-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 242
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[DROOLS-4636] Update Scenario Cheatsheet to mention MVEL and Background #1277
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
b38fda3
[DROOLS-4636] Update Scenario Cheatsheet to mention MVEL and Background
danielezonca 5a7ad90
[DROOLS-4636] Minor
danielezonca c6c3de8
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into DROOLS-4636
danielezonca 34f103c
[DROOLS-4636] (cherrypick) Documented how to refer to actualValue par…
yesamer 6f3678c
[DROOLS-4636] Minor changes
danielezonca 6dc93f1
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into DROOLS-4636
danielezonca b24ca2b
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into DROOLS-4636
danielezonca 90e0498
[DROOLS-4636] Minor changes
danielezonca ccec49c
[DROOLS-4636] Minor changes
danielezonca File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are you sure that we shell mention all of the limitation for expressions?
Bcs we are obviosly do not mention that if you will /0 the expression will fall, why should we mention about the return type? Just my feeling of the cheat sheet idea. I would like to only mention a key words.
# specifies expression you can use to invoke Java code.
actualValue specifies parameter for assertion in EXPECT.
But if you have other ideas...
If you really want to leave it here a shorten version of it as well:
Return type of the expression in GIVEN section should be the same as type of the column.
Return type of the expression in EXPECT section should be boolean assertion result.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can remove the additional information but I think it could be useful to have them here. I cannot user your suggested version because in EXPECT expression can return the same type (and in this case it will be verified as
==
to the actualValue) or a boolean so I mentioned bothThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, what about using /expression? Coz we are no need to put # before the expression for those column.