Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Modifying Tags On Existing Volume #2082

Merged

Conversation

mdzraf
Copy link
Contributor

@mdzraf mdzraf commented Jul 8, 2024

Is this a bug fix or adding new feature?

New Feature

What is this PR about? / Why do we need it?

This feature allows for EBS CSI Driver customers to Add, Modify, and Delete tags of existing volumes via the official CSI ControllerModifyVolume RPC through a VolumeAttributesClass.

What testing is done?

Besides running existing unit and e2e tests, this feature was tested manually by doing the following:

  1. Make test cluster by running make cluster/create
  2. Creating and uploading image of driver with changes to ECR Repo
  3. Deploying driver to cluster via helm, with the necessary flags.
  4. Creating various testing VolumeAttributesClass documents
  5. Applying VACs and verifying that the correct tag operations were performed on the volume by describing the volume and looking at it's tags as well as ensuring that there is proper error handling

Notes:

This PR has a few extra VolumeAttributeClass documents that will be removed before merging, they are currently there because the unit tests and e2e tests for this feature are still being worked on (this is why there is some commented out code in the testing files) as well as to ensure that I can test any changes made after initial reviews.

Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Jul 8, 2024

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label Jul 8, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @mdzraf!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/aws-ebs-csi-driver 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/aws-ebs-csi-driver has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Jul 8, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @mdzraf. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 8, 2024
@ConnorJC3
Copy link
Contributor

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Jul 8, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 8, 2024

Code Coverage Diff

File Old Coverage New Coverage Delta
github.com/kubernetes-sigs/aws-ebs-csi-driver/pkg/cloud/cloud.go 85.4% 85.7% 0.3
github.com/kubernetes-sigs/aws-ebs-csi-driver/pkg/cloud/devicemanager/allocator.go 93.3% 100.0% 6.7
github.com/kubernetes-sigs/aws-ebs-csi-driver/pkg/driver/controller_modify_volume.go 77.2% 72.0% -5.2

Copy link
Contributor

@ConnorJC3 ConnorJC3 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rough initial review, did not review the tests yet and is not super thorough. Will do a more thorough and comprehensive review later.

hack/e2e/kops/patch-cluster.yaml Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/cloud/cloud.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/cloud/cloud.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/driver/controller_modify_volume.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/driver/controller_modify_volume.go Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/cloud/cloud.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/driver/controller_modify_volume.go Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@ConnorJC3 ConnorJC3 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Mostly lgtm, a few comments and a bunch of nitpicks

pkg/driver/controller_modify_volume.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/cloud/cloud.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/driver/controller_modify_volume.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/driver/controller_modify_volume.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/cloud/cloud_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/cloud/cloud_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/cloud/cloud_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/cloud/cloud_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/driver/controller_modify_volume_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/driver/controller_modify_volume.go Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/example-iam-policy.json Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/cloud/cloud.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/driver/controller_modify_volume.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/driver/controller_modify_volume.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/driver/controller_modify_volume.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/driver/controller_modify_volume.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@torredil
Copy link
Member

/retest

Copy link
Contributor

@AndrewSirenko AndrewSirenko left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great work on this! Left a few non-blocking comments. Thanks!

pkg/cloud/cloud.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/cloud/cloud.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/driver/controller_modify_volume.go Show resolved Hide resolved
tests/e2e/modify_volume.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tests/e2e/modify_volume.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@ConnorJC3 ConnorJC3 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm, other than

  1. Docs updates
  2. Cleanup extra files in examples/kubernetes/modify-volume/manifests/ and fix the main example
  3. Squash commits
  4. Rebase to fix govulncheck issue (I'll cut a PR to fix later today)

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 11, 2024
@torredil
Copy link
Member

/retest

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 12, 2024
@mdzraf mdzraf force-pushed the existingVolumeTagModification branch from 7a5b1f2 to 957d509 Compare July 12, 2024 13:25
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jul 12, 2024
@mdzraf mdzraf force-pushed the existingVolumeTagModification branch from 957d509 to 4e7abf9 Compare July 12, 2024 13:53
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jul 12, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 12, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@ConnorJC3 ConnorJC3 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review: 2 final comments, otherwise lgtm

docs/tagging.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/cloud/cloud_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 15, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@ConnorJC3 ConnorJC3 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes lgtm, needs squash

Copy link
Member

@torredil torredil left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/label tide/merge-method-squash
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges. label Jul 16, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 16, 2024
@mdzraf mdzraf force-pushed the existingVolumeTagModification branch from aded793 to 6572609 Compare July 16, 2024 14:34
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 16, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@ConnorJC3 ConnorJC3 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 16, 2024
@AndrewSirenko
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: AndrewSirenko

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 16, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 2c4937a into kubernetes-sigs:master Jul 16, 2024
19 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants