Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🌱 Partially revert changes for ":bug: Cluster should be provisoned when cpRef and endpoint is set" #10903

Conversation

fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member

What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR is a small improvement on changes introduced by #10873, making sure that cluster provisioned phase isn't including control plane fully ready (which was altering the original semantic of those phases)

Also improved the go comments for the phase const to better reflect current state

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #10885

/area api

cc @vincepri

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/api Issues or PRs related to the APIs cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jul 18, 2024
@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/assign @vincepri

Thx for fixing this!

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 18, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 304807d417099b293048613134d4722d6f14a896

@sbueringer sbueringer added this to the v1.8 milestone Jul 18, 2024
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

I'll take the "review approval" as approval :)

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sbueringer

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 18, 2024
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

/cherry-pick release-1.7

@k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot

@sbueringer: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-1.7 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-1.7

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit ad97dc5 into kubernetes-sigs:main Jul 18, 2024
23 checks passed
@k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot

@sbueringer: new pull request created: #10904

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-1.7

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/api Issues or PRs related to the APIs cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Test: When testing KCP remediation Should replace unhealthy machines is failing
5 participants