Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🏃[e2e] add ClusterProvider and ClusterProxy #2911

Conversation

fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member

What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR introduces it is required to have a cleaner separation between:

  • A ClusterProvider, with its implementation based on kind
  • A ClusterProxy that can act as an intermediary with an existing Kubernetes cluster, no matter if the cluster was created by the aforementioned ClusterProvider, by Cluster API (a workload cluster or a self-hosted cluster) or else.

This change is required in order to implement tests on self-hosted clusters (more details in the issue)

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #2910

xref #2753
xref #2637
xref #2636

/assign @vincepri
/assign @sedefsavas

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Apr 15, 2020
@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini force-pushed the e2e-add-clusterprovider-and-clusterproxy branch from 97a2317 to 6f8b272 Compare April 15, 2020 13:03
@vincepri
Copy link
Member

/milestone v0.3.4

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v0.3.4 milestone Apr 15, 2020
@vincepri
Copy link
Member

/approve
/assign @sedefsavas

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: fabriziopandini, vincepri

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 15, 2020
@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini force-pushed the e2e-add-clusterprovider-and-clusterproxy branch from 6f8b272 to fc81772 Compare April 15, 2020 20:18
test/framework/cluster_proxy.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/framework/cluster_proxy.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/framework/cluster_proxy.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/framework/cluster_proxy.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini force-pushed the e2e-add-clusterprovider-and-clusterproxy branch from fc81772 to 20e2800 Compare April 15, 2020 20:47
@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member Author

@sedefsavas thanks for the feedback!
Comment addressed

@sedefsavas
Copy link

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 15, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit f38fd7d into kubernetes-sigs:master Apr 15, 2020
@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini deleted the e2e-add-clusterprovider-and-clusterproxy branch April 16, 2020 10:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[E2E] split BootstrapCluster and ManagementCluster
5 participants