bpf: don't check against device MTU in __bpf_skb_max_len #4

kernel-patches-bot · 2020-09-04T12:40:21Z

Pull request for series with
subject: bpf: don't check against device MTU in __bpf_skb_max_len
version: 1
url: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/?series=199469

kernel-patches-bot · 2020-09-04T12:40:22Z

Master branch: 95cec14
series: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/?series=199469
version: 1

patch https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/159921182827.1260200.9699352760916903781.stgit@firesoul/ applied successfully

kernel-patches-bot · 2020-09-06T02:08:02Z

Master branch: f9bec5d
series: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/?series=199469
version: 1

patch https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/159921182827.1260200.9699352760916903781.stgit@firesoul/ applied successfully

kernel-patches-bot · 2020-09-07T19:23:41Z

Master branch: bc0b5a0
series: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/?series=199469
version: 1

patch https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/159921182827.1260200.9699352760916903781.stgit@firesoul/ applied successfully

kernel-patches-bot · 2020-09-09T03:34:42Z

Master branch: e6054fc
series: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/?series=199469
version: 1

patch https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/159921182827.1260200.9699352760916903781.stgit@firesoul/ applied successfully

… uses __bpf_skb_max_len() as the max-length. This function limit size against the current net_device MTU (skb->dev->mtu). Often packets gets redirected to another net_device, that can have a larger MTU, and this is the MTU that should count. The MTU limiting at this stage seems wrong and redundant as the netstack will handle MTU checking elsewhere. Redirecting into sockmap by sk_skb programs already skip this MTU check. Keep what commit 0c6bc6e ("bpf: fix sk_skb programs without skb->dev assigned") did, and limit the max_len to SKB_MAX_ALLOC. Also notice that the max_len MTU check is already skipped for GRO SKBs (skb_is_gso), in both bpf_skb_adjust_room() and bpf_skb_change_head(). Thus, it is clearly safe to remove this check. Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> --- net/core/filter.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

kernel-patches-bot · 2020-09-09T20:11:31Z

Master branch: 8081ede
series: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/?series=199469
version: 1

patch https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/159921182827.1260200.9699352760916903781.stgit@firesoul/ applied successfully

kernel-patches-bot · 2020-09-10T21:30:02Z

At least one diff in series https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/?series=199469 expired. Closing PR.

I got the following lockdep splat while testing: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.8.0-rc7-00172-g021118712e59 #932 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ btrfs/229626 is trying to acquire lock: ffffffff828513f0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: alloc_workqueue+0x378/0x450 but task is already holding lock: ffff889dd3889518 (&fs_info->scrub_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_scrub_dev+0x11c/0x630 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #7 (&fs_info->scrub_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930 btrfs_scrub_dev+0x11c/0x630 btrfs_dev_replace_by_ioctl.cold.21+0x10a/0x1d4 btrfs_ioctl+0x2799/0x30a0 ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #6 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930 btrfs_run_dev_stats+0x49/0x480 commit_cowonly_roots+0xb5/0x2a0 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x516/0xa60 sync_filesystem+0x6b/0x90 generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100 kill_anon_super+0xe/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 deactivate_locked_super+0x29/0x60 cleanup_mnt+0xb8/0x140 task_work_run+0x6d/0xb0 __prepare_exit_to_usermode+0x1cc/0x1e0 do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #5 (&fs_info->tree_log_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x4bb/0xa60 sync_filesystem+0x6b/0x90 generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100 kill_anon_super+0xe/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 deactivate_locked_super+0x29/0x60 cleanup_mnt+0xb8/0x140 task_work_run+0x6d/0xb0 __prepare_exit_to_usermode+0x1cc/0x1e0 do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #4 (&fs_info->reloc_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930 btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x43/0x70 start_transaction+0xd1/0x5d0 btrfs_dirty_inode+0x42/0xd0 touch_atime+0xa1/0xd0 btrfs_file_mmap+0x3f/0x60 mmap_region+0x3a4/0x640 do_mmap+0x376/0x580 vm_mmap_pgoff+0xd5/0x120 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x193/0x230 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #3 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}: __might_fault+0x68/0x90 _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x80 perf_read+0x141/0x2c0 vfs_read+0xad/0x1b0 ksys_read+0x5f/0xe0 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #2 (&cpuctx_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930 perf_event_init_cpu+0x88/0x150 perf_event_init+0x1db/0x20b start_kernel+0x3ae/0x53c secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0 -> #1 (pmus_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930 perf_event_init_cpu+0x4f/0x150 cpuhp_invoke_callback+0xb1/0x900 _cpu_up.constprop.26+0x9f/0x130 cpu_up+0x7b/0xc0 bringup_nonboot_cpus+0x4f/0x60 smp_init+0x26/0x71 kernel_init_freeable+0x110/0x258 kernel_init+0xa/0x103 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310 lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360 cpus_read_lock+0x39/0xb0 alloc_workqueue+0x378/0x450 __btrfs_alloc_workqueue+0x15d/0x200 btrfs_alloc_workqueue+0x51/0x160 scrub_workers_get+0x5a/0x170 btrfs_scrub_dev+0x18c/0x630 btrfs_dev_replace_by_ioctl.cold.21+0x10a/0x1d4 btrfs_ioctl+0x2799/0x30a0 ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: cpu_hotplug_lock --> &fs_devs->device_list_mutex --> &fs_info->scrub_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&fs_info->scrub_lock); lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex); lock(&fs_info->scrub_lock); lock(cpu_hotplug_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by btrfs/229626: #0: ffff88bfe8bb86e0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_scrub_dev+0xbd/0x630 #1: ffff889dd3889518 (&fs_info->scrub_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_scrub_dev+0x11c/0x630 stack backtrace: CPU: 15 PID: 229626 Comm: btrfs Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.8.0-rc7-00172-g021118712e59 #932 Hardware name: Quanta Tioga Pass Single Side 01-0030993006/Tioga Pass Single Side, BIOS F08_3A18 12/20/2018 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x78/0xa0 check_noncircular+0x165/0x180 __lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310 lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360 ? alloc_workqueue+0x378/0x450 cpus_read_lock+0x39/0xb0 ? alloc_workqueue+0x378/0x450 alloc_workqueue+0x378/0x450 ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x52/0x80 __btrfs_alloc_workqueue+0x15d/0x200 btrfs_alloc_workqueue+0x51/0x160 scrub_workers_get+0x5a/0x170 btrfs_scrub_dev+0x18c/0x630 ? start_transaction+0xd1/0x5d0 btrfs_dev_replace_by_ioctl.cold.21+0x10a/0x1d4 btrfs_ioctl+0x2799/0x30a0 ? do_sigaction+0x102/0x250 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xca/0x160 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x30 ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1c/0xe0 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x30 ? do_sigaction+0x102/0x250 ? ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0 ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 This happens because we're allocating the scrub workqueues under the scrub and device list mutex, which brings in a whole host of other dependencies. Because the work queue allocation is done with GFP_KERNEL, it can trigger reclaim, which can lead to a transaction commit, which in turns needs the device_list_mutex, it can lead to a deadlock. A different problem for which this fix is a solution. Fix this by moving the actual allocation outside of the scrub lock, and then only take the lock once we're ready to actually assign them to the fs_info. We'll now have to cleanup the workqueues in a few more places, so I've added a helper to do the refcount dance to safely free the workqueues. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

…s metrics" test Linux 5.9 introduced perf test case "Parse and process metrics" and on s390 this test case always dumps core: [root@t35lp67 perf]# ./perf test -vvvv -F 67 67: Parse and process metrics : --- start --- metric expr inst_retired.any / cpu_clk_unhalted.thread for IPC parsing metric: inst_retired.any / cpu_clk_unhalted.thread Segmentation fault (core dumped) [root@t35lp67 perf]# I debugged this core dump and gdb shows this call chain: (gdb) where #0 0x000003ffabc3192a in __strnlen_c_1 () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #1 0x000003ffabc293de in strcasestr () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #2 0x0000000001102ba2 in match_metric(list=0x1e6ea20 "inst_retired.any", n=<optimized out>) at util/metricgroup.c:368 #3 find_metric (map=<optimized out>, map=<optimized out>, metric=0x1e6ea20 "inst_retired.any") at util/metricgroup.c:765 #4 __resolve_metric (ids=0x0, map=<optimized out>, metric_list=0x0, metric_no_group=<optimized out>, m=<optimized out>) at util/metricgroup.c:844 #5 resolve_metric (ids=0x0, map=0x0, metric_list=0x0, metric_no_group=<optimized out>) at util/metricgroup.c:881 #6 metricgroup__add_metric (metric=<optimized out>, metric_no_group=metric_no_group@entry=false, events=<optimized out>, events@entry=0x3ffd84fb878, metric_list=0x0, metric_list@entry=0x3ffd84fb868, map=0x0) at util/metricgroup.c:943 #7 0x00000000011034ae in metricgroup__add_metric_list (map=0x13f9828 <map>, metric_list=0x3ffd84fb868, events=0x3ffd84fb878, metric_no_group=<optimized out>, list=<optimized out>) at util/metricgroup.c:988 #8 parse_groups (perf_evlist=perf_evlist@entry=0x1e70260, str=str@entry=0x12f34b2 "IPC", metric_no_group=<optimized out>, metric_no_merge=<optimized out>, fake_pmu=fake_pmu@entry=0x1462f18 <perf_pmu.fake>, metric_events=0x3ffd84fba58, map=0x1) at util/metricgroup.c:1040 #9 0x0000000001103eb2 in metricgroup__parse_groups_test( evlist=evlist@entry=0x1e70260, map=map@entry=0x13f9828 <map>, str=str@entry=0x12f34b2 "IPC", metric_no_group=metric_no_group@entry=false, metric_no_merge=metric_no_merge@entry=false, metric_events=0x3ffd84fba58) at util/metricgroup.c:1082 #10 0x00000000010c84d8 in __compute_metric (ratio2=0x0, name2=0x0, ratio1=<synthetic pointer>, name1=0x12f34b2 "IPC", vals=0x3ffd84fbad8, name=0x12f34b2 "IPC") at tests/parse-metric.c:159 #11 compute_metric (ratio=<synthetic pointer>, vals=0x3ffd84fbad8, name=0x12f34b2 "IPC") at tests/parse-metric.c:189 #12 test_ipc () at tests/parse-metric.c:208 ..... ..... omitted many more lines This test case was added with commit 218ca91 ("perf tests: Add parse metric test for frontend metric"). When I compile with make DEBUG=y it works fine and I do not get a core dump. It turned out that the above listed function call chain worked on a struct pmu_event array which requires a trailing element with zeroes which was missing. The marco map_for_each_event() loops over that array tests for members metric_expr/metric_name/metric_group being non-NULL. Adding this element fixes the issue. Output after: [root@t35lp46 perf]# ./perf test 67 67: Parse and process metrics : Ok [root@t35lp46 perf]# Committer notes: As Ian remarks, this is not s390 specific: <quote Ian> This also shows up with address sanitizer on all architectures (perhaps change the patch title) and perhaps add a "Fixes: <commit>" tag. ================================================================= ==4718==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: global-buffer-overflow on address 0x55c93b4d59e8 at pc 0x55c93a1541e2 bp 0x7ffd24327c60 sp 0x7ffd24327c58 READ of size 8 at 0x55c93b4d59e8 thread T0 #0 0x55c93a1541e1 in find_metric tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c:764:2 #1 0x55c93a153e6c in __resolve_metric tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c:844:9 #2 0x55c93a152f18 in resolve_metric tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c:881:9 #3 0x55c93a1528db in metricgroup__add_metric tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c:943:9 #4 0x55c93a151996 in metricgroup__add_metric_list tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c:988:9 #5 0x55c93a1511b9 in parse_groups tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c:1040:8 #6 0x55c93a1513e1 in metricgroup__parse_groups_test tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c:1082:9 #7 0x55c93a0108ae in __compute_metric tools/perf/tests/parse-metric.c:159:8 #8 0x55c93a010744 in compute_metric tools/perf/tests/parse-metric.c:189:9 #9 0x55c93a00f5ee in test_ipc tools/perf/tests/parse-metric.c:208:2 #10 0x55c93a00f1e8 in test__parse_metric tools/perf/tests/parse-metric.c:345:2 #11 0x55c939fd7202 in run_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:410:9 #12 0x55c939fd6736 in test_and_print tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:440:9 #13 0x55c939fd58c3 in __cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:661:4 #14 0x55c939fd4e02 in cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:807:9 #15 0x55c939e4763d in run_builtin tools/perf/perf.c:313:11 #16 0x55c939e46475 in handle_internal_command tools/perf/perf.c:365:8 #17 0x55c939e4737e in run_argv tools/perf/perf.c:409:2 #18 0x55c939e45f7e in main tools/perf/perf.c:539:3 0x55c93b4d59e8 is located 0 bytes to the right of global variable 'pme_test' defined in 'tools/perf/tests/parse-metric.c:17:25' (0x55c93b4d54a0) of size 1352 SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: global-buffer-overflow tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c:764:2 in find_metric Shadow bytes around the buggy address: 0x0ab9a7692ae0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x0ab9a7692af0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x0ab9a7692b00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x0ab9a7692b10: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x0ab9a7692b20: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 =>0x0ab9a7692b30: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00[f9]f9 f9 0x0ab9a7692b40: f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 0x0ab9a7692b50: f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 0x0ab9a7692b60: f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x0ab9a7692b70: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x0ab9a7692b80: f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 Shadow byte legend (one shadow byte represents 8 application bytes): Addressable: 00 Partially addressable: 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 Heap left redzone: fa Freed heap region: fd Stack left redzone: f1 Stack mid redzone: f2 Stack right redzone: f3 Stack after return: f5 Stack use after scope: f8 Global redzone: f9 Global init order: f6 Poisoned by user: f7 Container overflow: fc Array cookie: ac Intra object redzone: bb ASan internal: fe Left alloca redzone: ca Right alloca redzone: cb Shadow gap: cc </quote> I'm also adding the missing "Fixes" tag and setting just .name to NULL, as doing it that way is more compact (the compiler will zero out everything else) and the table iterators look for .name being NULL as the sentinel marking the end of the table. Fixes: 0a507af ("perf tests: Add parse metric test for ipc metric") Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Sumanth Korikkar <sumanthk@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200825071211.16959-1-tmricht@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

Krzysztof Kozlowski says: ==================== nfc: s3fwrn5: Few cleanups Changes since v2: 1. Fix dtschema ID after rename (patch 1/8). 2. Apply patch 9/9 (defconfig change). Changes since v1: 1. Rename dtschema file and add additionalProperties:false, as Rob suggested, 2. Add Marek's tested-by, 3. New patches: #4, #5, #6, #7 and #9. ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

When compiling with DEBUG=1 on Fedora 32 I'm getting crash for 'perf test signal': Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x0000000000c68548 in __test_function () (gdb) bt #0 0x0000000000c68548 in __test_function () #1 0x00000000004d62e9 in test_function () at tests/bp_signal.c:61 #2 0x00000000004d689a in test__bp_signal (test=0xa8e280 <generic_ ... #3 0x00000000004b7d49 in run_test (test=0xa8e280 <generic_tests+1 ... #4 0x00000000004b7e7f in test_and_print (t=0xa8e280 <generic_test ... #5 0x00000000004b8927 in __cmd_test (argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffdce0, ... ... It's caused by the symbol __test_function being in the ".bss" section: $ readelf -a ./perf | less [Nr] Name Type Address Offset Size EntSize Flags Link Info Align ... [28] .bss NOBITS 0000000000c356a0 008346a0 00000000000511f8 0000000000000000 WA 0 0 32 $ nm perf | grep __test_function 0000000000c68548 B __test_function I guess most of the time we're just lucky the inline asm ended up in the ".text" section, so making it specific explicit with push and pop section clauses. $ readelf -a ./perf | less [Nr] Name Type Address Offset Size EntSize Flags Link Info Align ... [13] .text PROGBITS 0000000000431240 00031240 0000000000306faa 0000000000000000 AX 0 0 16 $ nm perf | grep __test_function 00000000004d62c8 T __test_function Committer testing: $ readelf -wi ~/bin/perf | grep producer -m1 <c> DW_AT_producer : (indirect string, offset: 0x254a): GNU C99 10.2.1 20200723 (Red Hat 10.2.1-1) -mtune=generic -march=x86-64 -ggdb3 -std=gnu99 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -funwind-tables -fstack-protector-all ^^^^^ ^^^^^ ^^^^^ $ Before: $ perf test signal 20: Breakpoint overflow signal handler : FAILED! $ After: $ perf test signal 20: Breakpoint overflow signal handler : Ok $ Fixes: 8fd34e1 ("perf test: Improve bp_signal") Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Michael Petlan <mpetlan@redhat.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200911130005.1842138-1-jolsa@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

Ido Schimmel says: ==================== mlxsw: Derive SBIB from maximum port speed & MTU Petr says: Internal buffer is a part of port headroom used for packets that are mirrored due to triggers that the Spectrum ASIC considers "egress". Besides ACL mirroring on port egresss this includes also packets mirrored due to ECN marking. This patchset changes the way the internal mirroring buffer is reserved. Currently the buffer reflects port MTU and speed accurately. In the future, mlxsw should support dcbnl_setbuffer hook to allow the users to set buffer sizes by hand. In that case, there might not be enough space for growth of the internal mirroring buffer due to MTU and speed changes. While vetoing MTU changes would be merely confusing, port speed changes cannot be vetoed, and such change would simply lead to issues in packet mirroring. For these reasons, with these patches the internal mirroring buffer is derived from maximum MTU and maximum speed achievable on the port. Patches #1 and #2 introduce a new callback to determine the maximum speed a given port can achieve. With patches #3 and #4, the information about, respectively, maximum MTU and maximum port speed, is kept in struct mlxsw_sp_port. In patch #5, maximum MTU and maximum speed are used to determine the size of the internal buffer. MTU update and speed update hooks are dropped, because they are no longer necessary. ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The aliases were never released causing the following leaks: Indirect leak of 1224 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x7feefb830628 in malloc (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5+0x107628) #1 0x56332c8f1b62 in __perf_pmu__new_alias util/pmu.c:322 #2 0x56332c8f401f in pmu_add_cpu_aliases_map util/pmu.c:778 #3 0x56332c792ce9 in __test__pmu_event_aliases tests/pmu-events.c:295 #4 0x56332c792ce9 in test_aliases tests/pmu-events.c:367 #5 0x56332c76a09b in run_test tests/builtin-test.c:410 #6 0x56332c76a09b in test_and_print tests/builtin-test.c:440 #7 0x56332c76ce69 in __cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:695 #8 0x56332c76ce69 in cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:807 #9 0x56332c7d2214 in run_builtin /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:312 #10 0x56332c6701a8 in handle_internal_command /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:364 #11 0x56332c6701a8 in run_argv /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:408 #12 0x56332c6701a8 in main /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:538 #13 0x7feefb359cc9 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308 Fixes: 956a783 ("perf test: Test pmu-events aliases") Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200915031819.386559-11-namhyung@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

The evsel->unit borrows a pointer of pmu event or alias instead of owns a string. But tool event (duration_time) passes a result of strdup() caused a leak. It was found by ASAN during metric test: Direct leak of 210 byte(s) in 70 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x7fe366fca0b5 in strdup (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5+0x920b5) #1 0x559fbbcc6ea3 in add_event_tool util/parse-events.c:414 #2 0x559fbbcc6ea3 in parse_events_add_tool util/parse-events.c:1414 #3 0x559fbbd8474d in parse_events_parse util/parse-events.y:439 #4 0x559fbbcc95da in parse_events__scanner util/parse-events.c:2096 #5 0x559fbbcc95da in __parse_events util/parse-events.c:2141 #6 0x559fbbc28555 in check_parse_id tests/pmu-events.c:406 #7 0x559fbbc28555 in check_parse_id tests/pmu-events.c:393 #8 0x559fbbc28555 in check_parse_cpu tests/pmu-events.c:415 #9 0x559fbbc28555 in test_parsing tests/pmu-events.c:498 #10 0x559fbbc0109b in run_test tests/builtin-test.c:410 #11 0x559fbbc0109b in test_and_print tests/builtin-test.c:440 #12 0x559fbbc03e69 in __cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:695 #13 0x559fbbc03e69 in cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:807 #14 0x559fbbc691f4 in run_builtin /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:312 #15 0x559fbbb071a8 in handle_internal_command /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:364 #16 0x559fbbb071a8 in run_argv /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:408 #17 0x559fbbb071a8 in main /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:538 #18 0x7fe366b68cc9 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308 Fixes: f0fbb11 ("perf stat: Implement duration_time as a proper event") Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200915031819.386559-6-namhyung@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

The test_generic_metric() missed to release entries in the pctx. Asan reported following leak (and more): Direct leak of 128 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x7f4c9396980e in calloc (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5+0x10780e) #1 0x55f7e748cc14 in hashmap_grow (/home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf+0x90cc14) #2 0x55f7e748d497 in hashmap__insert (/home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf+0x90d497) #3 0x55f7e7341667 in hashmap__set /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/util/hashmap.h:111 #4 0x55f7e7341667 in expr__add_ref util/expr.c:120 #5 0x55f7e7292436 in prepare_metric util/stat-shadow.c:783 #6 0x55f7e729556d in test_generic_metric util/stat-shadow.c:858 #7 0x55f7e712390b in compute_single tests/parse-metric.c:128 #8 0x55f7e712390b in __compute_metric tests/parse-metric.c:180 #9 0x55f7e712446d in compute_metric tests/parse-metric.c:196 #10 0x55f7e712446d in test_dcache_l2 tests/parse-metric.c:295 #11 0x55f7e712446d in test__parse_metric tests/parse-metric.c:355 #12 0x55f7e70be09b in run_test tests/builtin-test.c:410 #13 0x55f7e70be09b in test_and_print tests/builtin-test.c:440 #14 0x55f7e70c101a in __cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:661 #15 0x55f7e70c101a in cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:807 #16 0x55f7e7126214 in run_builtin /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:312 #17 0x55f7e6fc41a8 in handle_internal_command /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:364 #18 0x55f7e6fc41a8 in run_argv /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:408 #19 0x55f7e6fc41a8 in main /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:538 #20 0x7f4c93492cc9 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308 Fixes: 6d432c4 ("perf tools: Add test_generic_metric function") Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200915031819.386559-8-namhyung@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

The metricgroup__add_metric() can find multiple match for a metric group and it's possible to fail. Also it can fail in the middle like in resolve_metric() even for single metric. In those cases, the intermediate list and ids will be leaked like: Direct leak of 3 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x7f4c938f40b5 in strdup (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5+0x920b5) #1 0x55f7e71c1bef in __add_metric util/metricgroup.c:683 #2 0x55f7e71c31d0 in add_metric util/metricgroup.c:906 #3 0x55f7e71c3844 in metricgroup__add_metric util/metricgroup.c:940 #4 0x55f7e71c488d in metricgroup__add_metric_list util/metricgroup.c:993 #5 0x55f7e71c488d in parse_groups util/metricgroup.c:1045 #6 0x55f7e71c60a4 in metricgroup__parse_groups_test util/metricgroup.c:1087 #7 0x55f7e71235ae in __compute_metric tests/parse-metric.c:164 #8 0x55f7e7124650 in compute_metric tests/parse-metric.c:196 #9 0x55f7e7124650 in test_recursion_fail tests/parse-metric.c:318 #10 0x55f7e7124650 in test__parse_metric tests/parse-metric.c:356 #11 0x55f7e70be09b in run_test tests/builtin-test.c:410 #12 0x55f7e70be09b in test_and_print tests/builtin-test.c:440 #13 0x55f7e70c101a in __cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:661 #14 0x55f7e70c101a in cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:807 #15 0x55f7e7126214 in run_builtin /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:312 #16 0x55f7e6fc41a8 in handle_internal_command /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:364 #17 0x55f7e6fc41a8 in run_argv /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:408 #18 0x55f7e6fc41a8 in main /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:538 #19 0x7f4c93492cc9 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308 Fixes: 83de0b7 ("perf metric: Collect referenced metrics in struct metric_ref_node") Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200915031819.386559-9-namhyung@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

The following leaks were detected by ASAN: Indirect leak of 360 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x7fecc305180e in calloc (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5+0x10780e) #1 0x560578f6dce5 in perf_pmu__new_format util/pmu.c:1333 #2 0x560578f752fc in perf_pmu_parse util/pmu.y:59 #3 0x560578f6a8b7 in perf_pmu__format_parse util/pmu.c:73 #4 0x560578e07045 in test__pmu tests/pmu.c:155 #5 0x560578de109b in run_test tests/builtin-test.c:410 #6 0x560578de109b in test_and_print tests/builtin-test.c:440 #7 0x560578de401a in __cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:661 #8 0x560578de401a in cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:807 #9 0x560578e49354 in run_builtin /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:312 #10 0x560578ce71a8 in handle_internal_command /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:364 #11 0x560578ce71a8 in run_argv /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:408 #12 0x560578ce71a8 in main /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:538 #13 0x7fecc2b7acc9 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308 Fixes: cff7f95 ("perf tests: Move pmu tests into separate object") Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200915031819.386559-12-namhyung@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

Ido Schimmel says: ==================== mlxsw: Expose transceiver overheat counter Amit says: An overheated transceiver can be the root cause of various network problems such as link flapping. Counting the number of times a transceiver's temperature was higher than its configured threshold can therefore help in debugging such issues. This patch set exposes a transceiver overheat counter via ethtool. This is achieved by configuring the Spectrum ASIC to generate events whenever a transceiver is overheated. The temperature thresholds are queried from the transceiver (if available) and set to the default otherwise. Example: ... transceiver_overheat: 2 Patch set overview: Patches #1-#3 add required device registers Patches #4-#5 add required infrastructure in mlxsw to configure and count overheat events Patches #6-#9 gradually add support for the transceiver overheat counter Patch #10 exposes the transceiver overheat counter via ethtool ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Attempt to enable IPsec packet offload in tunnel mode in debug kernel generates the following kernel panic, which is happening due to two issues: 1. In SA add section, the should be _bh() variant when marking SA mode. 2. There is not needed flush_workqueue in SA delete routine. It is not needed as at this stage as it is removed from SADB and the running work will be canceled later in SA free. ===================================================== WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected 6.12.0+ kernel-patches#4 Not tainted ----------------------------------------------------- charon/1337 [HC0[0]:SC0[4]:HE1:SE0] is trying to acquire: ffff88810f365020 (&xa->xa_lock#24){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5e_xfrm_del_state+0xca/0x1e0 [mlx5_core] and this task is already holding: ffff88813e0f0d48 (&x->lock){+.-.}-{3:3}, at: xfrm_state_delete+0x16/0x30 which would create a new lock dependency: (&x->lock){+.-.}-{3:3} -> (&xa->xa_lock#24){+.+.}-{3:3} but this new dependency connects a SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock: (&x->lock){+.-.}-{3:3} ... which became SOFTIRQ-irq-safe at: lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 xfrm_timer_handler+0x91/0xd70 __hrtimer_run_queues+0x1dd/0xa60 hrtimer_run_softirq+0x146/0x2e0 handle_softirqs+0x266/0x860 irq_exit_rcu+0x115/0x1a0 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6e/0x90 asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x16/0x20 default_idle+0x13/0x20 default_idle_call+0x67/0xa0 do_idle+0x2da/0x320 cpu_startup_entry+0x50/0x60 start_secondary+0x213/0x2a0 common_startup_64+0x129/0x138 to a SOFTIRQ-irq-unsafe lock: (&xa->xa_lock#24){+.+.}-{3:3} ... which became SOFTIRQ-irq-unsafe at: ... lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 _raw_spin_lock+0x2c/0x40 xa_set_mark+0x70/0x110 mlx5e_xfrm_add_state+0xe48/0x2290 [mlx5_core] xfrm_dev_state_add+0x3bb/0xd70 xfrm_add_sa+0x2451/0x4a90 xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x493/0x880 netlink_rcv_skb+0x12e/0x380 xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x6d/0x90 netlink_unicast+0x42f/0x740 netlink_sendmsg+0x745/0xbe0 __sock_sendmsg+0xc5/0x190 __sys_sendto+0x1fe/0x2c0 __x64_sys_sendto+0xdc/0x1b0 do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 other info that might help us debug this: Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&xa->xa_lock#24); local_irq_disable(); lock(&x->lock); lock(&xa->xa_lock#24); <Interrupt> lock(&x->lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by charon/1337: #0: ffffffff87f8f858 (&net->xfrm.xfrm_cfg_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x5e/0x90 kernel-patches#1: ffff88813e0f0d48 (&x->lock){+.-.}-{3:3}, at: xfrm_state_delete+0x16/0x30 the dependencies between SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock and the holding lock: -> (&x->lock){+.-.}-{3:3} ops: 29 { HARDIRQ-ON-W at: lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 xfrm_alloc_spi+0xc0/0xe60 xfrm_alloc_userspi+0x5f6/0xbc0 xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x493/0x880 netlink_rcv_skb+0x12e/0x380 xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x6d/0x90 netlink_unicast+0x42f/0x740 netlink_sendmsg+0x745/0xbe0 __sock_sendmsg+0xc5/0x190 __sys_sendto+0x1fe/0x2c0 __x64_sys_sendto+0xdc/0x1b0 do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 IN-SOFTIRQ-W at: lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 xfrm_timer_handler+0x91/0xd70 __hrtimer_run_queues+0x1dd/0xa60 hrtimer_run_softirq+0x146/0x2e0 handle_softirqs+0x266/0x860 irq_exit_rcu+0x115/0x1a0 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6e/0x90 asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x16/0x20 default_idle+0x13/0x20 default_idle_call+0x67/0xa0 do_idle+0x2da/0x320 cpu_startup_entry+0x50/0x60 start_secondary+0x213/0x2a0 common_startup_64+0x129/0x138 INITIAL USE at: lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 xfrm_alloc_spi+0xc0/0xe60 xfrm_alloc_userspi+0x5f6/0xbc0 xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x493/0x880 netlink_rcv_skb+0x12e/0x380 xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x6d/0x90 netlink_unicast+0x42f/0x740 netlink_sendmsg+0x745/0xbe0 __sock_sendmsg+0xc5/0x190 __sys_sendto+0x1fe/0x2c0 __x64_sys_sendto+0xdc/0x1b0 do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 } ... key at: [<ffffffff87f9cd20>] __key.18+0x0/0x40 the dependencies between the lock to be acquired and SOFTIRQ-irq-unsafe lock: -> (&xa->xa_lock#24){+.+.}-{3:3} ops: 9 { HARDIRQ-ON-W at: lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 mlx5e_xfrm_add_state+0xc5b/0x2290 [mlx5_core] xfrm_dev_state_add+0x3bb/0xd70 xfrm_add_sa+0x2451/0x4a90 xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x493/0x880 netlink_rcv_skb+0x12e/0x380 xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x6d/0x90 netlink_unicast+0x42f/0x740 netlink_sendmsg+0x745/0xbe0 __sock_sendmsg+0xc5/0x190 __sys_sendto+0x1fe/0x2c0 __x64_sys_sendto+0xdc/0x1b0 do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 SOFTIRQ-ON-W at: lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 _raw_spin_lock+0x2c/0x40 xa_set_mark+0x70/0x110 mlx5e_xfrm_add_state+0xe48/0x2290 [mlx5_core] xfrm_dev_state_add+0x3bb/0xd70 xfrm_add_sa+0x2451/0x4a90 xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x493/0x880 netlink_rcv_skb+0x12e/0x380 xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x6d/0x90 netlink_unicast+0x42f/0x740 netlink_sendmsg+0x745/0xbe0 __sock_sendmsg+0xc5/0x190 __sys_sendto+0x1fe/0x2c0 __x64_sys_sendto+0xdc/0x1b0 do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 INITIAL USE at: lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 mlx5e_xfrm_add_state+0xc5b/0x2290 [mlx5_core] xfrm_dev_state_add+0x3bb/0xd70 xfrm_add_sa+0x2451/0x4a90 xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x493/0x880 netlink_rcv_skb+0x12e/0x380 xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x6d/0x90 netlink_unicast+0x42f/0x740 netlink_sendmsg+0x745/0xbe0 __sock_sendmsg+0xc5/0x190 __sys_sendto+0x1fe/0x2c0 __x64_sys_sendto+0xdc/0x1b0 do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 } ... key at: [<ffffffffa078ff60>] __key.48+0x0/0xfffffffffff210a0 [mlx5_core] ... acquired at: __lock_acquire+0x30a0/0x5040 lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 mlx5e_xfrm_del_state+0xca/0x1e0 [mlx5_core] xfrm_dev_state_delete+0x90/0x160 __xfrm_state_delete+0x662/0xae0 xfrm_state_delete+0x1e/0x30 xfrm_del_sa+0x1c2/0x340 xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x493/0x880 netlink_rcv_skb+0x12e/0x380 xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x6d/0x90 netlink_unicast+0x42f/0x740 netlink_sendmsg+0x745/0xbe0 __sock_sendmsg+0xc5/0x190 __sys_sendto+0x1fe/0x2c0 __x64_sys_sendto+0xdc/0x1b0 do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 stack backtrace: CPU: 7 UID: 0 PID: 1337 Comm: charon Not tainted 6.12.0+ kernel-patches#4 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x74/0xd0 check_irq_usage+0x12e8/0x1d90 ? print_shortest_lock_dependencies_backwards+0x1b0/0x1b0 ? check_chain_key+0x1bb/0x4c0 ? __lockdep_reset_lock+0x180/0x180 ? check_path.constprop.0+0x24/0x50 ? mark_lock+0x108/0x2fb0 ? print_circular_bug+0x9b0/0x9b0 ? mark_lock+0x108/0x2fb0 ? print_usage_bug.part.0+0x670/0x670 ? check_prev_add+0x1c4/0x2310 check_prev_add+0x1c4/0x2310 __lock_acquire+0x30a0/0x5040 ? lockdep_set_lock_cmp_fn+0x190/0x190 ? lockdep_set_lock_cmp_fn+0x190/0x190 lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 ? mlx5e_xfrm_del_state+0xca/0x1e0 [mlx5_core] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x400/0x400 ? __xfrm_state_delete+0x5f0/0xae0 ? lock_downgrade+0x6b0/0x6b0 _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 ? mlx5e_xfrm_del_state+0xca/0x1e0 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_xfrm_del_state+0xca/0x1e0 [mlx5_core] xfrm_dev_state_delete+0x90/0x160 __xfrm_state_delete+0x662/0xae0 xfrm_state_delete+0x1e/0x30 xfrm_del_sa+0x1c2/0x340 ? xfrm_get_sa+0x250/0x250 ? check_chain_key+0x1bb/0x4c0 xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x493/0x880 ? copy_sec_ctx+0x270/0x270 ? check_chain_key+0x1bb/0x4c0 ? lockdep_set_lock_cmp_fn+0x190/0x190 ? lockdep_set_lock_cmp_fn+0x190/0x190 netlink_rcv_skb+0x12e/0x380 ? copy_sec_ctx+0x270/0x270 ? netlink_ack+0xd90/0xd90 ? netlink_deliver_tap+0xcd/0xb60 xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x6d/0x90 netlink_unicast+0x42f/0x740 ? netlink_attachskb+0x730/0x730 ? lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 netlink_sendmsg+0x745/0xbe0 ? netlink_unicast+0x740/0x740 ? __might_fault+0xbb/0x170 ? netlink_unicast+0x740/0x740 __sock_sendmsg+0xc5/0x190 ? fdget+0x163/0x1d0 __sys_sendto+0x1fe/0x2c0 ? __x64_sys_getpeername+0xb0/0xb0 ? do_user_addr_fault+0x856/0xe30 ? lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 ? __task_pid_nr_ns+0x117/0x410 ? lock_downgrade+0x6b0/0x6b0 __x64_sys_sendto+0xdc/0x1b0 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x284/0x400 do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 RIP: 0033:0x7f7d31291ba4 Code: 7d e8 89 4d d4 e8 4c 42 f7 ff 44 8b 4d d0 4c 8b 45 c8 89 c3 44 8b 55 d4 8b 7d e8 b8 2c 00 00 00 48 8b 55 d8 48 8b 75 e0 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 34 89 df 48 89 45 e8 e8 99 42 f7 ff 48 8b 45 RSP: 002b:00007f7d2ccd94f0 EFLAGS: 00000297 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 00007f7d31291ba4 RDX: 0000000000000028 RSI: 00007f7d2ccd96a0 RDI: 000000000000000a RBP: 00007f7d2ccd9530 R08: 00007f7d2ccd9598 R09: 000000000000000c R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000297 R12: 0000000000000028 R13: 00007f7d2ccd9598 R14: 00007f7d2ccd96a0 R15: 00000000000000e1 </TASK> Fixes: 4c24272 ("net/mlx5e: Listen to ARP events to update IPsec L2 headers in tunnel mode") Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NipaLocal <nipa@local>

Attempt to enable IPsec packet offload in tunnel mode in debug kernel generates the following kernel panic, which is happening due to two issues: 1. In SA add section, the should be _bh() variant when marking SA mode. 2. There is not needed flush_workqueue in SA delete routine. It is not needed as at this stage as it is removed from SADB and the running work will be canceled later in SA free. ===================================================== WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected 6.12.0+ kernel-patches#4 Not tainted ----------------------------------------------------- charon/1337 [HC0[0]:SC0[4]:HE1:SE0] is trying to acquire: ffff88810f365020 (&xa->xa_lock#24){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5e_xfrm_del_state+0xca/0x1e0 [mlx5_core] and this task is already holding: ffff88813e0f0d48 (&x->lock){+.-.}-{3:3}, at: xfrm_state_delete+0x16/0x30 which would create a new lock dependency: (&x->lock){+.-.}-{3:3} -> (&xa->xa_lock#24){+.+.}-{3:3} but this new dependency connects a SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock: (&x->lock){+.-.}-{3:3} ... which became SOFTIRQ-irq-safe at: lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 xfrm_timer_handler+0x91/0xd70 __hrtimer_run_queues+0x1dd/0xa60 hrtimer_run_softirq+0x146/0x2e0 handle_softirqs+0x266/0x860 irq_exit_rcu+0x115/0x1a0 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6e/0x90 asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x16/0x20 default_idle+0x13/0x20 default_idle_call+0x67/0xa0 do_idle+0x2da/0x320 cpu_startup_entry+0x50/0x60 start_secondary+0x213/0x2a0 common_startup_64+0x129/0x138 to a SOFTIRQ-irq-unsafe lock: (&xa->xa_lock#24){+.+.}-{3:3} ... which became SOFTIRQ-irq-unsafe at: ... lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 _raw_spin_lock+0x2c/0x40 xa_set_mark+0x70/0x110 mlx5e_xfrm_add_state+0xe48/0x2290 [mlx5_core] xfrm_dev_state_add+0x3bb/0xd70 xfrm_add_sa+0x2451/0x4a90 xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x493/0x880 netlink_rcv_skb+0x12e/0x380 xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x6d/0x90 netlink_unicast+0x42f/0x740 netlink_sendmsg+0x745/0xbe0 __sock_sendmsg+0xc5/0x190 __sys_sendto+0x1fe/0x2c0 __x64_sys_sendto+0xdc/0x1b0 do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 other info that might help us debug this: Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&xa->xa_lock#24); local_irq_disable(); lock(&x->lock); lock(&xa->xa_lock#24); <Interrupt> lock(&x->lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by charon/1337: #0: ffffffff87f8f858 (&net->xfrm.xfrm_cfg_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x5e/0x90 kernel-patches#1: ffff88813e0f0d48 (&x->lock){+.-.}-{3:3}, at: xfrm_state_delete+0x16/0x30 the dependencies between SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock and the holding lock: -> (&x->lock){+.-.}-{3:3} ops: 29 { HARDIRQ-ON-W at: lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 xfrm_alloc_spi+0xc0/0xe60 xfrm_alloc_userspi+0x5f6/0xbc0 xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x493/0x880 netlink_rcv_skb+0x12e/0x380 xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x6d/0x90 netlink_unicast+0x42f/0x740 netlink_sendmsg+0x745/0xbe0 __sock_sendmsg+0xc5/0x190 __sys_sendto+0x1fe/0x2c0 __x64_sys_sendto+0xdc/0x1b0 do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 IN-SOFTIRQ-W at: lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 xfrm_timer_handler+0x91/0xd70 __hrtimer_run_queues+0x1dd/0xa60 hrtimer_run_softirq+0x146/0x2e0 handle_softirqs+0x266/0x860 irq_exit_rcu+0x115/0x1a0 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6e/0x90 asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x16/0x20 default_idle+0x13/0x20 default_idle_call+0x67/0xa0 do_idle+0x2da/0x320 cpu_startup_entry+0x50/0x60 start_secondary+0x213/0x2a0 common_startup_64+0x129/0x138 INITIAL USE at: lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 xfrm_alloc_spi+0xc0/0xe60 xfrm_alloc_userspi+0x5f6/0xbc0 xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x493/0x880 netlink_rcv_skb+0x12e/0x380 xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x6d/0x90 netlink_unicast+0x42f/0x740 netlink_sendmsg+0x745/0xbe0 __sock_sendmsg+0xc5/0x190 __sys_sendto+0x1fe/0x2c0 __x64_sys_sendto+0xdc/0x1b0 do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 } ... key at: [<ffffffff87f9cd20>] __key.18+0x0/0x40 the dependencies between the lock to be acquired and SOFTIRQ-irq-unsafe lock: -> (&xa->xa_lock#24){+.+.}-{3:3} ops: 9 { HARDIRQ-ON-W at: lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 mlx5e_xfrm_add_state+0xc5b/0x2290 [mlx5_core] xfrm_dev_state_add+0x3bb/0xd70 xfrm_add_sa+0x2451/0x4a90 xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x493/0x880 netlink_rcv_skb+0x12e/0x380 xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x6d/0x90 netlink_unicast+0x42f/0x740 netlink_sendmsg+0x745/0xbe0 __sock_sendmsg+0xc5/0x190 __sys_sendto+0x1fe/0x2c0 __x64_sys_sendto+0xdc/0x1b0 do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 SOFTIRQ-ON-W at: lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 _raw_spin_lock+0x2c/0x40 xa_set_mark+0x70/0x110 mlx5e_xfrm_add_state+0xe48/0x2290 [mlx5_core] xfrm_dev_state_add+0x3bb/0xd70 xfrm_add_sa+0x2451/0x4a90 xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x493/0x880 netlink_rcv_skb+0x12e/0x380 xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x6d/0x90 netlink_unicast+0x42f/0x740 netlink_sendmsg+0x745/0xbe0 __sock_sendmsg+0xc5/0x190 __sys_sendto+0x1fe/0x2c0 __x64_sys_sendto+0xdc/0x1b0 do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 INITIAL USE at: lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 mlx5e_xfrm_add_state+0xc5b/0x2290 [mlx5_core] xfrm_dev_state_add+0x3bb/0xd70 xfrm_add_sa+0x2451/0x4a90 xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x493/0x880 netlink_rcv_skb+0x12e/0x380 xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x6d/0x90 netlink_unicast+0x42f/0x740 netlink_sendmsg+0x745/0xbe0 __sock_sendmsg+0xc5/0x190 __sys_sendto+0x1fe/0x2c0 __x64_sys_sendto+0xdc/0x1b0 do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 } ... key at: [<ffffffffa078ff60>] __key.48+0x0/0xfffffffffff210a0 [mlx5_core] ... acquired at: __lock_acquire+0x30a0/0x5040 lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 mlx5e_xfrm_del_state+0xca/0x1e0 [mlx5_core] xfrm_dev_state_delete+0x90/0x160 __xfrm_state_delete+0x662/0xae0 xfrm_state_delete+0x1e/0x30 xfrm_del_sa+0x1c2/0x340 xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x493/0x880 netlink_rcv_skb+0x12e/0x380 xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x6d/0x90 netlink_unicast+0x42f/0x740 netlink_sendmsg+0x745/0xbe0 __sock_sendmsg+0xc5/0x190 __sys_sendto+0x1fe/0x2c0 __x64_sys_sendto+0xdc/0x1b0 do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 stack backtrace: CPU: 7 UID: 0 PID: 1337 Comm: charon Not tainted 6.12.0+ kernel-patches#4 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x74/0xd0 check_irq_usage+0x12e8/0x1d90 ? print_shortest_lock_dependencies_backwards+0x1b0/0x1b0 ? check_chain_key+0x1bb/0x4c0 ? __lockdep_reset_lock+0x180/0x180 ? check_path.constprop.0+0x24/0x50 ? mark_lock+0x108/0x2fb0 ? print_circular_bug+0x9b0/0x9b0 ? mark_lock+0x108/0x2fb0 ? print_usage_bug.part.0+0x670/0x670 ? check_prev_add+0x1c4/0x2310 check_prev_add+0x1c4/0x2310 __lock_acquire+0x30a0/0x5040 ? lockdep_set_lock_cmp_fn+0x190/0x190 ? lockdep_set_lock_cmp_fn+0x190/0x190 lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 ? mlx5e_xfrm_del_state+0xca/0x1e0 [mlx5_core] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x400/0x400 ? __xfrm_state_delete+0x5f0/0xae0 ? lock_downgrade+0x6b0/0x6b0 _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 ? mlx5e_xfrm_del_state+0xca/0x1e0 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_xfrm_del_state+0xca/0x1e0 [mlx5_core] xfrm_dev_state_delete+0x90/0x160 __xfrm_state_delete+0x662/0xae0 xfrm_state_delete+0x1e/0x30 xfrm_del_sa+0x1c2/0x340 ? xfrm_get_sa+0x250/0x250 ? check_chain_key+0x1bb/0x4c0 xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x493/0x880 ? copy_sec_ctx+0x270/0x270 ? check_chain_key+0x1bb/0x4c0 ? lockdep_set_lock_cmp_fn+0x190/0x190 ? lockdep_set_lock_cmp_fn+0x190/0x190 netlink_rcv_skb+0x12e/0x380 ? copy_sec_ctx+0x270/0x270 ? netlink_ack+0xd90/0xd90 ? netlink_deliver_tap+0xcd/0xb60 xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x6d/0x90 netlink_unicast+0x42f/0x740 ? netlink_attachskb+0x730/0x730 ? lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 netlink_sendmsg+0x745/0xbe0 ? netlink_unicast+0x740/0x740 ? __might_fault+0xbb/0x170 ? netlink_unicast+0x740/0x740 __sock_sendmsg+0xc5/0x190 ? fdget+0x163/0x1d0 __sys_sendto+0x1fe/0x2c0 ? __x64_sys_getpeername+0xb0/0xb0 ? do_user_addr_fault+0x856/0xe30 ? lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 ? __task_pid_nr_ns+0x117/0x410 ? lock_downgrade+0x6b0/0x6b0 __x64_sys_sendto+0xdc/0x1b0 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x284/0x400 do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 RIP: 0033:0x7f7d31291ba4 Code: 7d e8 89 4d d4 e8 4c 42 f7 ff 44 8b 4d d0 4c 8b 45 c8 89 c3 44 8b 55 d4 8b 7d e8 b8 2c 00 00 00 48 8b 55 d8 48 8b 75 e0 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 34 89 df 48 89 45 e8 e8 99 42 f7 ff 48 8b 45 RSP: 002b:00007f7d2ccd94f0 EFLAGS: 00000297 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 00007f7d31291ba4 RDX: 0000000000000028 RSI: 00007f7d2ccd96a0 RDI: 000000000000000a RBP: 00007f7d2ccd9530 R08: 00007f7d2ccd9598 R09: 000000000000000c R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000297 R12: 0000000000000028 R13: 00007f7d2ccd9598 R14: 00007f7d2ccd96a0 R15: 00000000000000e1 </TASK> Fixes: 4c24272 ("net/mlx5e: Listen to ARP events to update IPsec L2 headers in tunnel mode") Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>

Petr Machata says: ==================== mlxsw: Move Tx header handling to PCI driver Amit Cohen writes: Tx header should be added to all packets transmitted from the CPU to Spectrum ASICs. Historically, handling this header was added as a driver function, as Tx header is different between Spectrum and Switch-X. From May 2021, there is no support for SwitchX-2 ASIC, and all the relevant code was removed. For now, there is no justification to handle Tx header as part of spectrum.c, we can handle this as part of PCI, in skb_transmit(). This change will also be useful when XDP support will be added to mlxsw, as for XDP_TX and XDP_REDIRECT actions, Tx header should be added before transmitting the packet. Patch set overview: Patches kernel-patches#1-kernel-patches#2 add structure to store Tx header info and initialize it Patch kernel-patches#3 moves definitions of Tx header fields to txheader.h Patch kernel-patches#4 moves Tx header handling to PCI driver Patch kernel-patches#5 removes unnecessary attribute ==================== Link: https://patch.msgid.link/cover.1737044384.git.petrm@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

Hou Tao says: ==================== The patch set continues the previous work [1] to move all the freeings of htab elements out of bucket lock. One motivation for the patch set is the locking problem reported by Sebastian [2]: the freeing of bpf_timer under PREEMPT_RT may acquire a spin-lock (namely softirq_expiry_lock). However the freeing procedure for htab element has already held a raw-spin-lock (namely bucket lock), and it will trigger the warning: "BUG: scheduling while atomic" as demonstrated by the selftests patch. Another motivation is to reduce the locked scope of bucket lock. However, the patch set doesn't move all freeing of htab element out of bucket lock, it still keep the free of special fields in pre-allocated hash map under the protect of bucket lock in htab_map_update_elem(). The patch set is structured as follows: * Patch #1 moves the element freeing out of bucket lock for htab_lru_map_delete_node(). However the freeing is still in the locked scope of LRU raw spin lock. * Patch #2~#3 move the element freeing out of bucket lock for __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_elem() * Patch #4 cancels the bpf_timer in two steps to fix the locking problem in htab_map_update_elem() for PREEMPT_PRT. * Patch #5 adds a selftest for the locking problem Please see individual patches for more details. Comments are always welcome. --- v3: * patch #1: update the commit message to state that the freeing of special field is still in the locked scope of LRU raw spin lock * patch #4: cancel the bpf_timer in two steps only for PREEMPT_RT (suggested by Alexei) v2: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250109061901.2620825-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com * cancels the bpf timer in two steps instead of breaking the reuse the refill of per-cpu ->extra_elems into two steps v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250107085559.3081563-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241106063542.357743-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241106084527.4gPrMnHt@linutronix.de ==================== Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250117101816.2101857-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

irq_chip functions may be called in raw spinlock context. Therefore, we must also use a raw spinlock for our own internal locking. This fixes the following lockdep splat: [ 5.349336] ============================= [ 5.353349] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 5.357361] 6.13.0-rc5+ #69 Tainted: G W [ 5.363031] ----------------------------- [ 5.367045] kworker/u17:1/44 is trying to lock: [ 5.371587] ffffff88018b02c0 (&chip->gpio_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: xgpio_irq_unmask (drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c:433 (discriminator 8)) [ 5.380079] other info that might help us debug this: [ 5.385138] context-{5:5} [ 5.387762] 5 locks held by kworker/u17:1/44: [ 5.392123] #0: ffffff8800014958 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work (kernel/workqueue.c:3204) [ 5.402260] #1: ffffffc082fcbdd8 (deferred_probe_work){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work (kernel/workqueue.c:3205) [ 5.411528] #2: ffffff880172c900 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_attach (drivers/base/dd.c:1006) [ 5.419929] #3: ffffff88039c8268 (request_class#2){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __setup_irq (kernel/irq/internals.h:156 kernel/irq/manage.c:1596) [ 5.428331] #4: ffffff88039c80c8 (lock_class#2){....}-{2:2}, at: __setup_irq (kernel/irq/manage.c:1614) [ 5.436472] stack backtrace: [ 5.439359] CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 44 Comm: kworker/u17:1 Tainted: G W 6.13.0-rc5+ #69 [ 5.448690] Tainted: [W]=WARN [ 5.451656] Hardware name: xlnx,zynqmp (DT) [ 5.455845] Workqueue: events_unbound deferred_probe_work_func [ 5.461699] Call trace: [ 5.464147] show_stack+0x18/0x24 C [ 5.467821] dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:123) [ 5.471501] dump_stack (lib/dump_stack.c:130) [ 5.474824] __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4828 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4898 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5176) [ 5.478758] lock_acquire (arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h:40 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:467 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5851 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5814) [ 5.482429] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave (include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:111 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162) [ 5.486797] xgpio_irq_unmask (drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c:433 (discriminator 8)) [ 5.490737] irq_enable (kernel/irq/internals.h:236 kernel/irq/chip.c:170 kernel/irq/chip.c:439 kernel/irq/chip.c:432 kernel/irq/chip.c:345) [ 5.494060] __irq_startup (kernel/irq/internals.h:241 kernel/irq/chip.c:180 kernel/irq/chip.c:250) [ 5.497645] irq_startup (kernel/irq/chip.c:270) [ 5.501143] __setup_irq (kernel/irq/manage.c:1807) [ 5.504728] request_threaded_irq (kernel/irq/manage.c:2208) Fixes: a32c7ca ("gpio: gpio-xilinx: Add interrupt support") Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@linux.dev> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250110163354.2012654-1-sean.anderson@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>

This commit addresses a circular locking dependency issue within the GFX isolation mechanism. The problem was identified by a warning indicating a potential deadlock due to inconsistent lock acquisition order. - The `amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use` and `amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_end_use` functions previously acquired `enforce_isolation_mutex` and called `amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl`, leading to potential deadlocks. ie., If `amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl` is called while `enforce_isolation_mutex` is held, and `amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_handler` is called while `kfd_sch_mutex` is held, it can create a circular dependency. By ensuring consistent lock usage, this fix resolves the issue: [ 606.297333] ====================================================== [ 606.297343] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 606.297353] 6.10.0-amd-mlkd-610-311224-lof #19 Tainted: G OE [ 606.297365] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 606.297375] kworker/u96:3/3825 is trying to acquire lock: [ 606.297385] ffff9aa64e431cb8 ((work_completion)(&(&adev->gfx.enforce_isolation[i].work)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x232/0x610 [ 606.297413] but task is already holding lock: [ 606.297423] ffff9aa64e432338 (&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x51/0x4d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.297725] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 606.297738] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 606.297749] -> #2 (&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 606.297765] __mutex_lock+0x85/0x930 [ 606.297776] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 [ 606.297786] amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x51/0x4d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.298007] amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use+0x2a4/0x5d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.298225] amdgpu_ring_alloc+0x48/0x70 [amdgpu] [ 606.298412] amdgpu_ib_schedule+0x176/0x8a0 [amdgpu] [ 606.298603] amdgpu_job_run+0xac/0x1e0 [amdgpu] [ 606.298866] drm_sched_run_job_work+0x24f/0x430 [gpu_sched] [ 606.298880] process_one_work+0x21e/0x680 [ 606.298890] worker_thread+0x190/0x350 [ 606.298899] kthread+0xe7/0x120 [ 606.298908] ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60 [ 606.298919] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 606.298929] -> #1 (&adev->enforce_isolation_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 606.298947] __mutex_lock+0x85/0x930 [ 606.298956] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 [ 606.298966] amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_handler+0x87/0x370 [amdgpu] [ 606.299190] process_one_work+0x21e/0x680 [ 606.299199] worker_thread+0x190/0x350 [ 606.299208] kthread+0xe7/0x120 [ 606.299217] ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60 [ 606.299227] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 606.299236] -> #0 ((work_completion)(&(&adev->gfx.enforce_isolation[i].work)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: [ 606.299257] __lock_acquire+0x16f9/0x2810 [ 606.299267] lock_acquire+0xd1/0x300 [ 606.299276] __flush_work+0x250/0x610 [ 606.299286] cancel_delayed_work_sync+0x71/0x80 [ 606.299296] amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x287/0x4d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.299509] amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use+0x2a4/0x5d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.299723] amdgpu_ring_alloc+0x48/0x70 [amdgpu] [ 606.299909] amdgpu_ib_schedule+0x176/0x8a0 [amdgpu] [ 606.300101] amdgpu_job_run+0xac/0x1e0 [amdgpu] [ 606.300355] drm_sched_run_job_work+0x24f/0x430 [gpu_sched] [ 606.300369] process_one_work+0x21e/0x680 [ 606.300378] worker_thread+0x190/0x350 [ 606.300387] kthread+0xe7/0x120 [ 606.300396] ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60 [ 606.300406] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 606.300416] other info that might help us debug this: [ 606.300428] Chain exists of: (work_completion)(&(&adev->gfx.enforce_isolation[i].work)->work) --> &adev->enforce_isolation_mutex --> &adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex [ 606.300458] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 606.300468] CPU0 CPU1 [ 606.300476] ---- ---- [ 606.300484] lock(&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex); [ 606.300494] lock(&adev->enforce_isolation_mutex); [ 606.300508] lock(&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex); [ 606.300521] lock((work_completion)(&(&adev->gfx.enforce_isolation[i].work)->work)); [ 606.300536] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 606.300546] 5 locks held by kworker/u96:3/3825: [ 606.300555] #0: ffff9aa5aa1f5d58 ((wq_completion)comp_1.1.0){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x3f5/0x680 [ 606.300577] #1: ffffaa53c3c97e40 ((work_completion)(&sched->work_run_job)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1d6/0x680 [ 606.300600] #2: ffff9aa64e463c98 (&adev->enforce_isolation_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use+0x1c3/0x5d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.300837] #3: ffff9aa64e432338 (&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x51/0x4d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.301062] #4: ffffffff8c1a5660 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __flush_work+0x70/0x610 [ 606.301083] stack backtrace: [ 606.301092] CPU: 14 PID: 3825 Comm: kworker/u96:3 Tainted: G OE 6.10.0-amd-mlkd-610-311224-lof #19 [ 606.301109] Hardware name: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. X570S GAMING X/X570S GAMING X, BIOS F7 03/22/2024 [ 606.301124] Workqueue: comp_1.1.0 drm_sched_run_job_work [gpu_sched] [ 606.301140] Call Trace: [ 606.301146] <TASK> [ 606.301154] dump_stack_lvl+0x9b/0xf0 [ 606.301166] dump_stack+0x10/0x20 [ 606.301175] print_circular_bug+0x26c/0x340 [ 606.301187] check_noncircular+0x157/0x170 [ 606.301197] ? register_lock_class+0x48/0x490 [ 606.301213] __lock_acquire+0x16f9/0x2810 [ 606.301230] lock_acquire+0xd1/0x300 [ 606.301239] ? __flush_work+0x232/0x610 [ 606.301250] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 606.301261] ? mark_held_locks+0x54/0x90 [ 606.301274] ? __flush_work+0x232/0x610 [ 606.301284] __flush_work+0x250/0x610 [ 606.301293] ? __flush_work+0x232/0x610 [ 606.301305] ? __pfx_wq_barrier_func+0x10/0x10 [ 606.301318] ? mark_held_locks+0x54/0x90 [ 606.301331] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 606.301345] cancel_delayed_work_sync+0x71/0x80 [ 606.301356] amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x287/0x4d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.301661] amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use+0x2a4/0x5d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.302050] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 606.302069] amdgpu_ring_alloc+0x48/0x70 [amdgpu] [ 606.302452] amdgpu_ib_schedule+0x176/0x8a0 [amdgpu] [ 606.302862] ? drm_sched_entity_error+0x82/0x190 [gpu_sched] [ 606.302890] amdgpu_job_run+0xac/0x1e0 [amdgpu] [ 606.303366] drm_sched_run_job_work+0x24f/0x430 [gpu_sched] [ 606.303388] process_one_work+0x21e/0x680 [ 606.303409] worker_thread+0x190/0x350 [ 606.303424] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 [ 606.303437] kthread+0xe7/0x120 [ 606.303449] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [ 606.303463] ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60 [ 606.303476] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [ 606.303489] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 606.303512] </TASK> v2: Refactor lock handling to resolve circular dependency (Alex) - Introduced a `sched_work` flag to defer the call to `amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl` until after releasing `enforce_isolation_mutex`. - This change ensures that `amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl` is called outside the critical section, preventing the circular dependency and deadlock. - The `sched_work` flag is set within the mutex-protected section if conditions are met, and the actual function call is made afterward. - This approach ensures consistent lock acquisition order. Fixes: afefd6f ("drm/amdgpu: Implement Enforce Isolation Handler for KGD/KFD serialization") Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Srinivasan Shanmugam <srinivasan.shanmugam@amd.com> Suggested-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> (cherry picked from commit 0b6b2dd) Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

BPF CI testing report a UAF issue: [ 16.446633] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 000000000000003 0 [ 16.447134] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mod e [ 16.447516] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present pag e [ 16.447878] PGD 0 P4D 0 [ 16.448063] Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPT I [ 16.448409] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 9 Comm: kworker/0:1 Tainted: G OE 6.13.0-rc3-g89e8a75fda73-dirty #4 2 [ 16.449124] Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODUL E [ 16.449502] Hardware name: QEMU Ubuntu 24.04 PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/201 4 [ 16.450201] Workqueue: smc_hs_wq smc_listen_wor k [ 16.450531] RIP: 0010:smc_listen_work+0xc02/0x159 0 [ 16.452158] RSP: 0018:ffffb5ab40053d98 EFLAGS: 0001024 6 [ 16.452526] RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: 000000000000030 0 [ 16.452994] RDX: 0000000000000280 RSI: 00003513840053f0 RDI: 000000000000000 0 [ 16.453492] RBP: ffffa097808e3800 R08: ffffa09782dba1e0 R09: 000000000000000 5 [ 16.453987] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffa0978274640 0 [ 16.454497] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffffa09782d4092 0 [ 16.454996] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffa097bbc00000(0000) knlGS:000000000000000 0 [ 16.455557] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003 3 [ 16.455961] CR2: 0000000000000030 CR3: 0000000102788004 CR4: 0000000000770ef 0 [ 16.456459] PKRU: 5555555 4 [ 16.456654] Call Trace : [ 16.456832] <TASK > [ 16.456989] ? __die+0x23/0x7 0 [ 16.457215] ? page_fault_oops+0x180/0x4c 0 [ 16.457508] ? __lock_acquire+0x3e6/0x249 0 [ 16.457801] ? exc_page_fault+0x68/0x20 0 [ 16.458080] ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x3 0 [ 16.458389] ? smc_listen_work+0xc02/0x159 0 [ 16.458689] ? smc_listen_work+0xc02/0x159 0 [ 16.458987] ? lock_is_held_type+0x8f/0x10 0 [ 16.459284] process_one_work+0x1ea/0x6d 0 [ 16.459570] worker_thread+0x1c3/0x38 0 [ 16.459839] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x1 0 [ 16.460144] kthread+0xe0/0x11 0 [ 16.460372] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x1 0 [ 16.460640] ret_from_fork+0x31/0x5 0 [ 16.460896] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x1 0 [ 16.461166] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x3 0 [ 16.461453] </TASK > [ 16.461616] Modules linked in: bpf_testmod(OE) [last unloaded: bpf_testmod(OE) ] [ 16.462134] CR2: 000000000000003 0 [ 16.462380] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- [ 16.462710] RIP: 0010:smc_listen_work+0xc02/0x1590 The direct cause of this issue is that after smc_listen_out_connected(), newclcsock->sk may be NULL since it will releases the smcsk. Therefore, if the application closes the socket immediately after accept, newclcsock->sk can be NULL. A possible execution order could be as follows: smc_listen_work | userspace ----------------------------------------------------------------- lock_sock(sk) | smc_listen_out_connected() | | \- smc_listen_out | | | \- release_sock | | |- sk->sk_data_ready() | | fd = accept(); | close(fd); | \- socket->sk = NULL; /* newclcsock->sk is NULL now */ SMC_STAT_SERV_SUCC_INC(sock_net(newclcsock->sk)) Since smc_listen_out_connected() will not fail, simply swapping the order of the code can easily fix this issue. Fixes: 3b2dec2 ("net/smc: restructure client and server code in af_smc") Signed-off-by: D. Wythe <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com>

…uctions Add several ./test_progs tests: - atomics/load_acquire - atomics/store_release - arena_atomics/load_acquire - arena_atomics/store_release - verifier_load_acquire/* - verifier_store_release/* - verifier_precision/bpf_load_acquire - verifier_precision/bpf_store_release The last two tests are added to check if backtrack_insn() handles the new instructions correctly. Additionally, the last test also makes sure that the verifier "remembers" the value (in src_reg) we store-release into e.g. a stack slot. For example, if we take a look at the test program: #0: "r1 = 8;" #1: "store_release((u64 *)(r10 - 8), r1);" #2: "r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 8);" #3: "r2 = r10;" #4: "r2 += r1;" /* mark_precise */ #5: "r0 = 0;" #6: "exit;" At #1, if the verifier doesn't remember that we wrote 8 to the stack, then later at #4 we would be adding an unbounded scalar value to the stack pointer, which would cause the program to be rejected: VERIFIER LOG: ============= ... math between fp pointer and register with unbounded min value is not allowed All new tests depend on the pre-defined __BPF_FEATURE_LOAD_ACQ_STORE_REL feature macro, which implies -mcpu>=v4. Signed-off-by: Peilin Ye <yepeilin@google.com>

libtraceevent parses and returns an array of argument fields, sometimes larger than RAW_SYSCALL_ARGS_NUM (6) because it includes "__syscall_nr", idx will traverse to index 6 (7th element) whereas sc->fmt->arg holds 6 elements max, creating an out-of-bounds access. This runtime error is found by UBsan. The error message: $ sudo UBSAN_OPTIONS=print_stacktrace=1 ./perf trace -a --max-events=1 builtin-trace.c:1966:35: runtime error: index 6 out of bounds for type 'syscall_arg_fmt [6]' #0 0x5c04956be5fe in syscall__alloc_arg_fmts /home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c:1966 #1 0x5c04956c0510 in trace__read_syscall_info /home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c:2110 #2 0x5c04956c372b in trace__syscall_info /home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c:2436 #3 0x5c04956d2f39 in trace__init_syscalls_bpf_prog_array_maps /home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c:3897 #4 0x5c04956d6d25 in trace__run /home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c:4335 #5 0x5c04956e112e in cmd_trace /home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c:5502 #6 0x5c04956eda7d in run_builtin /home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/perf.c:351 #7 0x5c04956ee0a8 in handle_internal_command /home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/perf.c:404 #8 0x5c04956ee37f in run_argv /home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/perf.c:448 #9 0x5c04956ee8e9 in main /home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/perf.c:556 #10 0x79eb3622a3b7 in __libc_start_call_main ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58 #11 0x79eb3622a47a in __libc_start_main_impl ../csu/libc-start.c:360 #12 0x5c04955422d4 in _start (/home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/perf+0x4e02d4) (BuildId: 5b6cab2d59e96a4341741765ad6914a4d784dbc6) 0.000 ( 0.014 ms): Chrome_ChildIO/117244 write(fd: 238, buf: !, count: 1) = 1 Fixes: 5e58fcf ("perf trace: Allow allocating sc->arg_fmt even without the syscall tracepoint") Signed-off-by: Howard Chu <howardchu95@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250122025519.361873-1-howardchu95@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>

This fixes the following hard lockup in isolate_lru_folios() during memory reclaim. If the LRU mostly contains ineligible folios this may trigger watchdog. watchdog: Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 173 RIP: 0010:native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x255/0x2a0 Call Trace: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x31/0x40 folio_lruvec_lock_irqsave+0x5f/0x90 folio_batch_move_lru+0x91/0x150 lru_add_drain_per_cpu+0x1c/0x40 process_one_work+0x17d/0x350 worker_thread+0x27b/0x3a0 kthread+0xe8/0x120 ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 lruvec->lru_lock owner： PID: 2865 TASK: ffff888139214d40 CPU: 40 COMMAND: "kswapd0" #0 [fffffe0000945e60] crash_nmi_callback at ffffffffa567a555 #1 [fffffe0000945e68] nmi_handle at ffffffffa563b171 #2 [fffffe0000945eb0] default_do_nmi at ffffffffa6575920 #3 [fffffe0000945ed0] exc_nmi at ffffffffa6575af4 #4 [fffffe0000945ef0] end_repeat_nmi at ffffffffa6601dde [exception RIP: isolate_lru_folios+403] RIP: ffffffffa597df53 RSP: ffffc90006fb7c28 RFLAGS: 00000002 RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: ffffc90006fb7c60 RCX: ffffea04a2196f88 RDX: ffffc90006fb7c60 RSI: ffffc90006fb7c60 RDI: ffffea04a2197048 RBP: ffff88812cbd3010 R8: ffffea04a2197008 R9: 0000000000000001 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffffea04a2197008 R13: ffffea04a2197048 R14: ffffc90006fb7de8 R15: 0000000003e3e937 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018 <NMI exception stack> #5 [ffffc90006fb7c28] isolate_lru_folios at ffffffffa597df53 #6 [ffffc90006fb7cf8] shrink_active_list at ffffffffa597f788 #7 [ffffc90006fb7da8] balance_pgdat at ffffffffa5986db0 #8 [ffffc90006fb7ec0] kswapd at ffffffffa5987354 #9 [ffffc90006fb7ef8] kthread at ffffffffa5748238 crash> Scenario: User processe are requesting a large amount of memory and keep page active. Then a module continuously requests memory from ZONE_DMA32 area. Memory reclaim will be triggered due to ZONE_DMA32 watermark alarm reached. However pages in the LRU(active_anon) list are mostly from the ZONE_NORMAL area. Reproduce: Terminal 1: Construct to continuously increase pages active(anon). mkdir /tmp/memory mount -t tmpfs -o size=1024000M tmpfs /tmp/memory dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/memory/block bs=4M tail /tmp/memory/block Terminal 2: vmstat -a 1 active will increase. procs ---memory--- ---swap-- ---io---- -system-- ---cpu--- ... r b swpd free inact active si so bi bo 1 0 0 1445623076 45898836 83646008 0 0 0 1 0 0 1445623076 43450228 86094616 0 0 0 1 0 0 1445623076 41003480 88541364 0 0 0 1 0 0 1445623076 38557088 90987756 0 0 0 1 0 0 1445623076 36109688 93435156 0 0 0 1 0 0 1445619552 33663256 95881632 0 0 0 1 0 0 1445619804 31217140 98327792 0 0 0 1 0 0 1445619804 28769988 100774944 0 0 0 1 0 0 1445619804 26322348 103222584 0 0 0 1 0 0 1445619804 23875592 105669340 0 0 0 cat /proc/meminfo | head Active(anon) increase. MemTotal: 1579941036 kB MemFree: 1445618500 kB MemAvailable: 1453013224 kB Buffers: 6516 kB Cached: 128653956 kB SwapCached: 0 kB Active: 118110812 kB Inactive: 11436620 kB Active(anon): 115345744 kB Inactive(anon): 945292 kB When the Active(anon) is 115345744 kB, insmod module triggers the ZONE_DMA32 watermark. perf record -e vmscan:mm_vmscan_lru_isolate -aR perf script isolate_mode=0 classzone=1 order=1 nr_requested=32 nr_scanned=2 nr_skipped=2 nr_taken=0 lru=active_anon isolate_mode=0 classzone=1 order=1 nr_requested=32 nr_scanned=0 nr_skipped=0 nr_taken=0 lru=active_anon isolate_mode=0 classzone=1 order=0 nr_requested=32 nr_scanned=28835844 nr_skipped=28835844 nr_taken=0 lru=active_anon isolate_mode=0 classzone=1 order=1 nr_requested=32 nr_scanned=28835844 nr_skipped=28835844 nr_taken=0 lru=active_anon isolate_mode=0 classzone=1 order=0 nr_requested=32 nr_scanned=29 nr_skipped=29 nr_taken=0 lru=active_anon isolate_mode=0 classzone=1 order=0 nr_requested=32 nr_scanned=0 nr_skipped=0 nr_taken=0 lru=active_anon See nr_scanned=28835844. 28835844 * 4k = 115343376KB approximately equal to 115345744 kB. If increase Active(anon) to 1000G then insmod module triggers the ZONE_DMA32 watermark. hard lockup will occur. In my device nr_scanned = 0000000003e3e937 when hard lockup. Convert to memory size 0x0000000003e3e937 * 4KB = 261072092 KB. [ffffc90006fb7c28] isolate_lru_folios at ffffffffa597df53 ffffc90006fb7c30: 0000000000000020 0000000000000000 ffffc90006fb7c40: ffffc90006fb7d40 ffff88812cbd3000 ffffc90006fb7c50: ffffc90006fb7d30 0000000106fb7de8 ffffc90006fb7c60: ffffea04a2197008 ffffea0006ed4a48 ffffc90006fb7c70: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffffc90006fb7c80: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffffc90006fb7c90: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffffc90006fb7ca0: 0000000000000000 0000000003e3e937 ffffc90006fb7cb0: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffffc90006fb7cc0: 8d7c0b56b7874b00 ffff88812cbd3000 About the Fixes: Why did it take eight years to be discovered? The problem requires the following conditions to occur: 1. The device memory should be large enough. 2. Pages in the LRU(active_anon) list are mostly from the ZONE_NORMAL area. 3. The memory in ZONE_DMA32 needs to reach the watermark. If the memory is not large enough, or if the usage design of ZONE_DMA32 area memory is reasonable, this problem is difficult to detect. notes: The problem is most likely to occur in ZONE_DMA32 and ZONE_NORMAL, but other suitable scenarios may also trigger the problem. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241119060842.274072-1-liuye@kylinos.cn Fixes: b2e1875 ("mm, vmscan: begin reclaiming pages on a per-node basis") Signed-off-by: liuye <liuye@kylinos.cn> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Yang Shi <yang@os.amperecomputing.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>

…uctions Add several ./test_progs tests: - atomics/load_acquire - atomics/store_release - arena_atomics/load_acquire - arena_atomics/store_release - verifier_load_acquire/* - verifier_store_release/* - verifier_precision/bpf_load_acquire - verifier_precision/bpf_store_release The last two tests are added to check if backtrack_insn() handles the new instructions correctly. Additionally, the last test also makes sure that the verifier "remembers" the value (in src_reg) we store-release into e.g. a stack slot. For example, if we take a look at the test program: #0: "r1 = 8;" #1: "store_release((u64 *)(r10 - 8), r1);" #2: "r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 8);" #3: "r2 = r10;" #4: "r2 += r1;" /* mark_precise */ #5: "r0 = 0;" #6: "exit;" At #1, if the verifier doesn't remember that we wrote 8 to the stack, then later at #4 we would be adding an unbounded scalar value to the stack pointer, which would cause the program to be rejected: VERIFIER LOG: ============= ... math between fp pointer and register with unbounded min value is not allowed All new tests depend on the pre-defined __BPF_FEATURE_LOAD_ACQ_STORE_REL feature macro, which implies -mcpu>=v4. Signed-off-by: Peilin Ye <yepeilin@google.com>

When COWing a relocation tree path, at relocation.c:replace_path(), we can trigger a lockdep splat while we are in the btrfs_search_slot() call against the relocation root. This happens in that callchain at ctree.c:read_block_for_search() when we happen to find a child extent buffer already loaded through the fs tree with a lockdep class set to the fs tree. So when we attempt to lock that extent buffer through a relocation tree we have to reset the lockdep class to the class for a relocation tree, since a relocation tree has extent buffers that used to belong to a fs tree and may currently be already loaded (we swap extent buffers between the two trees at the end of replace_path()). However we are missing calls to btrfs_maybe_reset_lockdep_class() to reset the lockdep class at ctree.c:read_block_for_search() before we read lock an extent buffer, just like we did for btrfs_search_slot() in commit b40130b ("btrfs: fix lockdep splat with reloc root extent buffers"). So add the missing btrfs_maybe_reset_lockdep_class() calls before the attempts to read lock an extent buffer at ctree.c:read_block_for_search(). The lockdep splat was reported by syzbot and it looks like this: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.13.0-rc5-syzkaller-00163-gab75170520d4 #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz.0.0/5335 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8880545dbc38 (btrfs-tree-01){++++}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_tree_read_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:146 but task is already holding lock: ffff8880545dba58 (btrfs-treloc-02/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_tree_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:189 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> kernel-patches#2 (btrfs-treloc-02/1){+.+.}-{4:4}: reacquire_held_locks+0x3eb/0x690 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5374 __lock_release kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5563 [inline] lock_release+0x396/0xa30 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5870 up_write+0x79/0x590 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1629 btrfs_force_cow_block+0x14b3/0x1fd0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:660 btrfs_cow_block+0x371/0x830 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:755 btrfs_search_slot+0xc01/0x3180 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2153 replace_path+0x1243/0x2740 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1224 merge_reloc_root+0xc46/0x1ad0 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1692 merge_reloc_roots+0x3b3/0x980 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1942 relocate_block_group+0xb0a/0xd40 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3754 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x77d/0xd90 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4087 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x12c/0x3b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3494 __btrfs_balance+0x1b0f/0x26b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4278 btrfs_balance+0xbdc/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4655 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x493/0x7c0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3670 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xf5/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:892 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f -> kernel-patches#1 (btrfs-tree-01/1){+.+.}-{4:4}: lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849 down_write_nested+0xa2/0x220 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1693 btrfs_tree_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:189 btrfs_init_new_buffer fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5052 [inline] btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x41c/0x1440 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5132 btrfs_force_cow_block+0x526/0x1fd0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:573 btrfs_cow_block+0x371/0x830 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:755 btrfs_search_slot+0xc01/0x3180 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2153 btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x9c/0x1a0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:4351 btrfs_insert_empty_item fs/btrfs/ctree.h:688 [inline] btrfs_insert_inode_ref+0x2bb/0xf80 fs/btrfs/inode-item.c:330 btrfs_rename_exchange fs/btrfs/inode.c:7990 [inline] btrfs_rename2+0xcb7/0x2b90 fs/btrfs/inode.c:8374 vfs_rename+0xbdb/0xf00 fs/namei.c:5067 do_renameat2+0xd94/0x13f0 fs/namei.c:5224 __do_sys_renameat2 fs/namei.c:5258 [inline] __se_sys_renameat2 fs/namei.c:5255 [inline] __x64_sys_renameat2+0xce/0xe0 fs/namei.c:5255 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f -> #0 (btrfs-tree-01){++++}-{4:4}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline] validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904 __lock_acquire+0x1397/0x2100 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5226 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849 down_read_nested+0xb5/0xa50 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1649 btrfs_tree_read_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:146 btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.h:188 [inline] read_block_for_search+0x718/0xbb0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1610 btrfs_search_slot+0x1274/0x3180 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2237 replace_path+0x1243/0x2740 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1224 merge_reloc_root+0xc46/0x1ad0 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1692 merge_reloc_roots+0x3b3/0x980 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1942 relocate_block_group+0xb0a/0xd40 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3754 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x77d/0xd90 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4087 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x12c/0x3b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3494 __btrfs_balance+0x1b0f/0x26b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4278 btrfs_balance+0xbdc/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4655 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x493/0x7c0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3670 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xf5/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:892 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: btrfs-tree-01 --> btrfs-tree-01/1 --> btrfs-treloc-02/1 Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(btrfs-treloc-02/1); lock(btrfs-tree-01/1); lock(btrfs-treloc-02/1); rlock(btrfs-tree-01); *** DEADLOCK *** 8 locks held by syz.0.0/5335: #0: ffff88801e3ae420 (sb_writers#13){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write_file+0x5e/0x200 fs/namespace.c:559 kernel-patches#1: ffff888052c760d0 (&fs_info->reclaim_bgs_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __btrfs_balance+0x4c2/0x26b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4183 kernel-patches#2: ffff888052c74850 (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x775/0xd90 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4086 kernel-patches#3: ffff88801e3ae610 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: merge_reloc_root+0xf11/0x1ad0 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1659 kernel-patches#4: ffff888052c76470 (btrfs_trans_num_writers){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0x405/0xda0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:288 kernel-patches#5: ffff888052c76498 (btrfs_trans_num_extwriters){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0x405/0xda0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:288 kernel-patches#6: ffff8880545db878 (btrfs-tree-01/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_tree_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:189 kernel-patches#7: ffff8880545dba58 (btrfs-treloc-02/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_tree_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:189 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5335 Comm: syz.0.0 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc5-syzkaller-00163-gab75170520d4 #0 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_circular_bug+0x13a/0x1b0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2074 check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2206 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline] validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904 __lock_acquire+0x1397/0x2100 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5226 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849 down_read_nested+0xb5/0xa50 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1649 btrfs_tree_read_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:146 btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.h:188 [inline] read_block_for_search+0x718/0xbb0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1610 btrfs_search_slot+0x1274/0x3180 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2237 replace_path+0x1243/0x2740 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1224 merge_reloc_root+0xc46/0x1ad0 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1692 merge_reloc_roots+0x3b3/0x980 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1942 relocate_block_group+0xb0a/0xd40 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3754 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x77d/0xd90 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4087 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x12c/0x3b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3494 __btrfs_balance+0x1b0f/0x26b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4278 btrfs_balance+0xbdc/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4655 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x493/0x7c0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3670 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xf5/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:892 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f1ac6985d29 Code: ff ff c3 (...) RSP: 002b:00007f1ac63fe038 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f1ac6b76160 RCX: 00007f1ac6985d29 RDX: 0000000020000180 RSI: 00000000c4009420 RDI: 0000000000000007 RBP: 00007f1ac6a01b08 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 00007f1ac6b76160 R15: 00007fffda145a88 </TASK> Reported-by: syzbot+63913e558c084f7f8fdc@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/677b3014.050a0220.3b53b0.0064.GAE@google.com/ Fixes: 9978599 ("btrfs: reduce lock contention when eb cache miss for btree search") Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

…uctions Add several ./test_progs tests: - arena_atomics/load_acquire - arena_atomics/store_release - verifier_load_acquire/* - verifier_store_release/* - verifier_precision/bpf_load_acquire - verifier_precision/bpf_store_release The last two tests are added to check if backtrack_insn() handles the new instructions correctly. Additionally, the last test also makes sure that the verifier "remembers" the value (in src_reg) we store-release into e.g. a stack slot. For example, if we take a look at the test program: #0: r1 = 8; /* store_release((u64 *)(r10 - 8), r1); */ #1: .8byte %[store_release]; #2: r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 8); #3: r2 = r10; #4: r2 += r1; #5: r0 = 0; #6: exit; At #1, if the verifier doesn't remember that we wrote 8 to the stack, then later at #4 we would be adding an unbounded scalar value to the stack pointer, which would cause the program to be rejected: VERIFIER LOG: ============= ... math between fp pointer and register with unbounded min value is not allowed All new tests depend on #ifdef ENABLE_ATOMICS_TESTS. Currently they only run for arm64. Signed-off-by: Peilin Ye <yepeilin@google.com>

kernel-patches-bot added bpf-next new V1 labels Sep 4, 2020

tsipa force-pushed the series/199469 branch from f9f5af7 to 083d867 Compare September 6, 2020 02:08

tsipa force-pushed the series/199469 branch from 083d867 to 5146a76 Compare September 7, 2020 19:23

kernel-patches-bot force-pushed the series/199469 branch from 5146a76 to d2efae7 Compare September 9, 2020 03:34

kernel-patches-bot and others added 2 commits September 9, 2020 13:11

adding ci files

e105b83

kernel-patches-bot force-pushed the series/199469 branch from d2efae7 to 967160b Compare September 9, 2020 20:11

kernel-patches-bot added changes-requested and removed new labels Sep 10, 2020

kernel-patches-bot closed this Sep 10, 2020

kernel-patches-bot deleted the series/199469 branch September 15, 2020 17:49

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

bpf: don't check against device MTU in __bpf_skb_max_len #4

bpf: don't check against device MTU in __bpf_skb_max_len #4

kernel-patches-bot commented Sep 4, 2020

kernel-patches-bot commented Sep 4, 2020

kernel-patches-bot commented Sep 6, 2020

kernel-patches-bot commented Sep 7, 2020

kernel-patches-bot commented Sep 9, 2020

kernel-patches-bot commented Sep 9, 2020

kernel-patches-bot commented Sep 10, 2020

bpf: don't check against device MTU in __bpf_skb_max_len #4

bpf: don't check against device MTU in __bpf_skb_max_len #4

Conversation

kernel-patches-bot commented Sep 4, 2020

kernel-patches-bot commented Sep 4, 2020

kernel-patches-bot commented Sep 6, 2020

kernel-patches-bot commented Sep 7, 2020

kernel-patches-bot commented Sep 9, 2020

kernel-patches-bot commented Sep 9, 2020

kernel-patches-bot commented Sep 10, 2020