Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

scheduler: improve Coscheduling PreFilter status #1861

Conversation

eahydra
Copy link
Member

@eahydra eahydra commented Jan 20, 2024

Ⅰ. Describe what this PR does

If some Pods with the same PodGroup CRD object are created and scheduling fails, the coscheduling PreFilter returns framework.Error to stop preemption, but this is not the best option. It should return framework.UnschedulableAndUnresolvable.

framework.Error is special in the scheduler. It represents an internal service exception. We can determine whether the scheduler is healthy by identifying whether there are Errors, but a plugin that frequently returns Errors will prevent us from identifying exceptions.

Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?

fix #1860

Ⅲ. Describe how to verify it

Ⅳ. Special notes for reviews

V. Checklist

  • I have written necessary docs and comments
  • I have added necessary unit tests and integration tests
  • All checks passed in make test

Signed-off-by: Joseph <joseph.t.lee@outlook.com>
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 20, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (3d964cf) 67.26% compared to head (af6e70c) 67.28%.

Files Patch % Lines
pkg/scheduler/plugins/coscheduling/coscheduling.go 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1861      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   67.26%   67.28%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         407      407              
  Lines       45644    45644              
==========================================
+ Hits        30701    30711      +10     
+ Misses      12728    12722       -6     
+ Partials     2215     2211       -4     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 67.28% <0.00%> (+0.02%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@buptcozy buptcozy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@koordinator-bot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: buptcozy

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@koordinator-bot koordinator-bot bot merged commit da6a05c into koordinator-sh:main Jan 22, 2024
21 checks passed
saintube pushed a commit to saintube/koordinator that referenced this pull request Feb 22, 2024
Signed-off-by: Joseph <joseph.t.lee@outlook.com>
saintube pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2024
Signed-off-by: Joseph <joseph.t.lee@outlook.com>
saintube pushed a commit to saintube/koordinator that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2024
Signed-off-by: Joseph <joseph.t.lee@outlook.com>
saintube pushed a commit to saintube/koordinator that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2024
Signed-off-by: Joseph <joseph.t.lee@outlook.com>
saintube pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2024
Signed-off-by: Joseph <joseph.t.lee@outlook.com>
ls-2018 pushed a commit to ls-2018/koordinator that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2024
Signed-off-by: Joseph <joseph.t.lee@outlook.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[proposal] The Coscheduling PreFilter method should not return Error if failed
2 participants