x118 [mlx5_core] do_one_initcall+0x60/0x388 do_init_module+0x7c/0x2a4 init_module_from_file+0xb4/0x108 idempotent_init_module+0x184/0x34c sys_finit_module+0x90/0x114 And oopses are possible when lockdep is enabled or the RTAS tracepoints are active, since those paths dereference the result of the lookup. Use the correct spelling to match firmware's behavior, adjusting the related constants to match. Signed-off-by: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com> Fixes: 8252b88 ("powerpc/rtas: improve function information lookups") Reported-by: Gaurav Batra <gbatra@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://msgid.link/20240222-rtas-fix-ibm-reset-pe-dma-window-v1-1-7aaf235ac63c@linux.ibm.com
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
May 9, 2024
Currently, enabling SG_DEBUG in the kernel will cause nouveau to hit a BUG() on startup: kernel BUG at include/linux/scatterlist.h:187! invalid opcode: 0000 [kernel-patches#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 7 PID: 930 Comm: (udev-worker) Not tainted 6.9.0-rc3Lyude-Test+ kernel-patches#30 Hardware name: MSI MS-7A39/A320M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39), BIOS 1.I0 01/22/2019 RIP: 0010:sg_init_one+0x85/0xa0 Code: 69 88 32 01 83 e1 03 f6 c3 03 75 20 a8 01 75 1e 48 09 cb 41 89 54 24 08 49 89 1c 24 41 89 6c 24 0c 5b 5d 41 5c e9 7b b9 88 00 <0f> 0b 0f 0b 0f 0b 48 8b 05 5e 46 9a 01 eb b2 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 RSP: 0018:ffffa776017bf6a0 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffa77600d87000 RCX: 000000000000002b RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffffa77680d87000 RBP: 000000000000e000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: ffff98f4c46aa508 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff98f4c46aa508 R13: ffff98f4c46aa008 R14: ffffa77600d4a000 R15: ffffa77600d4a018 FS: 00007feeb5aae980(0000) GS:ffff98f5c4dc0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f22cb9a4520 CR3: 00000001043ba000 CR4: 00000000003506f0 Call Trace: <TASK> ? die+0x36/0x90 ? do_trap+0xdd/0x100 ? sg_init_one+0x85/0xa0 ? do_error_trap+0x65/0x80 ? sg_init_one+0x85/0xa0 ? exc_invalid_op+0x50/0x70 ? sg_init_one+0x85/0xa0 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 ? sg_init_one+0x85/0xa0 nvkm_firmware_ctor+0x14a/0x250 [nouveau] nvkm_falcon_fw_ctor+0x42/0x70 [nouveau] ga102_gsp_booter_ctor+0xb4/0x1a0 [nouveau] r535_gsp_oneinit+0xb3/0x15f0 [nouveau] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f ? nvkm_udevice_new+0x95/0x140 [nouveau] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f ? ktime_get+0x47/0xb0 ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f nvkm_subdev_oneinit_+0x4f/0x120 [nouveau] nvkm_subdev_init_+0x39/0x140 [nouveau] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f nvkm_subdev_init+0x44/0x90 [nouveau] nvkm_device_init+0x166/0x2e0 [nouveau] nvkm_udevice_init+0x47/0x70 [nouveau] nvkm_object_init+0x41/0x1c0 [nouveau] nvkm_ioctl_new+0x16a/0x290 [nouveau] ? __pfx_nvkm_client_child_new+0x10/0x10 [nouveau] ? __pfx_nvkm_udevice_new+0x10/0x10 [nouveau] nvkm_ioctl+0x126/0x290 [nouveau] nvif_object_ctor+0x112/0x190 [nouveau] nvif_device_ctor+0x23/0x60 [nouveau] nouveau_cli_init+0x164/0x640 [nouveau] nouveau_drm_device_init+0x97/0x9e0 [nouveau] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f ? pci_update_current_state+0x72/0xb0 ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f nouveau_drm_probe+0x12c/0x280 [nouveau] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f local_pci_probe+0x45/0xa0 pci_device_probe+0xc7/0x270 really_probe+0xe6/0x3a0 __driver_probe_device+0x87/0x160 driver_probe_device+0x1f/0xc0 __driver_attach+0xec/0x1f0 ? __pfx___driver_attach+0x10/0x10 bus_for_each_dev+0x88/0xd0 bus_add_driver+0x116/0x220 driver_register+0x59/0x100 ? __pfx_nouveau_drm_init+0x10/0x10 [nouveau] do_one_initcall+0x5b/0x320 do_init_module+0x60/0x250 init_module_from_file+0x86/0xc0 idempotent_init_module+0x120/0x2b0 __x64_sys_finit_module+0x5e/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x83/0x160 ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x71/0x79 RIP: 0033:0x7feeb5cc20cd Code: ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 1b cd 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007ffcf220b2c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000139 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055fdd2916aa0 RCX: 00007feeb5cc20cd RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000055fdd29161e0 RDI: 0000000000000035 RBP: 00007ffcf220b380 R08: 00007feeb5d8fb20 R09: 00007ffcf220b310 R10: 000055fdd2909dc0 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000055fdd29161e0 R13: 0000000000020000 R14: 000055fdd29203e0 R15: 000055fdd2909d80 </TASK> We hit this when trying to initialize firmware of type NVKM_FIRMWARE_IMG_DMA because we allocate our memory with dma_alloc_coherent, and DMA allocations can't be turned back into memory pages - which a scatterlist needs in order to map them. So, fix this by allocating the memory with vmalloc instead(). V2: * Fixup explanation as the prior one was bogus Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240429182318.189668-1-lyude@redhat.com
kuba-moo
pushed a commit
to linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 29, 2024
Currently, enabling SG_DEBUG in the kernel will cause nouveau to hit a BUG() on startup, when the iommu is enabled: kernel BUG at include/linux/scatterlist.h:187! invalid opcode: 0000 [kernel-patches#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 7 PID: 930 Comm: (udev-worker) Not tainted 6.9.0-rc3Lyude-Test+ kernel-patches#30 Hardware name: MSI MS-7A39/A320M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39), BIOS 1.I0 01/22/2019 RIP: 0010:sg_init_one+0x85/0xa0 Code: 69 88 32 01 83 e1 03 f6 c3 03 75 20 a8 01 75 1e 48 09 cb 41 89 54 24 08 49 89 1c 24 41 89 6c 24 0c 5b 5d 41 5c e9 7b b9 88 00 <0f> 0b 0f 0b 0f 0b 48 8b 05 5e 46 9a 01 eb b2 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 RSP: 0018:ffffa776017bf6a0 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffa77600d87000 RCX: 000000000000002b RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffffa77680d87000 RBP: 000000000000e000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: ffff98f4c46aa508 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff98f4c46aa508 R13: ffff98f4c46aa008 R14: ffffa77600d4a000 R15: ffffa77600d4a018 FS: 00007feeb5aae980(0000) GS:ffff98f5c4dc0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f22cb9a4520 CR3: 00000001043ba000 CR4: 00000000003506f0 Call Trace: <TASK> ? die+0x36/0x90 ? do_trap+0xdd/0x100 ? sg_init_one+0x85/0xa0 ? do_error_trap+0x65/0x80 ? sg_init_one+0x85/0xa0 ? exc_invalid_op+0x50/0x70 ? sg_init_one+0x85/0xa0 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 ? sg_init_one+0x85/0xa0 nvkm_firmware_ctor+0x14a/0x250 [nouveau] nvkm_falcon_fw_ctor+0x42/0x70 [nouveau] ga102_gsp_booter_ctor+0xb4/0x1a0 [nouveau] r535_gsp_oneinit+0xb3/0x15f0 [nouveau] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f ? nvkm_udevice_new+0x95/0x140 [nouveau] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f ? ktime_get+0x47/0xb0 Fix this by using the non-coherent allocator instead, I think there might be a better answer to this, but it involve ripping up some of APIs using sg lists. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 2541626 ("drm/nouveau/acr: use common falcon HS FW code for ACR FWs") Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240815201923.632803-1-airlied@gmail.com
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 3, 2025
Initialize the struct da7213_priv::ctrl_lock mutex. Without it the following stack trace is displayed when rebooting and lockdep is enabled: DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lock->magic != lock) WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 180 at kernel/locking/mutex.c:564 __mutex_lock+0x254/0x4e4 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 180 Comm: alsactl Not tainted 6.13.0-next-20250123-arm64-renesas-00002-g132083a22d3d #30 Hardware name: Renesas SMARC EVK version 2 based on r9a08g045s33 (DT) pstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : __mutex_lock+0x254/0x4e4 lr : __mutex_lock+0x254/0x4e4 sp : ffff800082c13c00 x29: ffff800082c13c00 x28: ffff00001002b500 x27: 0000000000000000 x26: 0000000000000000 x25: ffff800080b30db4 x24: 0000000000000002 x23: ffff800082c13c70 x22: 0000ffffc2a68a70 x21: ffff000010348000 x20: 0000000000000000 x19: ffff00000be2e488 x18: 0000000000000000 x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 00000000000003c1 x13: 00000000000003c1 x12: 0000000000000000 x11: 0000000000000011 x10: 0000000000001420 x9 : ffff800082c13a70 x8 : 0000000000000001 x7 : ffff800082c13a50 x6 : ffff800082c139e0 x5 : ffff800082c14000 x4 : ffff800082c13a50 x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : ffff00001002b500 Call trace: __mutex_lock+0x254/0x4e4 (P) mutex_lock_nested+0x20/0x28 da7213_volsw_locked_get+0x34/0x60 snd_ctl_elem_read+0xbc/0x114 snd_ctl_ioctl+0x878/0xa70 __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x94/0xc8 invoke_syscall+0x44/0x104 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xb4/0xd4 do_el0_svc+0x18/0x20 el0_svc+0x3c/0xf0 el0t_64_sync_handler+0xc0/0xc4 el0t_64_sync+0x154/0x158 irq event stamp: 7713 hardirqs last enabled at (7713): [<ffff800080170d94>] ktime_get_coarse_real_ts64+0xf0/0x10c hardirqs last disabled at (7712): [<ffff800080170d58>] ktime_get_coarse_real_ts64+0xb4/0x10c softirqs last enabled at (7550): [<ffff8000800179d4>] fpsimd_restore_current_state+0x30/0xb8 softirqs last disabled at (7548): [<ffff8000800179a8>] fpsimd_restore_current_state+0x4/0xb8 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Fixes: 64c3259 ("ASoC: da7213: Add new kcontrol for tonegen") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250123121036.70406-1-claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pull request for series with
subject: Do not include the original insn in zext patchlet
version: 1
url: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/?series=200679