Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

scheduler: ElasticQuota runtime is no longer calculated when not needed #1855

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 19, 2024

Conversation

eahydra
Copy link
Member

@eahydra eahydra commented Jan 19, 2024

Ⅰ. Describe what this PR does

Changes have been made in PR #1839. When runtime is not needed, max will be used as the upper limit of ElasticQuota. But it hasn't been done thoroughly yet. Since there is no need to use runtime, there is no need to calculate runtime in the PreFilter stage. In addition, GetQuotaSummary is an externally exposed interface. It only needs to read the most recent runtime, and there is no need to recalculate runtime. If we need to compute runtime more aggressively in the future, we should consider implementing a more efficient, cohesive method to support it.

Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?

Ⅲ. Describe how to verify it

Ⅳ. Special notes for reviews

V. Checklist

  • I have written necessary docs and comments
  • I have added necessary unit tests and integration tests
  • All checks passed in make test

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 19, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: 4 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (ceecdf5) 67.07% compared to head (143c18b) 67.09%.

Files Patch % Lines
...r/plugins/elasticquota/core/group_quota_manager.go 50.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
.../scheduler/plugins/elasticquota/core/quota_info.go 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1855      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   67.07%   67.09%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         407      407              
  Lines       45705    45702       -3     
==========================================
+ Hits        30658    30663       +5     
+ Misses      12820    12812       -8     
  Partials     2227     2227              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 67.09% <55.55%> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Signed-off-by: Joseph <joseph.t.lee@outlook.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@buptcozy buptcozy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

wait

@koordinator-bot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: buptcozy

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@koordinator-bot koordinator-bot bot merged commit afbfea0 into koordinator-sh:main Jan 19, 2024
20 checks passed
saintube pushed a commit to saintube/koordinator that referenced this pull request Feb 22, 2024
saintube pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2024
…ed (#1855)

Signed-off-by: Joseph <joseph.t.lee@outlook.com>
saintube pushed a commit to saintube/koordinator that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2024
saintube pushed a commit to saintube/koordinator that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2024
saintube pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2024
…ed (#1855)

Signed-off-by: Joseph <joseph.t.lee@outlook.com>
ls-2018 pushed a commit to ls-2018/koordinator that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants