bpf: selftests: remove shared header from sockmap iter test #48

kernel-patches-bot · 2020-09-11T15:41:13Z

Pull request for series with
subject: bpf: selftests: remove shared header from sockmap iter test
version: 1
url: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/?series=201096

kernel-patches-bot · 2020-09-11T15:41:14Z

Master branch: 2bab48c
series: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/?series=201096
version: 1

patch https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20200911091411.37645-1-lmb@cloudflare.com/ applied successfully

kernel-patches-bot · 2020-09-11T20:18:02Z

Master branch: 2bab48c
series: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/?series=201096
version: 1

patch https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20200911091411.37645-1-lmb@cloudflare.com/ applied successfully

kernel-patches-bot · 2020-09-15T01:32:59Z

Master branch: d72714c
series: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/?series=201096
version: 1

patch https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20200911091411.37645-1-lmb@cloudflare.com/ applied successfully

kernel-patches-bot · 2020-09-15T01:49:00Z

Master branch: bf74a37
series: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/?series=201096
version: 1

patch https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20200911091411.37645-1-lmb@cloudflare.com/ applied successfully

Dynamically allocate the sock_fd array based on bpf_map__max_entries instead. Suggested-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com> --- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c | 39 ++++++++++--------- .../selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_sockmap.c | 5 +-- .../selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_sockmap.h | 3 -- 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_sockmap.h

kernel-patches-bot · 2020-09-15T02:03:49Z

Master branch: d317b0a
series: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/?series=201096
version: 1

patch https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20200911091411.37645-1-lmb@cloudflare.com/ applied successfully

kernel-patches-bot · 2020-09-15T15:12:11Z

At least one diff in series https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/?series=201096 expired. Closing PR.

Fix BPF_CORE_READ_BITFIELD() macro used for reading CO-RE-relocatable bitfields. Missing breaks in a switch caused 8-byte reads always. This can confuse libbpf because it does strict checks that memory load size corresponds to the original size of the field, which in this case quite often would be wrong. After fixing that, we run into another problem, which quite subtle, so worth documenting here. The issue is in Clang optimization and CO-RE relocation interactions. Without that asm volatile construct (also known as barrier_var()), Clang will re-order BYTE_OFFSET and BYTE_SIZE relocations and will apply BYTE_OFFSET 4 times for each switch case arm. This will result in the same error from libbpf about mismatch of memory load size and original field size. I.e., if we were reading u32, we'd still have *(u8 *), *(u16 *), *(u32 *), and *(u64 *) memory loads, three of which will fail. Using barrier_var() forces Clang to apply BYTE_OFFSET relocation first (and once) to calculate p, after which value of p is used without relocation in each of switch case arms, doing appropiately-sized memory load. Here's the list of relevant relocations and pieces of generated BPF code before and after this patch for test_core_reloc_bitfields_direct selftests. BEFORE ===== #45: core_reloc: insn #160 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_sz --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #46: core_reloc: insn #167 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #47: core_reloc: insn #174 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #48: core_reloc: insn #178 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #49: core_reloc: insn #182 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 157: 18 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 ll 159: 7b 12 20 01 00 00 00 00 *(u64 *)(r2 + 288) = r1 160: b7 02 00 00 04 00 00 00 r2 = 4 ; BYTE_SIZE relocation here ^^^ 161: 66 02 07 00 03 00 00 00 if w2 s> 3 goto +7 <LBB0_63> 162: 16 02 0d 00 01 00 00 00 if w2 == 1 goto +13 <LBB0_65> 163: 16 02 01 00 02 00 00 00 if w2 == 2 goto +1 <LBB0_66> 164: 05 00 12 00 00 00 00 00 goto +18 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000528 <LBB0_66>: 165: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 167: 69 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u16 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 168: 05 00 0e 00 00 00 00 00 goto +14 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000548 <LBB0_63>: 169: 16 02 0a 00 04 00 00 00 if w2 == 4 goto +10 <LBB0_67> 170: 16 02 01 00 08 00 00 00 if w2 == 8 goto +1 <LBB0_68> 171: 05 00 0b 00 00 00 00 00 goto +11 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000560 <LBB0_68>: 172: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 174: 79 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 175: 05 00 07 00 00 00 00 00 goto +7 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000580 <LBB0_65>: 176: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 178: 71 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u8 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 179: 05 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 goto +3 <LBB0_69> 00000000000005a0 <LBB0_67>: 180: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 182: 61 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ RIGHT size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 00000000000005b8 <LBB0_69>: 183: 67 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 <<= 32 184: b7 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 185: 16 02 02 00 00 00 00 00 if w2 == 0 goto +2 <LBB0_71> 186: c7 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 s>>= 32 187: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_72> 00000000000005e0 <LBB0_71>: 188: 77 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 >>= 32 AFTER ===== #30: core_reloc: insn #132 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #31: core_reloc: insn #134 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_sz --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 129: 18 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 ll 131: 7b 12 20 01 00 00 00 00 *(u64 *)(r2 + 288) = r1 132: b7 01 00 00 08 00 00 00 r1 = 8 ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here ^^^ ; no size check for non-memory dereferencing instructions 133: 0f 12 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 += r1 134: b7 03 00 00 04 00 00 00 r3 = 4 ; BYTE_SIZE relocation here ^^^ 135: 66 03 05 00 03 00 00 00 if w3 s> 3 goto +5 <LBB0_63> 136: 16 03 09 00 01 00 00 00 if w3 == 1 goto +9 <LBB0_65> 137: 16 03 01 00 02 00 00 00 if w3 == 2 goto +1 <LBB0_66> 138: 05 00 0a 00 00 00 00 00 goto +10 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000458 <LBB0_66>: 139: 69 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u16 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 140: 05 00 08 00 00 00 00 00 goto +8 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000468 <LBB0_63>: 141: 16 03 06 00 04 00 00 00 if w3 == 4 goto +6 <LBB0_67> 142: 16 03 01 00 08 00 00 00 if w3 == 8 goto +1 <LBB0_68> 143: 05 00 05 00 00 00 00 00 goto +5 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000480 <LBB0_68>: 144: 79 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u64 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 145: 05 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 goto +3 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000490 <LBB0_65>: 146: 71 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u8 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 147: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_69> 00000000000004a0 <LBB0_67>: 148: 61 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u32 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 00000000000004a8 <LBB0_69>: 149: 67 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 <<= 32 150: b7 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 151: 16 02 02 00 00 00 00 00 if w2 == 0 goto +2 <LBB0_71> 152: c7 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 s>>= 32 153: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_72> 00000000000004d0 <LBB0_71>: 154: 77 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 >>= 323 Fixes: ee26dad ("libbpf: Add support for relocatable bitfields") Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>

Fix BPF_CORE_READ_BITFIELD() macro used for reading CO-RE-relocatable bitfields. Missing breaks in a switch caused 8-byte reads always. This can confuse libbpf because it does strict checks that memory load size corresponds to the original size of the field, which in this case quite often would be wrong. After fixing that, we run into another problem, which quite subtle, so worth documenting here. The issue is in Clang optimization and CO-RE relocation interactions. Without that asm volatile construct (also known as barrier_var()), Clang will re-order BYTE_OFFSET and BYTE_SIZE relocations and will apply BYTE_OFFSET 4 times for each switch case arm. This will result in the same error from libbpf about mismatch of memory load size and original field size. I.e., if we were reading u32, we'd still have *(u8 *), *(u16 *), *(u32 *), and *(u64 *) memory loads, three of which will fail. Using barrier_var() forces Clang to apply BYTE_OFFSET relocation first (and once) to calculate p, after which value of p is used without relocation in each of switch case arms, doing appropiately-sized memory load. Here's the list of relevant relocations and pieces of generated BPF code before and after this patch for test_core_reloc_bitfields_direct selftests. BEFORE ===== #45: core_reloc: insn #160 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_sz --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #46: core_reloc: insn #167 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #47: core_reloc: insn #174 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #48: core_reloc: insn #178 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #49: core_reloc: insn #182 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 157: 18 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 ll 159: 7b 12 20 01 00 00 00 00 *(u64 *)(r2 + 288) = r1 160: b7 02 00 00 04 00 00 00 r2 = 4 ; BYTE_SIZE relocation here ^^^ 161: 66 02 07 00 03 00 00 00 if w2 s> 3 goto +7 <LBB0_63> 162: 16 02 0d 00 01 00 00 00 if w2 == 1 goto +13 <LBB0_65> 163: 16 02 01 00 02 00 00 00 if w2 == 2 goto +1 <LBB0_66> 164: 05 00 12 00 00 00 00 00 goto +18 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000528 <LBB0_66>: 165: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 167: 69 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u16 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 168: 05 00 0e 00 00 00 00 00 goto +14 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000548 <LBB0_63>: 169: 16 02 0a 00 04 00 00 00 if w2 == 4 goto +10 <LBB0_67> 170: 16 02 01 00 08 00 00 00 if w2 == 8 goto +1 <LBB0_68> 171: 05 00 0b 00 00 00 00 00 goto +11 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000560 <LBB0_68>: 172: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 174: 79 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 175: 05 00 07 00 00 00 00 00 goto +7 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000580 <LBB0_65>: 176: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 178: 71 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u8 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 179: 05 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 goto +3 <LBB0_69> 00000000000005a0 <LBB0_67>: 180: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 182: 61 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ RIGHT size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 00000000000005b8 <LBB0_69>: 183: 67 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 <<= 32 184: b7 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 185: 16 02 02 00 00 00 00 00 if w2 == 0 goto +2 <LBB0_71> 186: c7 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 s>>= 32 187: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_72> 00000000000005e0 <LBB0_71>: 188: 77 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 >>= 32 AFTER ===== #30: core_reloc: insn #132 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #31: core_reloc: insn #134 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_sz --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 129: 18 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 ll 131: 7b 12 20 01 00 00 00 00 *(u64 *)(r2 + 288) = r1 132: b7 01 00 00 08 00 00 00 r1 = 8 ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here ^^^ ; no size check for non-memory dereferencing instructions 133: 0f 12 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 += r1 134: b7 03 00 00 04 00 00 00 r3 = 4 ; BYTE_SIZE relocation here ^^^ 135: 66 03 05 00 03 00 00 00 if w3 s> 3 goto +5 <LBB0_63> 136: 16 03 09 00 01 00 00 00 if w3 == 1 goto +9 <LBB0_65> 137: 16 03 01 00 02 00 00 00 if w3 == 2 goto +1 <LBB0_66> 138: 05 00 0a 00 00 00 00 00 goto +10 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000458 <LBB0_66>: 139: 69 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u16 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 140: 05 00 08 00 00 00 00 00 goto +8 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000468 <LBB0_63>: 141: 16 03 06 00 04 00 00 00 if w3 == 4 goto +6 <LBB0_67> 142: 16 03 01 00 08 00 00 00 if w3 == 8 goto +1 <LBB0_68> 143: 05 00 05 00 00 00 00 00 goto +5 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000480 <LBB0_68>: 144: 79 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u64 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 145: 05 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 goto +3 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000490 <LBB0_65>: 146: 71 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u8 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 147: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_69> 00000000000004a0 <LBB0_67>: 148: 61 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u32 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 00000000000004a8 <LBB0_69>: 149: 67 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 <<= 32 150: b7 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 151: 16 02 02 00 00 00 00 00 if w2 == 0 goto +2 <LBB0_71> 152: c7 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 s>>= 32 153: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_72> 00000000000004d0 <LBB0_71>: 154: 77 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 >>= 323 Acked-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com> Fixes: ee26dad ("libbpf: Add support for relocatable bitfields") Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>

Fix BPF_CORE_READ_BITFIELD() macro used for reading CO-RE-relocatable bitfields. Missing breaks in a switch caused 8-byte reads always. This can confuse libbpf because it does strict checks that memory load size corresponds to the original size of the field, which in this case quite often would be wrong. After fixing that, we run into another problem, which quite subtle, so worth documenting here. The issue is in Clang optimization and CO-RE relocation interactions. Without that asm volatile construct (also known as barrier_var()), Clang will re-order BYTE_OFFSET and BYTE_SIZE relocations and will apply BYTE_OFFSET 4 times for each switch case arm. This will result in the same error from libbpf about mismatch of memory load size and original field size. I.e., if we were reading u32, we'd still have *(u8 *), *(u16 *), *(u32 *), and *(u64 *) memory loads, three of which will fail. Using barrier_var() forces Clang to apply BYTE_OFFSET relocation first (and once) to calculate p, after which value of p is used without relocation in each of switch case arms, doing appropiately-sized memory load. Here's the list of relevant relocations and pieces of generated BPF code before and after this patch for test_core_reloc_bitfields_direct selftests. BEFORE ===== #45: core_reloc: insn #160 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_sz --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #46: core_reloc: insn #167 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #47: core_reloc: insn #174 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #48: core_reloc: insn #178 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #49: core_reloc: insn #182 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 157: 18 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 ll 159: 7b 12 20 01 00 00 00 00 *(u64 *)(r2 + 288) = r1 160: b7 02 00 00 04 00 00 00 r2 = 4 ; BYTE_SIZE relocation here ^^^ 161: 66 02 07 00 03 00 00 00 if w2 s> 3 goto +7 <LBB0_63> 162: 16 02 0d 00 01 00 00 00 if w2 == 1 goto +13 <LBB0_65> 163: 16 02 01 00 02 00 00 00 if w2 == 2 goto +1 <LBB0_66> 164: 05 00 12 00 00 00 00 00 goto +18 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000528 <LBB0_66>: 165: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 167: 69 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u16 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 168: 05 00 0e 00 00 00 00 00 goto +14 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000548 <LBB0_63>: 169: 16 02 0a 00 04 00 00 00 if w2 == 4 goto +10 <LBB0_67> 170: 16 02 01 00 08 00 00 00 if w2 == 8 goto +1 <LBB0_68> 171: 05 00 0b 00 00 00 00 00 goto +11 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000560 <LBB0_68>: 172: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 174: 79 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 175: 05 00 07 00 00 00 00 00 goto +7 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000580 <LBB0_65>: 176: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 178: 71 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u8 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 179: 05 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 goto +3 <LBB0_69> 00000000000005a0 <LBB0_67>: 180: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 182: 61 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ RIGHT size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 00000000000005b8 <LBB0_69>: 183: 67 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 <<= 32 184: b7 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 185: 16 02 02 00 00 00 00 00 if w2 == 0 goto +2 <LBB0_71> 186: c7 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 s>>= 32 187: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_72> 00000000000005e0 <LBB0_71>: 188: 77 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 >>= 32 AFTER ===== #30: core_reloc: insn #132 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 #31: core_reloc: insn #134 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_sz --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 129: 18 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 ll 131: 7b 12 20 01 00 00 00 00 *(u64 *)(r2 + 288) = r1 132: b7 01 00 00 08 00 00 00 r1 = 8 ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here ^^^ ; no size check for non-memory dereferencing instructions 133: 0f 12 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 += r1 134: b7 03 00 00 04 00 00 00 r3 = 4 ; BYTE_SIZE relocation here ^^^ 135: 66 03 05 00 03 00 00 00 if w3 s> 3 goto +5 <LBB0_63> 136: 16 03 09 00 01 00 00 00 if w3 == 1 goto +9 <LBB0_65> 137: 16 03 01 00 02 00 00 00 if w3 == 2 goto +1 <LBB0_66> 138: 05 00 0a 00 00 00 00 00 goto +10 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000458 <LBB0_66>: 139: 69 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u16 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 140: 05 00 08 00 00 00 00 00 goto +8 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000468 <LBB0_63>: 141: 16 03 06 00 04 00 00 00 if w3 == 4 goto +6 <LBB0_67> 142: 16 03 01 00 08 00 00 00 if w3 == 8 goto +1 <LBB0_68> 143: 05 00 05 00 00 00 00 00 goto +5 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000480 <LBB0_68>: 144: 79 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u64 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 145: 05 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 goto +3 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000490 <LBB0_65>: 146: 71 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u8 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 147: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_69> 00000000000004a0 <LBB0_67>: 148: 61 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u32 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 00000000000004a8 <LBB0_69>: 149: 67 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 <<= 32 150: b7 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 151: 16 02 02 00 00 00 00 00 if w2 == 0 goto +2 <LBB0_71> 152: c7 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 s>>= 32 153: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_72> 00000000000004d0 <LBB0_71>: 154: 77 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 >>= 323 Fixes: ee26dad ("libbpf: Add support for relocatable bitfields") Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210426192949.416837-4-andrii@kernel.org

nft_set_elem_expr_alloc() needs an initialized set if expression sets on the NFT_EXPR_GC flag. Move set fields initialization before expression setup. [4512935.019450] ================================================================== [4512935.019456] BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in nft_set_elem_expr_alloc+0x84/0xd0 [nf_tables] [4512935.019487] Read of size 8 at addr 0000000000000070 by task nft/23532 [4512935.019494] CPU: 1 PID: 23532 Comm: nft Not tainted 5.12.0-rc4+ #48 [...] [4512935.019502] Call Trace: [4512935.019505] dump_stack+0x89/0xb4 [4512935.019512] ? nft_set_elem_expr_alloc+0x84/0xd0 [nf_tables] [4512935.019536] ? nft_set_elem_expr_alloc+0x84/0xd0 [nf_tables] [4512935.019560] kasan_report.cold.12+0x5f/0xd8 [4512935.019566] ? nft_set_elem_expr_alloc+0x84/0xd0 [nf_tables] [4512935.019590] nft_set_elem_expr_alloc+0x84/0xd0 [nf_tables] [4512935.019615] nf_tables_newset+0xc7f/0x1460 [nf_tables] Reported-by: syzbot+ce96ca2b1d0b37c6422d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 6503842 ("netfilter: nf_tables: allow to specify stateful expression in set definition") Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>

This patch adds '--timing' to test_progs. It tracks and print timing information for each tests, it also prints top 10 slowest tests in the summary. Example output: $./test_progs --timing -j #1 align:OK (16 ms) ... #203 xdp_bonding:OK (2019 ms) #206 xdp_cpumap_attach:OK (3 ms) #207 xdp_devmap_attach:OK (4 ms) #208 xdp_info:OK (4 ms) #209 xdp_link:OK (4 ms) Top 10 Slowest tests: #48 fexit_stress: 34356 ms #160 test_lsm: 29602 ms #161 test_overhead: 29190 ms #159 test_local_storage: 28959 ms #158 test_ima: 28521 ms #185 verif_scale_pyperf600: 19524 ms #199 vmlinux: 17310 ms #154 tc_redirect: 11491 ms (serial) #147 task_local_storage: 7612 ms #183 verif_scale_pyperf180: 7186 ms Summary: 212/973 PASSED, 3 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Yucong Sun <sunyucong@gmail.com>

The BPF STX/LDX instruction uses offset relative to the FP to address stack space. Since the BPF_FP locates at the top of the frame, the offset is usually a negative number. However, arm64 str/ldr immediate instruction requires that offset be a positive number. Therefore, this patch tries to convert the offsets. The method is to find the negative offset furthest from the FP firstly. Then add it to the FP, calculate a bottom position, called FPB, and then adjust the offsets in other STR/LDX instructions relative to FPB. FPB is saved using the callee-saved register x27 of arm64 which is not used yet. Before adjusting the offset, the patch checks every instruction to ensure that the FP does not change in run-time. If the FP may change, no offset is adjusted. For example, for the following bpftrace command: bpftrace -e 'kprobe:do_sys_open { printf("opening: %s\n", str(arg1)); }' Without this patch, jited code(fragment): 0: bti c 4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! 8: mov x29, sp c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]! 10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]! 14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]! 18: mov x25, sp 1c: mov x26, #0x0 // #0 20: bti j 24: sub sp, sp, #0x90 28: add x19, x0, #0x0 2c: mov x0, #0x0 // #0 30: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff78 // #-136 34: str x0, [x25, x10] 38: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff80 // #-128 3c: str x0, [x25, x10] 40: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff88 // #-120 44: str x0, [x25, x10] 48: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff90 // #-112 4c: str x0, [x25, x10] 50: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff98 // #-104 54: str x0, [x25, x10] 58: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa0 // #-96 5c: str x0, [x25, x10] 60: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa8 // #-88 64: str x0, [x25, x10] 68: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb0 // #-80 6c: str x0, [x25, x10] 70: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb8 // #-72 74: str x0, [x25, x10] 78: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc0 // #-64 7c: str x0, [x25, x10] 80: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc8 // #-56 84: str x0, [x25, x10] 88: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd0 // #-48 8c: str x0, [x25, x10] 90: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd8 // #-40 94: str x0, [x25, x10] 98: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe0 // #-32 9c: str x0, [x25, x10] a0: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe8 // #-24 a4: str x0, [x25, x10] a8: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff0 // #-16 ac: str x0, [x25, x10] b0: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff8 // #-8 b4: str x0, [x25, x10] b8: mov x10, #0x8 // #8 bc: ldr x2, [x19, x10] [...] With this patch, jited code(fragment): 0: bti c 4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! 8: mov x29, sp c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]! 10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]! 14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]! 18: stp x27, x28, [sp, #-16]! 1c: mov x25, sp 20: sub x27, x25, #0x88 24: mov x26, #0x0 // #0 28: bti j 2c: sub sp, sp, #0x90 30: add x19, x0, #0x0 34: mov x0, #0x0 // #0 38: str x0, [x27] 3c: str x0, [x27, #8] 40: str x0, [x27, #16] 44: str x0, [x27, #24] 48: str x0, [x27, #32] 4c: str x0, [x27, #40] 50: str x0, [x27, #48] 54: str x0, [x27, #56] 58: str x0, [x27, #64] 5c: str x0, [x27, #72] 60: str x0, [x27, #80] 64: str x0, [x27, #88] 68: str x0, [x27, #96] 6c: str x0, [x27, #104] 70: str x0, [x27, #112] 74: str x0, [x27, #120] 78: str x0, [x27, #128] 7c: ldr x2, [x19, #8] [...] Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>

The BPF STX/LDX instruction uses offset relative to the FP to address stack space. Since the BPF_FP locates at the top of the frame, the offset is usually a negative number. However, arm64 str/ldr immediate instruction requires that offset be a positive number. Therefore, this patch tries to convert the offsets. The method is to find the negative offset furthest from the FP firstly. Then add it to the FP, calculate a bottom position, called FPB, and then adjust the offsets in other STR/LDX instructions relative to FPB. FPB is saved using the callee-saved register x27 of arm64 which is not used yet. Before adjusting the offset, the patch checks every instruction to ensure that the FP does not change in run-time. If the FP may change, no offset is adjusted. For example, for the following bpftrace command: bpftrace -e 'kprobe:do_sys_open { printf("opening: %s\n", str(arg1)); }' Without this patch, jited code(fragment): 0: bti c 4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! 8: mov x29, sp c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]! 10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]! 14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]! 18: mov x25, sp 1c: mov x26, #0x0 // #0 20: bti j 24: sub sp, sp, #0x90 28: add x19, x0, #0x0 2c: mov x0, #0x0 // #0 30: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff78 // #-136 34: str x0, [x25, x10] 38: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff80 // #-128 3c: str x0, [x25, x10] 40: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff88 // #-120 44: str x0, [x25, x10] 48: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff90 // #-112 4c: str x0, [x25, x10] 50: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff98 // #-104 54: str x0, [x25, x10] 58: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa0 // #-96 5c: str x0, [x25, x10] 60: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa8 // #-88 64: str x0, [x25, x10] 68: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb0 // #-80 6c: str x0, [x25, x10] 70: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb8 // #-72 74: str x0, [x25, x10] 78: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc0 // #-64 7c: str x0, [x25, x10] 80: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc8 // #-56 84: str x0, [x25, x10] 88: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd0 // #-48 8c: str x0, [x25, x10] 90: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd8 // #-40 94: str x0, [x25, x10] 98: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe0 // #-32 9c: str x0, [x25, x10] a0: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe8 // #-24 a4: str x0, [x25, x10] a8: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff0 // #-16 ac: str x0, [x25, x10] b0: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff8 // #-8 b4: str x0, [x25, x10] b8: mov x10, #0x8 // #8 bc: ldr x2, [x19, x10] [...] With this patch, jited code(fragment): 0: bti c 4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! 8: mov x29, sp c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]! 10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]! 14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]! 18: stp x27, x28, [sp, #-16]! 1c: mov x25, sp 20: sub x27, x25, #0x88 24: mov x26, #0x0 // #0 28: bti j 2c: sub sp, sp, #0x90 30: add x19, x0, #0x0 34: mov x0, #0x0 // #0 38: str x0, [x27] 3c: str x0, [x27, #8] 40: str x0, [x27, #16] 44: str x0, [x27, #24] 48: str x0, [x27, #32] 4c: str x0, [x27, #40] 50: str x0, [x27, #48] 54: str x0, [x27, #56] 58: str x0, [x27, #64] 5c: str x0, [x27, #72] 60: str x0, [x27, #80] 64: str x0, [x27, #88] 68: str x0, [x27, #96] 6c: str x0, [x27, #104] 70: str x0, [x27, #112] 74: str x0, [x27, #120] 78: str x0, [x27, #128] 7c: ldr x2, [x19, #8] [...] Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220321152852.2334294-4-xukuohai@huawei.com

There is a false lockdep warning (inconsistent lock state), if enable lockdep. This is not a real deadlock issue. When the lock is taken in non-NMI contexts, and then in NMI, there is a warning as show below. For performance, this patch doesn't use trylock, and disable lockdep only temporarily. [ 82.474075] ================================ [ 82.474076] WARNING: inconsistent lock state [ 82.474090] 6.1.0+ #48 Tainted: G E [ 82.474093] -------------------------------- [ 82.474100] inconsistent {INITIAL USE} -> {IN-NMI} usage. [ 82.474101] kprobe-load/1740 [HC1[1]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] takes: [ 82.474105] ffff88860a5cf7b0 (&htab->lockdep_key){....}-{2:2}, at: htab_lock_bucket+0x61/0x6c [ 82.474120] {INITIAL USE} state was registered at: [ 82.474122] mark_usage+0x1d/0x11d [ 82.474130] __lock_acquire+0x3c9/0x6ed [ 82.474131] lock_acquire+0x23d/0x29a [ 82.474135] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x43/0x7f [ 82.474148] htab_lock_bucket+0x61/0x6c [ 82.474151] htab_map_update_elem+0x11e/0x220 [ 82.474155] bpf_map_update_value+0x267/0x28e [ 82.474160] map_update_elem+0x13e/0x17d [ 82.474164] __sys_bpf+0x2ae/0xb2e [ 82.474167] __do_sys_bpf+0xd/0x15 [ 82.474171] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x84 [ 82.474174] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd [ 82.474178] irq event stamp: 1496498 [ 82.474180] hardirqs last enabled at (1496497): [<ffffffff817eb9d9>] syscall_enter_from_user_mode+0x63/0x8d [ 82.474184] hardirqs last disabled at (1496498): [<ffffffff817ea6b6>] exc_nmi+0x87/0x109 [ 82.474187] softirqs last enabled at (1446698): [<ffffffff81a00347>] __do_softirq+0x347/0x387 [ 82.474191] softirqs last disabled at (1446693): [<ffffffff810b9b06>] __irq_exit_rcu+0x67/0xc6 [ 82.474195] [ 82.474195] other info that might help us debug this: [ 82.474196] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 82.474196] [ 82.474197] CPU0 [ 82.474198] ---- [ 82.474198] lock(&htab->lockdep_key); [ 82.474200] <Interrupt> [ 82.474200] lock(&htab->lockdep_key); [ 82.474201] [ 82.474201] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 82.474201] [ 82.474202] no locks held by kprobe-load/1740. [ 82.474203] [ 82.474203] stack backtrace: [ 82.474205] CPU: 14 PID: 1740 Comm: kprobe-load Tainted: G E 6.1.0+ #48 [ 82.474208] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba5276e321-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 82.474213] Call Trace: [ 82.474218] <NMI> [ 82.474224] dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x81 [ 82.474228] lock_acquire+0x1f4/0x29a [ 82.474233] ? htab_lock_bucket+0x61/0x6c [ 82.474237] ? rcu_read_lock_held_common+0xe/0x38 [ 82.474245] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x43/0x7f [ 82.474249] ? htab_lock_bucket+0x61/0x6c [ 82.474253] htab_lock_bucket+0x61/0x6c [ 82.474257] htab_map_update_elem+0x11e/0x220 [ 82.474264] bpf_prog_df326439468c24a9_bpf_prog1+0x41/0x45 [ 82.474276] bpf_trampoline_6442457183_0+0x43/0x1000 [ 82.474283] nmi_handle+0x5/0x254 [ 82.474289] default_do_nmi+0x3d/0xf6 [ 82.474293] exc_nmi+0xa1/0x109 [ 82.474297] end_repeat_nmi+0x16/0x67 [ 82.474300] RIP: 0010:cpu_online+0xa/0x12 [ 82.474308] Code: 08 00 00 00 39 c6 0f 43 c6 83 c0 07 83 e0 f8 c3 cc cc cc cc 0f 1f 44 00 00 31 c0 c3 cc cc cc cc 89 ff 48 0f a3 3d 5f 52 75 01 <0f> 92 c0 c3 cc cc cc cc 55 48 89 e5 41 57 49 89 f7 41 56 49 896 [ 82.474310] RSP: 0018:ffffc9000131bd38 EFLAGS: 00000283 [ 82.474313] RAX: ffff88860b85fe78 RBX: 0000000000102cc0 RCX: 0000000000000008 [ 82.474315] RDX: 0000000000000004 RSI: ffff88860b85fe78 RDI: 000000000000000e [ 82.474316] RBP: 00000000ffffffff R08: 0000000000102cc0 R09: 00000000ffffffff [ 82.474318] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff888100042200 [ 82.474320] R13: 0000000000000004 R14: ffffffff81271dc2 R15: ffff88860b85fe78 [ 82.474322] ? kvmalloc_node+0x44/0xd2 [ 82.474333] ? cpu_online+0xa/0x12 [ 82.474338] ? cpu_online+0xa/0x12 [ 82.474342] </NMI> [ 82.474343] <TASK> [ 82.474343] trace_kmalloc+0x7c/0xe6 [ 82.474347] ? kvmalloc_node+0x44/0xd2 [ 82.474350] __kmalloc_node+0x9a/0xaf [ 82.474354] kvmalloc_node+0x44/0xd2 [ 82.474359] kvmemdup_bpfptr+0x29/0x66 [ 82.474363] map_update_elem+0x119/0x17d [ 82.474370] __sys_bpf+0x2ae/0xb2e [ 82.474380] __do_sys_bpf+0xd/0x15 [ 82.474384] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x84 [ 82.474387] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd [ 82.474391] RIP: 0033:0x7fe75d4f752d [ 82.474394] Code: 00 c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 2b 79 2c 00 f7 d8 64 89 018 [ 82.474396] RSP: 002b:00007ffe95d1cd78 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000141 [ 82.474398] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007fe75d4f752d [ 82.474400] RDX: 0000000000000078 RSI: 00007ffe95d1cd80 RDI: 0000000000000002 [ 82.474401] RBP: 00007ffe95d1ce30 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000004 [ 82.474403] R10: 00007ffe95d1cd80 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000004007f0 [ 82.474405] R13: 00007ffe95d1cf10 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 82.474412] </TASK> Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <tong@infragraf.org> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev> Cc: Song Liu <song@kernel.org> Cc: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Cc: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org> Cc: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Cc: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>

Occasionally, with './test_progs -j' on my vm, I will hit the following failure: test_cgrp_local_storage:PASS:join_cgroup /cgrp_local_storage 0 nsec test_cgroup_iter_sleepable:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec test_cgroup_iter_sleepable:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec test_cgroup_iter_sleepable:PASS:attach_iter 0 nsec test_cgroup_iter_sleepable:PASS:iter_create 0 nsec test_cgroup_iter_sleepable:FAIL:cgroup_id unexpected cgroup_id: actual 1 != expected 2812 #48/5 cgrp_local_storage/cgroup_iter_sleepable:FAIL #48 cgrp_local_storage:FAIL Finally, I decided to do some investigation since the test is introduced by myself. It turns out the reason is due to cgroup_fd with value 0. In cgroup_iter, a cgroup_fd of value 0 means the root cgroup. /* from cgroup_iter.c */ if (fd) cgrp = cgroup_v1v2_get_from_fd(fd); else if (id) cgrp = cgroup_get_from_id(id); else /* walk the entire hierarchy by default. */ cgrp = cgroup_get_from_path("/"); That is why we got cgroup_id 1 instead of expected 2812. Why we got a cgroup_fd 0? Nobody should really touch 'stdin' (fd 0) in test_progs. I traced 'close' syscall with stack trace and found the root cause, which is a bug in bpf_obj_pinning.c. Basically, the code closed fd 0 although it should not. Fixing the bug in bpf_obj_pinning.c also resolved the above cgroup_iter_sleepable subtest failure. Fixes: 3b22f98 ("selftests/bpf: Add path_fd-based BPF_OBJ_PIN and BPF_OBJ_GET tests") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>

Occasionally, with './test_progs -j' on my vm, I will hit the following failure: test_cgrp_local_storage:PASS:join_cgroup /cgrp_local_storage 0 nsec test_cgroup_iter_sleepable:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec test_cgroup_iter_sleepable:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec test_cgroup_iter_sleepable:PASS:attach_iter 0 nsec test_cgroup_iter_sleepable:PASS:iter_create 0 nsec test_cgroup_iter_sleepable:FAIL:cgroup_id unexpected cgroup_id: actual 1 != expected 2812 #48/5 cgrp_local_storage/cgroup_iter_sleepable:FAIL #48 cgrp_local_storage:FAIL Finally, I decided to do some investigation since the test is introduced by myself. It turns out the reason is due to cgroup_fd with value 0. In cgroup_iter, a cgroup_fd of value 0 means the root cgroup. /* from cgroup_iter.c */ if (fd) cgrp = cgroup_v1v2_get_from_fd(fd); else if (id) cgrp = cgroup_get_from_id(id); else /* walk the entire hierarchy by default. */ cgrp = cgroup_get_from_path("/"); That is why we got cgroup_id 1 instead of expected 2812. Why we got a cgroup_fd 0? Nobody should really touch 'stdin' (fd 0) in test_progs. I traced 'close' syscall with stack trace and found the root cause, which is a bug in bpf_obj_pinning.c. Basically, the code closed fd 0 although it should not. Fixing the bug in bpf_obj_pinning.c also resolved the above cgroup_iter_sleepable subtest failure. Fixes: 3b22f98 ("selftests/bpf: Add path_fd-based BPF_OBJ_PIN and BPF_OBJ_GET tests") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230827150551.1743497-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev

Expanding the test coverage from cgroup2 to include cgroup1. The result as follows, Already existing test cases for cgroup2: #48/1 cgrp_local_storage/tp_btf:OK #48/2 cgrp_local_storage/attach_cgroup:OK #48/3 cgrp_local_storage/recursion:OK #48/4 cgrp_local_storage/negative:OK #48/5 cgrp_local_storage/cgroup_iter_sleepable:OK #48/6 cgrp_local_storage/yes_rcu_lock:OK #48/7 cgrp_local_storage/no_rcu_lock:OK Expanded test cases for cgroup1: #48/8 cgrp_local_storage/cgrp1_tp_btf:OK #48/9 cgrp_local_storage/cgrp1_recursion:OK #48/10 cgrp_local_storage/cgrp1_negative:OK #48/11 cgrp_local_storage/cgrp1_iter_sleepable:OK #48/12 cgrp_local_storage/cgrp1_yes_rcu_lock:OK #48/13 cgrp_local_storage/cgrp1_no_rcu_lock:OK Summary: #48 cgrp_local_storage:OK Summary: 1/13 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>

Expanding the test coverage from cgroup2 to include cgroup1. The result as follows, Already existing test cases for cgroup2: #48/1 cgrp_local_storage/tp_btf:OK #48/2 cgrp_local_storage/attach_cgroup:OK #48/3 cgrp_local_storage/recursion:OK #48/4 cgrp_local_storage/negative:OK #48/5 cgrp_local_storage/cgroup_iter_sleepable:OK #48/6 cgrp_local_storage/yes_rcu_lock:OK #48/7 cgrp_local_storage/no_rcu_lock:OK Expanded test cases for cgroup1: #48/8 cgrp_local_storage/cgrp1_tp_btf:OK #48/9 cgrp_local_storage/cgrp1_recursion:OK #48/10 cgrp_local_storage/cgrp1_negative:OK #48/11 cgrp_local_storage/cgrp1_iter_sleepable:OK #48/12 cgrp_local_storage/cgrp1_yes_rcu_lock:OK #48/13 cgrp_local_storage/cgrp1_no_rcu_lock:OK Summary: #48 cgrp_local_storage:OK Summary: 1/13 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>

Expanding the test coverage from cgroup2 to include cgroup1. The result as follows, Already existing test cases for cgroup2: #48/1 cgrp_local_storage/tp_btf:OK #48/2 cgrp_local_storage/attach_cgroup:OK #48/3 cgrp_local_storage/recursion:OK #48/4 cgrp_local_storage/negative:OK #48/5 cgrp_local_storage/cgroup_iter_sleepable:OK #48/6 cgrp_local_storage/yes_rcu_lock:OK #48/7 cgrp_local_storage/no_rcu_lock:OK Expanded test cases for cgroup1: #48/8 cgrp_local_storage/cgrp1_tp_btf:OK #48/9 cgrp_local_storage/cgrp1_recursion:OK #48/10 cgrp_local_storage/cgrp1_negative:OK #48/11 cgrp_local_storage/cgrp1_iter_sleepable:OK #48/12 cgrp_local_storage/cgrp1_yes_rcu_lock:OK #48/13 cgrp_local_storage/cgrp1_no_rcu_lock:OK Summary: #48 cgrp_local_storage:OK Summary: 1/13 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231206115326.4295-4-laoar.shao@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>

The `cgrp_local_storage` test triggers a kernel panic like: # ./test_progs -t cgrp_local_storage Can't find bpf_testmod.ko kernel module: -2 WARNING! Selftests relying on bpf_testmod.ko will be skipped. [ 550.930632] CPU 1 Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000000000000080, era == ffff80000200be34, ra == ffff80000200be00 [ 550.931781] Oops[#1]: [ 550.931966] CPU: 1 PID: 1303 Comm: test_progs Not tainted 6.7.0-rc2-loong-devel-g2f56bb0d2327 #35 a896aca3f4164f09cc346f89f2e09832e07be5f6 [ 550.932215] Hardware name: QEMU QEMU Virtual Machine, BIOS unknown 2/2/2022 [ 550.932403] pc ffff80000200be34 ra ffff80000200be00 tp 9000000108350000 sp 9000000108353dc0 [ 550.932545] a0 0000000000000000 a1 0000000000000517 a2 0000000000000118 a3 00007ffffbb15558 [ 550.932682] a4 00007ffffbb15620 a5 90000001004e7700 a6 0000000000000021 a7 0000000000000118 [ 550.932824] t0 ffff80000200bdc0 t1 0000000000000517 t2 0000000000000517 t3 00007ffff1c06ee0 [ 550.932961] t4 0000555578ae04d0 t5 fffffffffffffff8 t6 0000000000000004 t7 0000000000000020 [ 550.933097] t8 0000000000000040 u0 00000000000007b8 s9 9000000108353e00 s0 90000001004e7700 [ 550.933241] s1 9000000004005000 s2 0000000000000001 s3 0000000000000000 s4 0000555555eb2ec8 [ 550.933379] s5 00007ffffbb15bb8 s6 00007ffff1dafd60 s7 000055555663f610 s8 00007ffff1db0050 [ 550.933520] ra: ffff80000200be00 bpf_prog_98f1b9e767be2a84_on_enter+0x40/0x200 [ 550.933911] ERA: ffff80000200be34 bpf_prog_98f1b9e767be2a84_on_enter+0x74/0x200 [ 550.934105] CRMD: 000000b0 (PLV0 -IE -DA +PG DACF=CC DACM=CC -WE) [ 550.934596] PRMD: 00000004 (PPLV0 +PIE -PWE) [ 550.934712] EUEN: 00000003 (+FPE +SXE -ASXE -BTE) [ 550.934836] ECFG: 00071c1c (LIE=2-4,10-12 VS=7) [ 550.934976] ESTAT: 00010000 [PIL] (IS= ECode=1 EsubCode=0) [ 550.935097] BADV: 0000000000000080 [ 550.935181] PRID: 0014c010 (Loongson-64bit, Loongson-3A5000) [ 550.935291] Modules linked in: [ 550.935391] Process test_progs (pid: 1303, threadinfo=000000006c3b1c41, task=0000000061f84a55) [ 550.935643] Stack : 00007ffffbb15bb8 0000555555eb2ec8 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 [ 550.935844] 9000000004005000 ffff80001b864000 00007ffffbb15450 90000000029aa034 [ 550.935990] 0000000000000000 9000000108353ec0 0000000000000118 d07d9dfb09721a09 [ 550.936175] 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 9000000108353ec0 0000000000000118 [ 550.936314] 9000000101d46ad0 900000000290abf0 000055555663f610 0000000000000000 [ 550.936479] 0000000000000003 9000000108353ec0 00007ffffbb15450 90000000029d7288 [ 550.936635] 00007ffff1dafd60 000055555663f610 0000000000000000 0000000000000003 [ 550.936779] 9000000108353ec0 90000000035dd1f0 00007ffff1dafd58 9000000002841c5c [ 550.936939] 0000000000000119 0000555555eea5a8 00007ffff1d78780 00007ffffbb153e0 [ 550.937083] ffffffffffffffda 00007ffffbb15518 0000000000000040 00007ffffbb15558 [ 550.937224] ... [ 550.937299] Call Trace: [ 550.937521] [<ffff80000200be34>] bpf_prog_98f1b9e767be2a84_on_enter+0x74/0x200 [ 550.937910] [<90000000029aa034>] bpf_trace_run2+0x90/0x154 [ 550.938105] [<900000000290abf0>] syscall_trace_enter.isra.0+0x1cc/0x200 [ 550.938224] [<90000000035dd1f0>] do_syscall+0x48/0x94 [ 550.938319] [<9000000002841c5c>] handle_syscall+0xbc/0x158 [ 550.938477] [ 550.938607] Code: 580009ae 50016000 262402e4 <28c20085> 14092084 03a00084 16000024 03240084 00150006 [ 550.938851] [ 550.939021] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Further investigation shows that this panic is triggered by memory load operations: ptr = bpf_cgrp_storage_get(&map_a, task->cgroups->dfl_cgrp, 0, BPF_LOCAL_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE); The expression `task->cgroups->dfl_cgrp` involves two memory load. Since the field offset fits in imm12 or imm14, we use ldd or ldptrd instructions. But both instructions have the side effect that it will signed-extended the imm operand. Finally, we got the wrong addresses and panics is inevitable. Use a generic ldxd instruction to avoid this kind of issues. With this change, we have: # ./test_progs -t cgrp_local_storage Can't find bpf_testmod.ko kernel module: -2 WARNING! Selftests relying on bpf_testmod.ko will be skipped. test_cgrp_local_storage:PASS:join_cgroup /cgrp_local_storage 0 nsec #48/1 cgrp_local_storage/tp_btf:OK test_attach_cgroup:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec test_attach_cgroup:PASS:prog_attach 0 nsec test_attach_cgroup:PASS:prog_attach 0 nsec libbpf: prog 'update_cookie_tracing': failed to attach: ERROR: strerror_r(-524)=22 test_attach_cgroup:FAIL:prog_attach unexpected error: -524 #48/2 cgrp_local_storage/attach_cgroup:FAIL test_recursion:PASS:skel_open_and_load 0 nsec libbpf: prog 'on_lookup': failed to attach: ERROR: strerror_r(-524)=22 libbpf: prog 'on_lookup': failed to auto-attach: -524 test_recursion:FAIL:skel_attach unexpected error: -524 (errno 524) #48/3 cgrp_local_storage/recursion:FAIL #48/4 cgrp_local_storage/negative:OK #48/5 cgrp_local_storage/cgroup_iter_sleepable:OK test_yes_rcu_lock:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec test_yes_rcu_lock:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec libbpf: prog 'yes_rcu_lock': failed to attach: ERROR: strerror_r(-524)=22 libbpf: prog 'yes_rcu_lock': failed to auto-attach: -524 test_yes_rcu_lock:FAIL:skel_attach unexpected error: -524 (errno 524) #48/6 cgrp_local_storage/yes_rcu_lock:FAIL #48/7 cgrp_local_storage/no_rcu_lock:OK #48 cgrp_local_storage:FAIL All error logs: test_cgrp_local_storage:PASS:join_cgroup /cgrp_local_storage 0 nsec test_attach_cgroup:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec test_attach_cgroup:PASS:prog_attach 0 nsec test_attach_cgroup:PASS:prog_attach 0 nsec libbpf: prog 'update_cookie_tracing': failed to attach: ERROR: strerror_r(-524)=22 test_attach_cgroup:FAIL:prog_attach unexpected error: -524 #48/2 cgrp_local_storage/attach_cgroup:FAIL test_recursion:PASS:skel_open_and_load 0 nsec libbpf: prog 'on_lookup': failed to attach: ERROR: strerror_r(-524)=22 libbpf: prog 'on_lookup': failed to auto-attach: -524 test_recursion:FAIL:skel_attach unexpected error: -524 (errno 524) #48/3 cgrp_local_storage/recursion:FAIL test_yes_rcu_lock:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec test_yes_rcu_lock:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec libbpf: prog 'yes_rcu_lock': failed to attach: ERROR: strerror_r(-524)=22 libbpf: prog 'yes_rcu_lock': failed to auto-attach: -524 test_yes_rcu_lock:FAIL:skel_attach unexpected error: -524 (errno 524) #48/6 cgrp_local_storage/yes_rcu_lock:FAIL #48 cgrp_local_storage:FAIL Summary: 0/4 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED No panics any more (The test still failed because lack of BPF trampoline which I am actively working on). Fixes: 5dc6155 ("LoongArch: Add BPF JIT support") Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>

Currently normal HugeTLB fault ends up crashing the kernel, as p4dp derived from p4d_offset() is an invalid address when PGTABLE_LEVEL = 5. A p4d level entry needs to be allocated when not available while walking the page table during HugeTLB faults. Let's call p4d_alloc() to allocate such entries when required instead of current p4d_offset(). Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffffffff80000000 Mem abort info: ESR = 0x0000000096000005 EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits SET = 0, FnV = 0 EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 FSC = 0x05: level 1 translation fault Data abort info: ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000005, ISS2 = 0x00000000 CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0 GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0 swapper pgtable: 4k pages, 52-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000081da9000 [ffffffff80000000] pgd=1000000082cec003, p4d=0000000082c32003, pud=0000000000000000 Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000005 [kernel-patches#1] PREEMPT SMP Modules linked in: CPU: 1 PID: 108 Comm: high_addr_hugep Not tainted 6.9.0-rc4 kernel-patches#48 Hardware name: Foundation-v8A (DT) pstate: 01402005 (nzcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : huge_pte_alloc+0xd4/0x334 lr : hugetlb_fault+0x1b8/0xc68 sp : ffff8000833bbc20 x29: ffff8000833bbc20 x28: fff000080080cb58 x27: ffff800082a7cc58 x26: 0000000000000000 x25: fff0000800378e40 x24: fff00008008d6c60 x23: 00000000de9dbf07 x22: fff0000800378e40 x21: 0004000000000000 x20: 0004000000000000 x19: ffffffff80000000 x18: 1ffe00010011d7a1 x17: 0000000000000001 x16: ffffffffffffffff x15: 0000000000000001 x14: 0000000000000000 x13: ffff8000816120d0 x12: ffffffffffffffff x11: 0000000000000000 x10: fff00008008ebd0c x9 : 0004000000000000 x8 : 0000000000001255 x7 : fff00008003e2000 x6 : 00000000061d54b0 x5 : 0000000000001000 x4 : ffffffff80000000 x3 : 0000000000200000 x2 : 0000000000000004 x1 : 0000000080000000 x0 : 0000000000000000 Call trace: huge_pte_alloc+0xd4/0x334 hugetlb_fault+0x1b8/0xc68 handle_mm_fault+0x260/0x29c do_page_fault+0xfc/0x47c do_translation_fault+0x68/0x74 do_mem_abort+0x44/0x94 el0_da+0x2c/0x9c el0t_64_sync_handler+0x70/0xc4 el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 Code: aa000084 cb010084 b24c2c84 8b130c93 (f9400260) ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Fixes: a6bbf5d ("arm64: mm: Add definitions to support 5 levels of paging") Reported-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com> Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240415094003.1812018-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

During the migration of Soundwire runtime stream allocation from the Qualcomm Soundwire controller to SoC's soundcard drivers the sdm845 soundcard was forgotten. At this point any playback attempt or audio daemon startup, for instance on sdm845-db845c (Qualcomm RB3 board), will result in stream pointer NULL dereference: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000020 Mem abort info: ESR = 0x0000000096000004 EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits SET = 0, FnV = 0 EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault Data abort info: ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004, ISS2 = 0x00000000 CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0 GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0 user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000101ecf000 [0000000000000020] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000 Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000004 [kernel-patches#1] PREEMPT SMP Modules linked in: ... CPU: 5 UID: 0 PID: 1198 Comm: aplay Not tainted 6.12.0-rc2-qcomlt-arm64-00059-g9d78f315a362-dirty kernel-patches#18 Hardware name: Thundercomm Dragonboard 845c (DT) pstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : sdw_stream_add_slave+0x44/0x380 [soundwire_bus] lr : sdw_stream_add_slave+0x44/0x380 [soundwire_bus] sp : ffff80008a2035c0 x29: ffff80008a2035c0 x28: ffff80008a203978 x27: 0000000000000000 x26: 00000000000000c0 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: ffff1676025f4800 x23: ffff167600ff1cb8 x22: ffff167600ff1c98 x21: 0000000000000003 x20: ffff167607316000 x19: ffff167604e64e80 x18: 0000000000000000 x17: 0000000000000000 x16: ffffcec265074160 x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000 x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000000 x9 : 0000000000000000 x8 : 0000000000000000 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : ffff167600ff1cec x5 : ffffcec22cfa2010 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000003 x2 : ffff167613f836c0 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : ffff16761feb60b8 Call trace: sdw_stream_add_slave+0x44/0x380 [soundwire_bus] wsa881x_hw_params+0x68/0x80 [snd_soc_wsa881x] snd_soc_dai_hw_params+0x3c/0xa4 __soc_pcm_hw_params+0x230/0x660 dpcm_be_dai_hw_params+0x1d0/0x3f8 dpcm_fe_dai_hw_params+0x98/0x268 snd_pcm_hw_params+0x124/0x460 snd_pcm_common_ioctl+0x998/0x16e8 snd_pcm_ioctl+0x34/0x58 __arm64_sys_ioctl+0xac/0xf8 invoke_syscall+0x48/0x104 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x40/0xe0 do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x28 el0_svc+0x34/0xe0 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x120/0x12c el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 Code: aa0403fb f9418400 9100e000 9400102f (f8420f22) ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- 0000000000006108 <sdw_stream_add_slave>: 6108: d503233f paciasp 610c: a9b97bfd stp x29, x30, [sp, #-112]! 6110: 910003fd mov x29, sp 6114: a90153f3 stp x19, x20, [sp, kernel-patches#16] 6118: a9025bf5 stp x21, x22, [sp, kernel-patches#32] 611c: aa0103f6 mov x22, x1 6120: 2a0303f5 mov w21, w3 6124: a90363f7 stp x23, x24, [sp, kernel-patches#48] 6128: aa0003f8 mov x24, x0 612c: aa0203f7 mov x23, x2 6130: a9046bf9 stp x25, x26, [sp, kernel-patches#64] 6134: aa0403f9 mov x25, x4 <-- x4 copied to x25 6138: a90573fb stp x27, x28, [sp, kernel-patches#80] 613c: aa0403fb mov x27, x4 6140: f9418400 ldr x0, [x0, kernel-patches#776] 6144: 9100e000 add x0, x0, #0x38 6148: 94000000 bl 0 <mutex_lock> 614c: f8420f22 ldr x2, [x25, kernel-patches#32]! <-- offset 0x44 ^^^ This is 0x6108 + offset 0x44 from the beginning of sdw_stream_add_slave() where data abort happens. wsa881x_hw_params() is called with stream = NULL and passes it further in register x4 (5th argument) to sdw_stream_add_slave() without any checks. Value from x4 is copied to x25 and finally it aborts on trying to load a value from address in x25 plus offset 32 (in dec) which corresponds to master_list member in struct sdw_stream_runtime: struct sdw_stream_runtime { const char * name; /* 0 8 */ struct sdw_stream_params params; /* 8 12 */ enum sdw_stream_state state; /* 20 4 */ enum sdw_stream_type type; /* 24 4 */ /* XXX 4 bytes hole, try to pack */ here-> struct list_head master_list; /* 32 16 */ int m_rt_count; /* 48 4 */ /* size: 56, cachelines: 1, members: 6 */ /* sum members: 48, holes: 1, sum holes: 4 */ /* padding: 4 */ /* last cacheline: 56 bytes */ Fix this by adding required calls to qcom_snd_sdw_startup() and sdw_release_stream() to startup and shutdown routines which restores the previous correct behaviour when ->set_stream() method is called to set a valid stream runtime pointer on playback startup. Reproduced and then fix was tested on db845c RB3 board. Reported-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 15c7fab ("ASoC: qcom: Move Soundwire runtime stream alloc to soundcards") Cc: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> Cc: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Cc: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@linaro.org> Tested-by: Steev Klimaszewski <steev@kali.org> # Lenovo Yoga C630 Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241009213922.999355-1-alexey.klimov@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

kernel-patches-bot added bpf-next new V1 labels Sep 11, 2020

kernel-patches-bot force-pushed the series/201096 branch from 34a095e to 5bf0b46 Compare September 11, 2020 20:18

kernel-patches-bot force-pushed the series/201096 branch from 5bf0b46 to ccda6f1 Compare September 15, 2020 01:32

kernel-patches-bot force-pushed the series/201096 branch from ccda6f1 to 45308b2 Compare September 15, 2020 01:49

kernel-patches-bot and others added 2 commits September 14, 2020 19:03

adding ci files

a4028b3

kernel-patches-bot force-pushed the series/201096 branch from 45308b2 to f30be94 Compare September 15, 2020 02:03

kernel-patches-bot added changes-requested and removed new labels Sep 15, 2020

kernel-patches-bot closed this Sep 15, 2020

kernel-patches-bot deleted the series/201096 branch September 15, 2020 17:50

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

bpf: selftests: remove shared header from sockmap iter test #48

bpf: selftests: remove shared header from sockmap iter test #48

kernel-patches-bot commented Sep 11, 2020

kernel-patches-bot commented Sep 11, 2020

kernel-patches-bot commented Sep 11, 2020

kernel-patches-bot commented Sep 15, 2020

kernel-patches-bot commented Sep 15, 2020

kernel-patches-bot commented Sep 15, 2020

kernel-patches-bot commented Sep 15, 2020

bpf: selftests: remove shared header from sockmap iter test #48

bpf: selftests: remove shared header from sockmap iter test #48

Conversation

kernel-patches-bot commented Sep 11, 2020

kernel-patches-bot commented Sep 11, 2020

kernel-patches-bot commented Sep 11, 2020

kernel-patches-bot commented Sep 15, 2020

kernel-patches-bot commented Sep 15, 2020

kernel-patches-bot commented Sep 15, 2020

kernel-patches-bot commented Sep 15, 2020