Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

proposal: support Reservation preemption #1887

Merged

Conversation

xulinfei1996
Copy link
Contributor

@xulinfei1996 xulinfei1996 commented Feb 1, 2024

Ⅰ. Describe what this PR does

Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?

Design for #1856

Ⅲ. Describe how to verify it

Ⅳ. Special notes for reviews

V. Checklist

  • I have written necessary docs and comments
  • I have added necessary unit tests and integration tests
  • All checks passed in make test

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 1, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 67.55%. Comparing base (ad36a0b) to head (3531661).
Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1887      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   67.27%   67.55%   +0.28%     
==========================================
  Files         411      413       +2     
  Lines       45875    46229     +354     
==========================================
+ Hits        30863    31231     +368     
+ Misses      12775    12730      -45     
- Partials     2237     2268      +31     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 67.55% <ø> (+0.28%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@xulinfei1996 xulinfei1996 force-pushed the reservation-preempt branch 2 times, most recently from 3fefae6 to e4ce32f Compare February 1, 2024 06:30
@xulinfei1996 xulinfei1996 force-pushed the reservation-preempt branch 3 times, most recently from c68d885 to 1da6003 Compare February 4, 2024 01:55
Copy link
Member

@eahydra eahydra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@xulinfei1996 xulinfei1996 force-pushed the reservation-preempt branch 2 times, most recently from 766aa7b to e8da9bc Compare February 21, 2024 08:41
@hormes
Copy link
Member

hormes commented Feb 21, 2024

/lgtm

@eahydra
Copy link
Member

eahydra commented Feb 22, 2024

@buptcozy Do you have any further comments about the KEP?

Signed-off-by: xulinfei.xlf <xulinfei.xlf@alibaba-inc.com>
@hormes
Copy link
Member

hormes commented Feb 23, 2024

/lgtm
/approve

@koordinator-bot koordinator-bot bot added the lgtm label Feb 23, 2024
@koordinator-bot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: hormes

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@koordinator-bot koordinator-bot bot merged commit d646afd into koordinator-sh:main Feb 23, 2024
20 checks passed
ls-2018 pushed a commit to ls-2018/koordinator that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2024
Signed-off-by: xulinfei.xlf <xulinfei.xlf@alibaba-inc.com>
Co-authored-by: xulinfei.xlf <xulinfei.xlf@alibaba-inc.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants