[Blocked] Enhancement/inline footer 958 #1235
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…s for route based modal footer and modified all 3 pages to include an inlne footer. The 3 pages all have varying height
…rbydesign/designsystem into enhancement/inline-footer-958
alxzak
changed the title
|
Need to Tech refine further. This should be solved by using proper flexbox for modal. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR closes #958
PR Checklist
This draft PR contains an inline-footer
Integration tests of the inline-footer
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
Implementing an inline footer
Issue Number: #958
What is the new behavior?
Made an inline-footer available
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information