-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
🌱 Release v1.6.3 #10252
Merged
Merged
🌱 Release v1.6.3 #10252
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ | ||
## 👌 Kubernetes version support | ||
|
||
- Management Cluster: v1.25.x -> v1.29.x | ||
- Workload Cluster: v1.23.x -> v1.29.x | ||
|
||
[More information about version support can be found here](https://cluster-api.sigs.k8s.io/reference/versions.html) | ||
|
||
## Changes since v1.6.2 | ||
## :chart_with_upwards_trend: Overview | ||
- 14 new commits merged | ||
- 2 bugs fixed 🐛 | ||
|
||
## :bug: Bug Fixes | ||
- CAPD: Fix(capd): remove hack for btrfs/zfs support (#10192) | ||
- e2e: Test: retry GetOwnerGraph in owner references test on certificate errors (#10217) | ||
|
||
## :seedling: Others | ||
- CABPK: Add pod metadata to capbk manager (#10212) | ||
- clusterctl: Add 0 default to worker-machine-count help (#10205) | ||
- clusterctl: Add hivelocity infra provider to clusterctl (#10168) | ||
- Dependency: Bump go version to 1.21.8 (#10246) | ||
- Dependency: Bump protobuf to v1.33.0 to address CVEs (#10249) | ||
- Release: Improve release-staging build (#10190) | ||
- Release: Read in dockerfiles from stdin (#10209) | ||
|
||
:book: Additionally, there have been 4 contributions to our documentation and book. (#10230, #10241, #10243, #10260) | ||
|
||
## Dependencies | ||
|
||
### Added | ||
_Nothing has changed._ | ||
|
||
### Changed | ||
- google.golang.org/protobuf: v1.31.0 → v1.33.0 | ||
|
||
### Removed | ||
_Nothing has changed._ | ||
|
||
_Thanks to all our contributors!_ 😊 |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we drop this or add a "No dependency changes in this release" statement?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hm. Q: Why is this section empty? We have a bump in l.22
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this was updated with the force push just a few minutes ago: https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api/pull/10252/files#r1521783375
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
does that look right you @sbueringer ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
All good. Sorry I think I missed the sub sections :)